Toggle

Field Report: Gitzo Traveler Tripod, and Really Right Stuff’s BH-40 Ballhead

By Scott on Friday, August 24th, 2007 at 1:32 am | updates.

bh40.jpg

Here’s another field report from my trip out West: I’ll start with the Gitzo Traveler tripod. This is a kind of a weird review for me, because I’ve really become attached to this tripod to the extent that I wouldn’t want to be without it. But on the other hand, it’s got one thing that really bugs me, and it’s so expensive that I’m not sure I can justify its cost. So, here’s my report:

The Traveler is just amazingly light (even lighter than I had imagined). It’s fun to hand it to other photographers and watch them laugh and shake their heads at its light weight (even with a BH-40 ballhead attached). When collapsed, it’s as small as it is light, and I can’t imagine what Gitzo could do to make it smaller or lighter. It easily supports a heavy Nikon D2X and large 70-200mm VR Nikon lens (together that’s quite a load), although on this trip it made easy work of the Canon 5D and 70mm-200 f/4 I was shooting. It didn’t even break a sweat.

So, here’s my problem: Gitzo’s G-lock one-twist leg lock technology is just amazing making set up and tear down about a 20 second deal (I have a Gitzo Mountaineer tripod as my main tripod, which has the same G-lock one-twist leg lock system and it just rocks), but with the Traveler; one or more of the bottom legs always seems to slip on me. It’s like I didn’t tighten them enough–but I did.

I keep thinking it’s got to be my fault—maybe I’m rushing to set it up too quickly, so I started double-checking to make sure I’ve tighted all the legs, but just about every time I’m shooting, one or two of the tiny legs at the bottom always seems to start slowly collapsing as though I hadn’t tightened them fully.

This has never happened with my Mountaineer—only the Traveler. Now, it is entirely possible that there’s a defect in either my particular unit, or in the way I tighten these smaller sized G-locks, so I’m willing to give it the benefit of the doubt there, but then there’s the price issue. I had to have my wife buy it for me as a gift, because it sells for around $600 for just the legs, and I personally would have a hard time buying that for myself (I’m just that way—but if someone else buys it for me, then I don’t feel so bad. I know, it’s still my money, but it’s how I fool myself into not feeling bad about spending $600 on camera accessories).

So, while overall I really like it (it’s actually probably the best ultra light-weight tripod out there), and it will probably see more use from me than my much larger Gitzo Mountaineer, I’d love to see those G-lock legs work better, and I’d be more comfortable with it in the $349 to $399 price range.

Now, onto to the  BH-40 Midsized ballhead from Really Right Stuff. I’ve been a huge fan of the BH-55 ballhead (the one that generally lives on my Gitzo Mountaineer tripod), I think, if it’s possible, I like the BH-40 even more. The size is just perfect. In fact, after using it for the week, my BH-55 actually feels a little big (though if I was shooting 400mm or longer glass, you would need the BH-55 for sure).

My shooting buddy Jeff Revell had just bought a BH-40, and this was his first shoot with it as well and we were just having a BH-40 love fest from our first shoot on. We both couldn’t say enough about it. It’s so well designed and so “right-sized.” It’s not too heavy, yet very sturdy, and it’s just a joy to use with incredibly smooth movement, it locks into place effortlessly, and it even supported a heavyweight Sigma 300mm zoom without flinching, even though I doubt it’s rated to carry glass that heavy.

I can’t recommend the BH-40 enough—it is, truly, the ballhead of the gods (if there is such a thing), and one that I would buy again without hesitation even though “it ain’t cheap” at around $399. (here’s the link to RRS’s site).

Just a reminder: these field tests are just that—there’s no fancy lab testing, where I disassemble the units into individual pieces or weigh the individual carbon fibers —it’s just my personal experience using the equipment in the field–good or bad, just like it happened. I hope it helps you find some great equipment, because great stuff is a blast!

Comments received from other Sites

Listed using this TrackBack URL

19 Visitor Comments

Subscribe to comments with RSS

  1. #1

    Hi Scott,

    I fully agree! I found myself bying the Gitzo / BH-40 combination 1 month ago, after reading another older article of you about these (I hate you!)
    I must say, the combination rocks!

    Now, I am a newbie and like all newbies, I habe a stupid question: How do you manage that the ballhead is screwed frimly on the tripod?
    I tried loctyte, but I am not sure to be right there.

    Thanks!

    Régis

    Régis on August 24th, 2007 at 3:07 am
  2. #2

    Scott, I noticed that the BH-40 you linked (the $399 job) does not come with a clamp. What clamp did you choose to use with it?

    Matt

    Matt Brandon on August 24th, 2007 at 8:03 am
  3. #3

    Hi Matt:
    I use the clamp you see in the photo, which works really well.

    -Scott

    Scott on August 24th, 2007 at 8:17 am
  4. #4

    Scott - I suspect you got a bum tripod - I’ve got two Gitzos with the G-locks and have never had this problem. Your assessment of these tripods is absolutely spot-on, I’m sorry your experience has been marred by the flimsy leg locks on your unit. Bummer. Have you talked to anyone about it? You have connections at B&H, surely they have some kind of tripod specialist who could look at this, maybe exchange it on warranty? I’m sure you’ve thought of it, but as you pointed out, these babies are $600 each - no reason to suck it up if you don’t have to. Cheers!

