<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Releases Lightroom 1.1 (and more Lightroom News)</title>
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for personal friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Watteau</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-2130</link>
		<author>Robert Watteau</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>Two things I wish from Adobe.

1. repair the speed loss of 1.1 has compared to 1.0 (longer load times of images, longer switching times between modules.

2. What I really hope is, that Adobe will break down the impractical wall between library and develop module. It doesn't make any sense, and makes you switch constantly between the two modules.

As you mentioned in your book, Scott, the before - after comparison is a poor tool to work on versions of images. I also work with virtual copies, but to see those side by side you have to go into survey mode, and for changes back into the develop module

Maybe you found some way around this. I just started your book (which I enjoy as very practical) - after having read Martin Evening's book, which was a rather unsatisfactory laundry list of features, missing out on practical information.

But I still want the wall between develop module and library come down, and give me the possibility of adding and removing panels. Apple's Aperture has a clear advantage in this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things I wish from Adobe.</p>
<p>1. repair the speed loss of 1.1 has compared to 1.0 (longer load times of images, longer switching times between modules.</p>
<p>2. What I really hope is, that Adobe will break down the impractical wall between library and develop module. It doesn&#8217;t make any sense, and makes you switch constantly between the two modules.</p>
<p>As you mentioned in your book, Scott, the before - after comparison is a poor tool to work on versions of images. I also work with virtual copies, but to see those side by side you have to go into survey mode, and for changes back into the develop module</p>
<p>Maybe you found some way around this. I just started your book (which I enjoy as very practical) - after having read Martin Evening&#8217;s book, which was a rather unsatisfactory laundry list of features, missing out on practical information.</p>
<p>But I still want the wall between develop module and library come down, and give me the possibility of adding and removing panels. Apple&#8217;s Aperture has a clear advantage in this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attie Heunis says...</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1193</link>
		<author>Attie Heunis says...</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 1.1 is out!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Today when starting Lightroom 1 was told that Lightroom 1.1 was available for download (at the Lightroom website). Being the technofile that I am I downloaded and installed instantly. Install is painless. By reading the release notes I was wondering if...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 1.1 is out!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Today when starting Lightroom 1 was told that Lightroom 1.1 was available for download (at the Lightroom website). Being the technofile that I am I downloaded and installed instantly. Install is painless. By reading the release notes I was wondering if&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1152</link>
		<author>Casey</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott, love the books I have a lot of them. Where are you going to put this update? Is it going to be on the page addressed in your books? The same place to get the sample images?

Thanks for the books, can't wait to pick up the CS3 book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott, love the books I have a lot of them. Where are you going to put this update? Is it going to be on the page addressed in your books? The same place to get the sample images?</p>
<p>Thanks for the books, can&#8217;t wait to pick up the CS3 book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1150</link>
		<author>Michael Shaw</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1150</guid>
		<description>To Leon:

My Lightroom 1.0 white balance presets are missing, too. So were my WOW and Inside-Lightroom presets, but I was able to re-import those sets of presets. I'm hoping Scott's 1.1 .pdf addresses the 1.0 white balance issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Leon:</p>
<p>My Lightroom 1.0 white balance presets are missing, too. So were my WOW and Inside-Lightroom presets, but I was able to re-import those sets of presets. I&#8217;m hoping Scott&#8217;s 1.1 .pdf addresses the 1.0 white balance issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glyn Dewis</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1116</link>
		<author>Glyn Dewis</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

Thought I'd copy over this entry I've just put into the NAPP forums:

"Hi Guys,

Last Saturday I was photographing the 2nd Annual Heathrow Airport Summer Ball - a fabulous event, in aid of the Dream Flight Charity who raise money to send terminally ill children around the world to visit places like Disney Land etc...

There were roughly 300 people in attendance, all dressed in the Sunday best and it was my job to do portrait photographs of them all as they came in. I set up two (2) elinchrom flash heads with softboxes, a collapsible black lastolite background with a Nikon SB800 set to add a kick of light onto it.

