<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool Gear: The Hoodman Loupe Rocks!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:46:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tabaluga</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-248978</link>
		<dc:creator>tabaluga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 17:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-248978</guid>
		<description>Hey Guys,

Could you please write down the main dimensions of Hoodman Loupe 3.0. I got a Canon 550d camera which has 3&quot; (but 3/2) screen, so I,m not sure it will fit. 

Thanks a lot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Guys,</p>
<p>Could you please write down the main dimensions of Hoodman Loupe 3.0. I got a Canon 550d camera which has 3&#8243; (but 3/2) screen, so I,m not sure it will fit. </p>
<p>Thanks a lot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerson</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-223313</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-223313</guid>
		<description>This is often a very smart browse on behalf of me, Should admit that you are one in every of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is often a very smart browse on behalf of me, Should admit that you are one in every of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-165855</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-165855</guid>
		<description>While I purchased and use the Hoodman Loupe 3.0, for the money it should have included a way to quickly mount and remove it from the LCD.   For quick checking of an image it works great, but to use as a viewfinder while in video mode (5D MK II) the rubber band option, which Hoodman charges a ridiculous $20 for, still allows the Loupe to slide around too much.   Another issue when using it as a viewfinder is that it consistently fogs up if I keep my eye against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I purchased and use the Hoodman Loupe 3.0, for the money it should have included a way to quickly mount and remove it from the LCD.   For quick checking of an image it works great, but to use as a viewfinder while in video mode (5D MK II) the rubber band option, which Hoodman charges a ridiculous $20 for, still allows the Loupe to slide around too much.   Another issue when using it as a viewfinder is that it consistently fogs up if I keep my eye against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-125255</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-125255</guid>
		<description>Just purchased the NEW Hoodman Loupe 3 inch, which seems to have had a few other design tweaks other than just the overall screen coverage.

I&#039;m here in the UK and I don&#039;t have endless amounts of money so £73 including delivery is a serious outlay for me. I&#039;m using a Canon G10 (my first proper digital camera) and the first thing that I notice over the weekend when I took it out on a clear winters day was that the screen, even thought beautifully bright and clear indoors was washed out (I think it&#039;s also a lot of ambient light passing into your eyes makes things difficult, it&#039;s not just the screens fault). Anyway, I love using the 3inch screen on the G10 with it&#039;s true colour and pin sharp image, so for me this is a big part of what digital photography is all about.
Well, after looking through Scott Kelby&#039;s books I remembered the Hoodman Loupe and thought I&#039;d do a full research job on the internet when I got back home, being able to use my screen every time I take a photo is very important to me, I like to see what I&#039;m getting. Well, the NEW version of the Hoodman Loupe 3 inch was the one I ended up purchasing, to be honest paying £73 for it knocked me sick at first, that was until I actually received it.
Even though I am still to use this device in the proper wilds, after testing it in situations that usually have me squinting I can say that this is £73 pounds very well spent, it&#039;s opened up digital the way I like it, on a nice screen. This NEW 3inch version is quality (maybe not £73 worth but close), nice carbon looking case, nice new type of soft neck cord (more like a ribbon really) that allows you to press a pinch-clip to release the Loupe while keeping the neck cord on, and the Loupe itself is solid build, but soft to the touch, with a nice glass lens and turning eyepiece.

In short if you like digital photography this really does need to go with you everywhere and because it&#039;s contact area with the camera is non-slip you can easily use it while taking photographs not just reviewing photographs.

Brill product, don&#039;t think to much about the price if you can help it, save up and make your life much, much easier, possible worth it&#039;s weight on gold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just purchased the NEW Hoodman Loupe 3 inch, which seems to have had a few other design tweaks other than just the overall screen coverage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m here in the UK and I don&#8217;t have endless amounts of money so £73 including delivery is a serious outlay for me. I&#8217;m using a Canon G10 (my first proper digital camera) and the first thing that I notice over the weekend when I took it out on a clear winters day was that the screen, even thought beautifully bright and clear indoors was washed out (I think it&#8217;s also a lot of ambient light passing into your eyes makes things difficult, it&#8217;s not just the screens fault). Anyway, I love using the 3inch screen on the G10 with it&#8217;s true colour and pin sharp image, so for me this is a big part of what digital photography is all about.<br />
Well, after looking through Scott Kelby&#8217;s books I remembered the Hoodman Loupe and thought I&#8217;d do a full research job on the internet when I got back home, being able to use my screen every time I take a photo is very important to me, I like to see what I&#8217;m getting. Well, the NEW version of the Hoodman Loupe 3 inch was the one I ended up purchasing, to be honest paying £73 for it knocked me sick at first, that was until I actually received it.<br />
Even though I am still to use this device in the proper wilds, after testing it in situations that usually have me squinting I can say that this is £73 pounds very well spent, it&#8217;s opened up digital the way I like it, on a nice screen. This NEW 3inch version is quality (maybe not £73 worth but close), nice carbon looking case, nice new type of soft neck cord (more like a ribbon really) that allows you to press a pinch-clip to release the Loupe while keeping the neck cord on, and the Loupe itself is solid build, but soft to the touch, with a nice glass lens and turning eyepiece.</p>
<p>In short if you like digital photography this really does need to go with you everywhere and because it&#8217;s contact area with the camera is non-slip you can easily use it while taking photographs not just reviewing photographs.</p>
<p>Brill product, don&#8217;t think to much about the price if you can help it, save up and make your life much, much easier, possible worth it&#8217;s weight on gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-102032</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-102032</guid>
		<description>The wedding Photographer at my best friend&#039;s wedding had one of these and I knew I had to get one for myself. I forgot to ask him what it was called, figuring I&#039;d be able to find it on google/amazon, etc.

