<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday News Wrap-up</title>
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for personal friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mike P</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-24090</link>
		<author>Mike P</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-24090</guid>
		<description>First off... it must be a good day with the Bucs clinching a playoff spot and getting their first kickoff return for a touchdown.  I mean I love photography and photoshop and everything else, but we've got to remember there are also other important things in life... like football.

I was wondering if you could talk about RAW formats.  Specifically I was wondering what the benefits are to DNG versus staying with the original RAW format (which for me would be NEF).  I've heard the position that DNG is, or will soon be, a "standard", but with NEF and CR2 being so widely accepted are there any other benefits to converting to DNG?

Thanks for all the insights and info you've already passed on.  It is much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off&#8230; it must be a good day with the Bucs clinching a playoff spot and getting their first kickoff return for a touchdown.  I mean I love photography and photoshop and everything else, but we&#8217;ve got to remember there are also other important things in life&#8230; like football.</p>
<p>I was wondering if you could talk about RAW formats.  Specifically I was wondering what the benefits are to DNG versus staying with the original RAW format (which for me would be NEF).  I&#8217;ve heard the position that DNG is, or will soon be, a &#8220;standard&#8221;, but with NEF and CR2 being so widely accepted are there any other benefits to converting to DNG?</p>
<p>Thanks for all the insights and info you&#8217;ve already passed on.  It is much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-24045</link>
		<author>Dennis Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-24045</guid>
		<description>Scott;

I don't have alot of money to get the full photoshop, so I have PSE6. Can thee 7 points be translated for PSE6? Also, I see that some of your PSE6 books have not come out yet. Is it too late to incorporate the 7 points into into one of these PSE6 books? I don't mind buyng the book, but it would be good to have it PSE6 spacific. I have been told by folks that it is not easy to take the process to PSE6. Anyway, I was just wondering if can be done. thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have alot of money to get the full photoshop, so I have PSE6. Can thee 7 points be translated for PSE6? Also, I see that some of your PSE6 books have not come out yet. Is it too late to incorporate the 7 points into into one of these PSE6 books? I don&#8217;t mind buyng the book, but it would be good to have it PSE6 spacific. I have been told by folks that it is not easy to take the process to PSE6. Anyway, I was just wondering if can be done. thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-24040</link>
		<author>Peter</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-24040</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

When I look at the comments on this post, I noticed that my previous comment  indicates that it is awaiting moderation. Sorry about that. It appears that I may have put to many URL links. 

Anyways, I do want to add another to my NAPP member portfolio - http://www.photoshopuser.com/members/portfolios/view/main/791376

Where I have posted a before and after images of Jefferson's Monticello. I used the 7-Point system to creat the second image.

Maybe I should have done a better job cropping or even removed some items via cloning, but I just wanted to show the dramatic change by following your suggestions.

I know that ALL my images will go through THE System.

Thanks for writing the book and putting the system together.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>When I look at the comments on this post, I noticed that my previous comment  indicates that it is awaiting moderation. Sorry about that. It appears that I may have put to many URL links. </p>
<p>Anyways, I do want to add another to my NAPP member portfolio - <a href="http://www.photoshopuser.com/members/portfolios/view/main/791376" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoshopuser.com/members/portfolios/view/main/791376</a></p>
<p>Where I have posted a before and after images of Jefferson&#8217;s Monticello. I used the 7-Point system to creat the second image.</p>
<p>Maybe I should have done a better job cropping or even removed some items via cloning, but I just wanted to show the dramatic change by following your suggestions.</p>
<p>I know that ALL my images will go through THE System.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing the book and putting the system together.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23994</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23994</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out the ad on Apple’s website.
Although it does get tiring to hear Apple on their bashing spree.
There’s two ways to make yourself higher than someone else: You can either elevate yourself, or tear down someone else. They both achieve the same goal, but one method is not very nice.

Apple has already elevated themselves on so many levels. Do they need to constantly tear into the PC’s?
It’s just tiring and poor marketing at this point.
Oh well.

***edit: fixed the spelling errors above*** ::how embarassing::</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out the ad on Apple’s website.<br />
Although it does get tiring to hear Apple on their bashing spree.<br />
There’s two ways to make yourself higher than someone else: You can either elevate yourself, or tear down someone else. They both achieve the same goal, but one method is not very nice.</p>
<p>Apple has already elevated themselves on so many levels. Do they need to constantly tear into the PC’s?<br />
It’s just tiring and poor marketing at this point.<br />
Oh well.</p>
<p>***edit: fixed the spelling errors above*** ::how embarassing::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23993</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23993</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out the as on Apple's website.
Although it does get tiring to hear Apple on their bashing spree.
There's two ways to mae yourself higher than someone else: You can either elevate yourself, or tear down someone else. They both achieve the same goal, but one method is not very nice.