    David duChemin on August 24th, 2007 at 10:17 am
  5. #5

    Scott - I have the same traveler tripod from Gitzo and haven’t expierenced any problems, but onced struggled with the BH-55 and the people at Really Right Stuff were fabulous to work with, and most willig to correct fix or what ever. In my case it was not the product but using the ball head erroneously, my fault. Thanks for all you do for the industry. You make it fun and informative for all of us[ whether Canon of Nikon] They are all great. How lucky we are to have such good equipment available.

    Bill Maddux on August 24th, 2007 at 11:20 am
  6. #6

    Perhaps next Scott can update us on his choices for printers & other gear we gotta have to make our digital photos better.

    keith on August 24th, 2007 at 11:32 am
  7. #7

    Scott,

    I totally agree with the combination. I bought both for my recent quick trip to Europe and used it for all the photos on my gallery that you guys had in the editors choice last week. (thanks for that by the way!) Dragged it all over the place quite effortlessly. I bought the BH55 after I returned for another tripod and I agree, the BH40 rocks!

    Thanks for your dedication, humor, and endless energy. I enjoy your daily blogs. Hope to meet you in Vegas!

    PS. Any good tips of photo locations and times for capturing Valley of Fire or Red Rocks out there?

    Michael Steighner on August 24th, 2007 at 12:32 pm
  8. #8

    Scott -

    Just tried emailing you (by guessing addresses) a link to a video from a researcher working on digital manipulation of images as it pertains to ‘content aware image resizing.’ I think it holds interesting ramifications for photojournalism, most of all — http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/08/21/smart-image-resizing-cuts-the-useless-out-of-your-pics/

    Email or respond if you take a look - wonder how you’d weigh in on the ramifications/ethics questions something like this might raise.

    -Mike
    Corning, NY

    Mike Simons on August 24th, 2007 at 7:38 pm
  9. #9

    Hello Scott:

    As in an earlier comment, I also got the BH-40, based primarily on your discussion when you started using it. Truly a very fine piece of equipment. Also got their L-plate for the D80. Very nice setup now.

    As to a tripod, I thought about the Gitzo Traveler, but with the cost of the BH-40 and L-plate, that was a bit much for my budget. So I opted for a Slik Pro 700 DX which I saw good reviews on, and a very good tripod for the cost. It’s not a Traveler, but it’s also not $600. Got just the legs from B&H at a good price.

    Thanks for your honest sharing of practical information that is truly useful to us who are still way back on the learning curve - from digital photography, to Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom. Keep up the good work.

    Larry on August 25th, 2007 at 12:16 am
  10. #10

    Hi Scott,

    I am having a lot of issues with my back, neck from doing a lot of Photoshop work. I use a tablet and I have visited many site on ergonomics. I was wondering how you use your tablet with your keyboard(the arrangement) what kind of desk you have, chair, etc. I believe a lot of people suffer from these problems and I wondered your thoughts and suggestions on all this stuff. I would GREATLY appreciate it!
    Sincerely yours,
    Rob Benevides

    Rob Benevides on August 26th, 2007 at 12:28 pm
  11. #11

    I’m a little late to the posting, but my understanding based on the Gitzo website is that the Traveler range of tripods do not have G-Lock. Just thought I’d point that out.

    Top L on September 19th, 2007 at 8:27 pm
  12. #12

    Scott,

    I’ve just received the BH-40 after reviewing your article. Looks like a great unit! Unfortunately, I have the same problem as Regis. How do you get the existing Gitzo ballhead off the traveler?

    Bill on October 24th, 2007 at 4:29 pm
  13. #13

    Actually, I think there’s one Traveler model with g-locks (the Gitzo GT90TT).

    http://titanium.gitzo.com/

    walter on October 28th, 2007 at 8:51 pm
  14. #14

    Scott or anyone else… do you think the BH-40 is good for macro work? This is for 40D/5D shooting with the Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro.

    Largest lens is 70-200mm f/2,8L and possibly the 300mm f/4L IS in the future.

    Brian on May 10th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
  15. #15

    cool site 10x

    Xcashbbs on July 5th, 2008 at 10:32 pm
  16. #16

    very best job

    Hypakpki on July 6th, 2008 at 2:14 am
  17. #17

    Preved webmastero4ki,

    Jfhhbtpf on August 4th, 2008 at 1:46 pm
  18. #18

    comment2, teeny porn loli bbs, qia,

    pitot tube on August 28th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
  19. #19

    Hi Scott I have read your books and know you are a fan of RRS BH55 . I am in the market for either the 55 or 40.I will be primarily using it for landscapes and macro. I presently have an Induro CX214 Just would like alittle input.
    Thanks
    Keith

    Keith on September 2nd, 2008 at 11:13 pm

Drop me a note

You can use the small form below to leave a comment on this page.