For the first time I decided to shoot tethered as Scott Kelby describes in his Lightroom for Digital Photographers book, for a number of reasons. The main ones being speed, so I didn't have to download images throughout the night from a memory card, and secondly, I and the 'model' could see the photos on the big screen and say which one they wanted.

Lightroom worked faultlessly!!! and with the aid of an expo disc I had absolutely no need to do any colour correction. All I had to do was simply apply a little sharpening along with a slight vignette (all in Lightroom) and then crop the images using synchronise to 8" x 6" for the Dye Sub Printer to churn out. I couldn't have wished for it to work any better!!!

All in all, the response from attendees was excellent. They loved seeing the images on screen so I was guaranteed a sale, the expo disc was a massive time saver, and Lightroom was a gift from the gods. From portraits alone, in a short space of time I made £840 or put another way $1677, with a percentage going to the charity.

I've got more events coming this year alongside my other work, and I think the only thing I'll change is to shoot wirelessly to the laptop using the Nikon Wireless Transmitter."

Thankyou Adobe and thankyou Scott!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>Thought I&#8217;d copy over this entry I&#8217;ve just put into the NAPP forums:</p>
<p>&#8220;Hi Guys,</p>
<p>Last Saturday I was photographing the 2nd Annual Heathrow Airport Summer Ball - a fabulous event, in aid of the Dream Flight Charity who raise money to send terminally ill children around the world to visit places like Disney Land etc&#8230;</p>
<p>There were roughly 300 people in attendance, all dressed in the Sunday best and it was my job to do portrait photographs of them all as they came in. I set up two (2) elinchrom flash heads with softboxes, a collapsible black lastolite background with a Nikon SB800 set to add a kick of light onto it.</p>
<p>For the first time I decided to shoot tethered as Scott Kelby describes in his Lightroom for Digital Photographers book, for a number of reasons. The main ones being speed, so I didn&#8217;t have to download images throughout the night from a memory card, and secondly, I and the &#8216;model&#8217; could see the photos on the big screen and say which one they wanted.</p>
<p>Lightroom worked faultlessly!!! and with the aid of an expo disc I had absolutely no need to do any colour correction. All I had to do was simply apply a little sharpening along with a slight vignette (all in Lightroom) and then crop the images using synchronise to 8&#8243; x 6&#8243; for the Dye Sub Printer to churn out. I couldn&#8217;t have wished for it to work any better!!!</p>
<p>All in all, the response from attendees was excellent. They loved seeing the images on screen so I was guaranteed a sale, the expo disc was a massive time saver, and Lightroom was a gift from the gods. From portraits alone, in a short space of time I made £840 or put another way $1677, with a percentage going to the charity.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got more events coming this year alongside my other work, and I think the only thing I&#8217;ll change is to shoot wirelessly to the laptop using the Nikon Wireless Transmitter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thankyou Adobe and thankyou Scott!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Chinn</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1115</link>
		<author>Bill Chinn</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts to how this upgrade will effect the manner in which you teach the Lightroom Seminar? As someone who attended the LA session I would like to know how the future seminars will change. eg. With better sharpening available in 1.1 is there a consistent reason for going to CS3 anymore or would lab sharpening still be preferred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts to how this upgrade will effect the manner in which you teach the Lightroom Seminar? As someone who attended the LA session I would like to know how the future seminars will change. eg. With better sharpening available in 1.1 is there a consistent reason for going to CS3 anymore or would lab sharpening still be preferred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Robson</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1113</link>
		<author>Jonathan Robson</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott, slightly off subject, but do you have any insider knowledge on when Adobe will release a plugin API for Lightroom, this is one area that it is really lacking in currently. Thanks for any info. and thanks for the pdf update, not many authors would make such a great effort.