Apple has already elevated themselves on so many levels. Do they need to constantly tear into the PC's?
It's just tiring and poor marketing at this point.
Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out the as on Apple&#8217;s website.<br />
Although it does get tiring to hear Apple on their bashing spree.<br />
There&#8217;s two ways to mae yourself higher than someone else: You can either elevate yourself, or tear down someone else. They both achieve the same goal, but one method is not very nice.</p>
<p>Apple has already elevated themselves on so many levels. Do they need to constantly tear into the PC&#8217;s?<br />
It&#8217;s just tiring and poor marketing at this point.<br />
Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23979</link>
		<author>Thomas</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23979</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,

in addition to Jason's comment (15.12.08, 10.12am): I would also suggest to add an additional chapter (or probably better an appendix) on how to setup and configure systems, esp. CS3. I think it would be helpful for readers to have a little appendix to learn about the configurations you recommend (CS3 preferences, monitor calibaration, some important camera setups and so on) for your 7 point system.

Greatings from Singapore and I really enjoyed your book - the 7 point system rocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,</p>
<p>in addition to Jason&#8217;s comment (15.12.08, 10.12am): I would also suggest to add an additional chapter (or probably better an appendix) on how to setup and configure systems, esp. CS3. I think it would be helpful for readers to have a little appendix to learn about the configurations you recommend (CS3 preferences, monitor calibaration, some important camera setups and so on) for your 7 point system.</p>
<p>Greatings from Singapore and I really enjoyed your book - the 7 point system rocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23908</link>
		<author>Jason</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23908</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,

Congrats on the recognition and accolades on your new 7 Point System book.  If it's not under the tree for me or in my stocking, it's definitely on my short list of things to get after the holidays.  I did have a question though:  it seems like from what you've indicated on Photoshop user TV and other promotional materials that the system is a workflow.  How transparent is that workflow?  For example, some people will have CS3, while others use Lightroom, or a combination of the two.  Still others aren't in that software setup yet, (like myself with only CS2) and perhaps are even using something like Elements, or Corel's Paintshop Pro or some other program like the GIMP.  You had mentioned a few months ago that you've moved almost completely over to Lightroom for your personal photography, so I would imagine it's pretty compatible with both LR and CS3, but what about other setups?  How usable is the 7 point system in alternative environments.  I know, Adobe Photoshop CS3 is rapidly becoming the new standard, but we're not all there yet, so was curious what your recommendation is for those interested in the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,</p>
<p>Congrats on the recognition and accolades on your new 7 Point System book.  If it&#8217;s not under the tree for me or in my stocking, it&#8217;s definitely on my short list of things to get after the holidays.  I did have a question though:  it seems like from what you&#8217;ve indicated on Photoshop user TV and other promotional materials that the system is a workflow.  How transparent is that workflow?  For example, some people will have CS3, while others use Lightroom, or a combination of the two.  Still others aren&#8217;t in that software setup yet, (like myself with only CS2) and perhaps are even using something like Elements, or Corel&#8217;s Paintshop Pro or some other program like the GIMP.  You had mentioned a few months ago that you&#8217;ve moved almost completely over to Lightroom for your personal photography, so I would imagine it&#8217;s pretty compatible with both LR and CS3, but what about other setups?  How usable is the 7 point system in alternative environments.  I know, Adobe Photoshop CS3 is rapidly becoming the new standard, but we&#8217;re not all there yet, so was curious what your recommendation is for those interested in the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Makarov</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23850</link>
		<author>Ivan Makarov</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23850</guid>
		<description>Scott - 

Here is the link to my review - 

http://www.imdigitalphoto.com/2007/11/7-point-system-by-scott-kelby.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott - </p>
<p>Here is the link to my review - </p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdigitalphoto.com/2007/11/7-point-system-by-scott-kelby.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdigitalphoto.com/2007/11/7-point-system-by-scott-kelby.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23773</link>
		<author>Peter</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23773</guid>
		<description>Scott,
I’m going to be a PR guy for NAPP.

I noticed that several of your blog followers have made comments that they were not NAPP members. It got me wondering, why not?

When I joined NAPP a few years ago, I was wondering, am I going to get anything out of this.

I can now answer my own question with a very firm YES.

I have saved enough on the NAPP discounts to actually pay for the membership itself since I joined and for the next couple of years.
The answers to some  of the request made by individuals on this blog can be found in the NAPP only sections of the NAPP website and the help obtained from the forum members such as Glyn Dewis are amongst the best available anywhere. There are over 110,000 posts with questions and helpful information.