Well, after much searching, I finally found it, but nobody has one in staock, not even the manufacturer. It seems that this gret device has been discontinued. What a bummer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wedding Photographer at my best friend&#8217;s wedding had one of these and I knew I had to get one for myself. I forgot to ask him what it was called, figuring I&#8217;d be able to find it on google/amazon, etc.</p>
<p>Well, after much searching, I finally found it, but nobody has one in staock, not even the manufacturer. It seems that this gret device has been discontinued. What a bummer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-56003</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 08:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-56003</guid>
		<description>Re: Magnification: If the Hoodman loupe actually magnified much, you&#039;d get pixillation. My 30D&#039;s display has only 230K pixels. As the images are 8 MP, one pixel on the LCD corresponds to more than 32 on the image. (It&#039;s more because the image doesn&#039;t use all of the LCD.) Magnify that and you just get a larger fuzzy image. 

In a sense, the Hoodman loupe does &quot;magnify&quot; the image, as it gets your eye a lot closer to the image. Halving the distance is the same as magnifying by two. Most photographers I&#039;ve watched view the screen from 18&quot; or so. Using the loupe puts you about 3-4&quot; away, &quot;magnifying&quot; by 4-6 times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Magnification: If the Hoodman loupe actually magnified much, you&#8217;d get pixillation. My 30D&#8217;s display has only 230K pixels. As the images are 8 MP, one pixel on the LCD corresponds to more than 32 on the image. (It&#8217;s more because the image doesn&#8217;t use all of the LCD.) Magnify that and you just get a larger fuzzy image. </p>
<p>In a sense, the Hoodman loupe does &#8220;magnify&#8221; the image, as it gets your eye a lot closer to the image. Halving the distance is the same as magnifying by two. Most photographers I&#8217;ve watched view the screen from 18&#8243; or so. Using the loupe puts you about 3-4&#8243; away, &#8220;magnifying&#8221; by 4-6 times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laberCast &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; laberCast_ Folge #1: Alles neu im Juni!</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>laberCast &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; laberCast_ Folge #1: Alles neu im Juni!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-906</guid>
		<description>[...] Hoodman Loupe f&#252;r DSLR / Digital Cameras: http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hoodman Loupe f&#252;r DSLR / Digital Cameras: <a href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283" rel="nofollow">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Twisting it is a +/-3 Diopter adjustment I believe (for your vision).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twisting it is a +/-3 Diopter adjustment I believe (for your vision).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Marsh</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Marsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-902</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I didn&#039;t play with it enough to find the magnifier part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I didn&#8217;t play with it enough to find the magnifier part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Flanakin</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Flanakin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-901</guid>
		<description>Just as a note back to Al, Janine Smith above indicates that the Loupe does magnify.  Who is right?  I may get one if the Loupe magnifies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as a note back to Al, Janine Smith above indicates that the Loupe does magnify.  Who is right?  I may get one if the Loupe magnifies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Marsh</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Marsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-894</guid>
		<description>I see no disparaging comments, so I will add mine. Any loupe I ever owned magnifies. This one doesn&#039;t. I have a 20D with a little tiny screen, and the Hoodman gives me a darker little tiny screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see no disparaging comments, so I will add mine. Any loupe I ever owned magnifies. This one doesn&#8217;t. I have a 20D with a little tiny screen, and the Hoodman gives me a darker little tiny screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283/comment-page-1#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/283#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Hi Pat:
Although my LCD is far from &quot;dead on&quot; for color, it&#039;s not off so far off that I can&#039;t at least make reasonable decisions based on what I see (remember; most people don&#039;t calibrate their monitors, so it&#039;s at least as close as that).

Besides, I&#039;m not using it primarily to look at color; I&#039;m looking at my LCD for tone, contrast, exposure, composition (highlight warnings), and just making sure I &#039;got the shot&quot; and for that I love my LCD, and the Hoodman Loupe lets me use this tool I love more often. 

Also, as for Vinnie&#039;s post above; I&#039;ve seen all the stuff Vinny carries, and if he has made room for it, believe me---it&#039;s worth carrying. Give it a try; I think you&#039;ll be surprised at how much you like it. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pat:<br />
Although my LCD is far from &#8220;dead on&#8221; for color, it&#8217;s not off so far off that I can&#8217;t at least make reasonable decisions based on what I see (remember; most people don&#8217;t calibrate their monitors, so it&#8217;s at least as close as that).</p>
<p>Besides, I&#8217;m not using it primarily to look at color; I&#8217;m looking at my LCD for tone, contrast, exposure, composition (highlight warnings), and just making sure I &#8216;got the shot&#8221; and for that I love my LCD, and the Hoodman Loupe lets me use this tool I love more often. </p>
<p>Also, as for Vinnie&#8217;s post above; I&#8217;ve seen all the stuff Vinny carries, and if he has made room for it, believe me&#8212;it&#8217;s worth carrying. Give it a try; I think you&#8217;ll be surprised at how much you like it. <img src='http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