Cheers
Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott, slightly off subject, but do you have any insider knowledge on when Adobe will release a plugin API for Lightroom, this is one area that it is really lacking in currently. Thanks for any info. and thanks for the pdf update, not many authors would make such a great effort.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Medina</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1109</link>
		<author>David Medina</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>Scott, I have nothing but the outmost respect for you all of the guys and gals at NAPP. Have all your book. But I must disagree with the firts paragraph of your statement. V 1.1 is NOT a major upgrade. Is toes add some promising functionality (clarity), does a better job on noise reduction (I stll prefer Noise Ninja) and work faster when you have a large library (catalog). But overall it does not deal with what most of us are asking for. Make me wonder if Adobe is really listening. 

What about the dual display Support, ability to transport "shoots" from laptop to desktop (as in beta 4) and a more robust libary??

I dislike the fragmented aproach of Adobre in LR library. I hate that only the master is moved to a collection leaving behind nay other version stacked with the master. To organize and select images in LR Library module is useless. LR continues to be just a version of Bridge in steroid rather than a robust cataloging solution. 

It is dissapointing solution from a company like Adobe. It made me look into Apple Aperture and although is not perfect, I am making the change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I have nothing but the outmost respect for you all of the guys and gals at NAPP. Have all your book. But I must disagree with the firts paragraph of your statement. V 1.1 is NOT a major upgrade. Is toes add some promising functionality (clarity), does a better job on noise reduction (I stll prefer Noise Ninja) and work faster when you have a large library (catalog). But overall it does not deal with what most of us are asking for. Make me wonder if Adobe is really listening. </p>
<p>What about the dual display Support, ability to transport &#8220;shoots&#8221; from laptop to desktop (as in beta 4) and a more robust libary??</p>
<p>I dislike the fragmented aproach of Adobre in LR library. I hate that only the master is moved to a collection leaving behind nay other version stacked with the master. To organize and select images in LR Library module is useless. LR continues to be just a version of Bridge in steroid rather than a robust cataloging solution. </p>
<p>It is dissapointing solution from a company like Adobe. It made me look into Apple Aperture and although is not perfect, I am making the change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene McCullagh</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1101</link>
		<author>Gene McCullagh</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>Excellent news!  Thanks for the update to your book!  I look forward to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent news!  Thanks for the update to your book!  I look forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pix Veritas</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1097</link>
		<author>Pix Veritas</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Adobe Rolls Out Lightroom 1.1 !!!!!&lt;/strong&gt;


THE WAIT IS OVER!  Yes indeed!  Adobe has rolled out the FREE upgrade to Photoshop Lightroom 1.1 


Aside from some bug fixes there is an abundance of new functionality just waiting to be explored!  Windows users can click here  to download the upgrade. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Adobe Rolls Out Lightroom 1.1 !!!!!</strong></p>
<p>THE WAIT IS OVER!  Yes indeed!  Adobe has rolled out the FREE upgrade to Photoshop Lightroom 1.1 </p>
<p>Aside from some bug fixes there is an abundance of new functionality just waiting to be explored!  Windows users can click here  to download the upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1088</link>
		<author>Leon</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>Would you please address in the pdf update what happened to the white balance presets in the library module (daylight, shade, etc.)? They only seem to be available for raw files in 1.1 but they were available for all file types in 1.0. 

Thanks in advance,

Leon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you please address in the pdf update what happened to the white balance presets in the library module (daylight, shade, etc.)? They only seem to be available for raw files in 1.1 but they were available for all file types in 1.0. </p>
<p>Thanks in advance,</p>
<p>Leon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1083</link>
		<author>Jeff</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/293#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>Good deal releasing the update for free.  I just bought the book a few weeks ago and am still working through it.  Hate to replace a book I haven't finished reading yet.  Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good deal releasing the update for free.  I just bought the book a few weeks ago and am still working through it.  Hate to replace a book I haven&#8217;t finished reading yet.  Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