Other's visiting this blog should also check out  -
Matt K's latest Lightroom blog -http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/
Dave Cross’s at http://davecross.blogspot.com/ ,where you can get  MUNKED :)
Watch the master, Bert Monroy , at work on The Laddie's and RC's podcast- Layers TV 

The whole NAPP group "Rocks" and is a reflection of your leadership.

End of Commercial.

“Scott’s School of hard knocks” – I bet a blog post on this subject similar to your input for the intro would generate record level comments. We have all been there and some more than others  

Actually, may make a good book – a book whose content is entirely based on input from your readers with “how too avoids” from you and your Pro Photo buddies. 

I know enough already, last question is - “Scott Kelby Boutique” going to be a permanent URL that we can link to ?

Thanks
Regards,
Peter – BTW a “Canon Guy”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
I’m going to be a PR guy for NAPP.</p>
<p>I noticed that several of your blog followers have made comments that they were not NAPP members. It got me wondering, why not?</p>
<p>When I joined NAPP a few years ago, I was wondering, am I going to get anything out of this.</p>
<p>I can now answer my own question with a very firm YES.</p>
<p>I have saved enough on the NAPP discounts to actually pay for the membership itself since I joined and for the next couple of years.<br />
The answers to some  of the request made by individuals on this blog can be found in the NAPP only sections of the NAPP website and the help obtained from the forum members such as Glyn Dewis are amongst the best available anywhere. There are over 110,000 posts with questions and helpful information.</p>
<p>Other&#8217;s visiting this blog should also check out  -<br />
Matt K&#8217;s latest Lightroom blog -http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/<br />
Dave Cross’s at <a href="http://davecross.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://davecross.blogspot.com/</a> ,where you can get  MUNKED <img src='http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Watch the master, Bert Monroy , at work on The Laddie&#8217;s and RC&#8217;s podcast- Layers TV </p>
<p>The whole NAPP group &#8220;Rocks&#8221; and is a reflection of your leadership.</p>
<p>End of Commercial.</p>
<p>“Scott’s School of hard knocks” – I bet a blog post on this subject similar to your input for the intro would generate record level comments. We have all been there and some more than others  </p>
<p>Actually, may make a good book – a book whose content is entirely based on input from your readers with “how too avoids” from you and your Pro Photo buddies. </p>
<p>I know enough already, last question is - “Scott Kelby Boutique” going to be a permanent URL that we can link to ?</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Regards,<br />
Peter – BTW a “Canon Guy”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Hollon</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23771</link>
		<author>Jane Hollon</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23771</guid>
		<description>I just got your 7 steps book waiting for my upgrade to CS3 to get to me next!  I have to tell you Andie Smith sold me on your books about a yr ago.  So you owe her several big thanks; and from what I've got to play with the new book is smack dab on, even just doing what I can in CS2 my photos have went from ok to fabulous thank you so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got your 7 steps book waiting for my upgrade to CS3 to get to me next!  I have to tell you Andie Smith sold me on your books about a yr ago.  So you owe her several big thanks; and from what I&#8217;ve got to play with the new book is smack dab on, even just doing what I can in CS2 my photos have went from ok to fabulous thank you so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23766</link>
		<author>Victoria</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23766</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott
Thanks so much for plugging Sean's class here at the Lepp Institute. I can't wait to have his expertise here again. His classes are always a hit and always full of eager learners!  Hopefully one of these days we will see your name featured here too! We get enough requests anyway!
Sounds like you have been busy and loving it! Keep up the great stuff over there and don't forget to get some sleep!
Take care and Merry Christmas,
Victoria Schmitt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott<br />
Thanks so much for plugging Sean&#8217;s class here at the Lepp Institute. I can&#8217;t wait to have his expertise here again. His classes are always a hit and always full of eager learners!  Hopefully one of these days we will see your name featured here too! We get enough requests anyway!<br />
Sounds like you have been busy and loving it! Keep up the great stuff over there and don&#8217;t forget to get some sleep!<br />
Take care and Merry Christmas,<br />
Victoria Schmitt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glyn Dewis</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23755</link>
		<author>Glyn Dewis</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2007/archives/814#comment-23755</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,

Whatever next for the Kelby Enterprise huh :o) Seriously though, all this recognition is testament to the quality of product you continue to put out there for us all.

Thanks for your dedication throughout 2007 in providing some of the best teaching material on the market, and here's to an amazing 2008!

All the best to you and yours,
Glyn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,</p>
<p>Whatever next for the Kelby Enterprise huh :o) Seriously though, all this recognition is testament to the quality of product you continue to put out there for us all.</p>
<p>Thanks for your dedication throughout 2007 in providing some of the best teaching material on the market, and here&#8217;s to an amazing 2008!</p>
<p>All the best to you and yours,<br />
Glyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
