<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report From New York (and Lightroom vs. The Bridge)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:59:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: News, news, news.. &#187; Scott Kelby Teaches to over 1,300 Photoshop Users in NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-17948</link>
		<dc:creator>News, news, news.. &#187; Scott Kelby Teaches to over 1,300 Photoshop Users in NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-17948</guid>
		<description>[...] Read Scott&#8217;s post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read Scott&#8217;s post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-16356</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-16356</guid>
		<description>Scott:
Catching up on your blog and going to finally download that pdf from Javitz, NYC. The seminar was great and totally using things I learned that day every day since.
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott:<br />
Catching up on your blog and going to finally download that pdf from Javitz, NYC. The seminar was great and totally using things I learned that day every day since.<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-15904</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-15904</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

I am remiss in not navigating here earlier. Like all the rest, could you email me the missing .PDF from NYC?

As important as the informatiojn was, the humor aspect was what made it all &#039;click&#039;. Thanks for poking fun at Adobe and yourself. We *all* need a piece of crow pie to balance our diet!

Coop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>I am remiss in not navigating here earlier. Like all the rest, could you email me the missing .PDF from NYC?</p>
<p>As important as the informatiojn was, the humor aspect was what made it all &#8216;click&#8217;. Thanks for poking fun at Adobe and yourself. We *all* need a piece of crow pie to balance our diet!</p>
<p>Coop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Lou Turbin</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-14946</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Lou Turbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-14946</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Attended the great seminar at the Javits Center in NYC.  Where are the missing PDF pages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Attended the great seminar at the Javits Center in NYC.  Where are the missing PDF pages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Graphic Vision</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-14018</link>
		<dc:creator>New Graphic Vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-14018</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott where is the PDF download for the missing pages in our books for the last photoshop seminar in NY???
Gustavo Carrillo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott where is the PDF download for the missing pages in our books for the last photoshop seminar in NY???<br />
Gustavo Carrillo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-13676</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-13676</guid>
		<description>Scott - I&#039;d very much like to use your great &quot;Instant Frame Effect&quot;, but find that I wasn&#039;t fast enough to capture in my notes your live run-through of each step-by-step detail to even make it to Step 3.  Any chance you could provide the specifics to flesh out the workbook&#039;s Steps 1 &amp; 2, particularly Step 1?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; I&#8217;d very much like to use your great &#8220;Instant Frame Effect&#8221;, but find that I wasn&#8217;t fast enough to capture in my notes your live run-through of each step-by-step detail to even make it to Step 3.  Any chance you could provide the specifics to flesh out the workbook&#8217;s Steps 1 &amp; 2, particularly Step 1?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morris Brodkey</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-13617</link>
		<dc:creator>Morris Brodkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-13617</guid>
		<description>I attended your photoshop show in New York. It was liike watching magic!

Is there a way to download the images you used for illustrations so that I can go over them in the workbook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended your photoshop show in New York. It was liike watching magic!</p>
<p>Is there a way to download the images you used for illustrations so that I can go over them in the workbook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-13615</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-13615</guid>
		<description>Scott â€“ Great session in NY.  On the questions raised about LR versus Photoshop CS2/3:  Iâ€™d like to suggest that the primary issue is the need to clarify what processing steps can better, or only, be done using CS2/3 as compared to LR (or visa versa).  I think itâ€™s pretty clear that LRâ€™s Develop module is equivalent to CS3â€™s RAW, and that LR is far superior to Bridge for performing photo organizational and retrieval tasks.  But processing capabilities are another matter.  As you know, there are functions in CS2/3 that are not available in LR (or are better done in CS2/3).    For example, cloning and healing can only be done in CS.  And sharpening and cropping are more easily and precisely accomplished in CS (still the case with LR 1.1?).   The fundamental question is:  why &amp; when should a photographer use CS if they make full use of LRâ€™s capabilities?  A task by task comparison would be very helpful.  Hope your November 19 session specifically addresses this. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott â€“ Great session in NY.  On the questions raised about LR versus Photoshop CS2/3:  Iâ€™d like to suggest that the primary issue is the need to clarify what processing steps can better, or only, be done using CS2/3 as compared to LR (or visa versa).  I think itâ€™s pretty clear that LRâ€™s Develop module is equivalent to CS3â€™s RAW, and that LR is far superior to Bridge for performing photo organizational and retrieval tasks.  But processing capabilities are another matter.  As you know, there are functions in CS2/3 that are not available in LR (or are better done in CS2/3).    For example, cloning and healing can only be done in CS.  And sharpening and cropping are more easily and precisely accomplished in CS (still the case with LR 1.1?).   The fundamental question is:  why &amp; when should a photographer use CS if they make full use of LRâ€™s capabilities?  A task by task comparison would be very helpful.  Hope your November 19 session specifically addresses this. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-13239</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-13239</guid>
		<description>Great spending some &#039;personal&#039; time with you in NY. I was crazy enough to come running 101 fever and left at lunch, so didn&#039;t have a chance to say hi. But, had a great time while it lasted. Love your enthusiasm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great spending some &#8216;personal&#8217; time with you in NY. I was crazy enough to come running 101 fever and left at lunch, so didn&#8217;t have a chance to say hi. But, had a great time while it lasted. Love your enthusiasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolph</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-13130</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-13130</guid>
		<description>In reply that I am stupid for using Aperture...
I happen to like Aperture and hope for an update to 2.0 that will set back Lightroom to be honest. 

Look at this video of Scott Kelby in relation to an upcoming new version:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH9Vhufg_0U

I totally agree with him (happens more than once to be honest) Escpecially with the long: Nooooo! :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply that I am stupid for using Aperture&#8230;<br />
I happen to like Aperture and hope for an update to 2.0 that will set back Lightroom to be honest. </p>
<p>Look at this video of Scott Kelby in relation to an upcoming new version:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH9Vhufg_0U" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH9Vhufg_0U</a></p>
<p>I totally agree with him (happens more than once to be honest) Escpecially with the long: Nooooo! <img src='http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned Leary</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-13091</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-13091</guid>
		<description>Scott, I like to shoot waterfowl but often capture blurry birds...which would be better to correct this issue, Lightroom or Bridge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I like to shoot waterfowl but often capture blurry birds&#8230;which would be better to correct this issue, Lightroom or Bridge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roup</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-13050</link>
		<dc:creator>Roup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 04:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/713#comment-13050</guid>
		<description>I would like to say thank you.  I was pushed away from Photoshop because I wasn&#039;t understanding layer, but now I feel much more strong.  You made layers and levels easy for me.   Now, I had one questions.  I use Google Picasa for my photo management software, what do you use, or what does the pros uses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to say thank you.  I was pushed away from Photoshop because I wasn&#8217;t understanding layer, but now I feel much more strong.  You made layers and levels easy for me.   Now, I had one questions.  I use Google Picasa for my photo management software, what do you use, or what does the pros uses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
