<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday News Wrap-up (and a &#8220;Scott Thinks It&#8217;s Hot&#8221; Award Winner!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:12:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LarryEiss.com Welcomes You! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on JPEG vs. RAW</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-59859</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryEiss.com Welcomes You! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on JPEG vs. RAW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 01:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-59859</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott Kelby [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott Kelby [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah McNamara</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-41589</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah McNamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-41589</guid>
		<description>Dear scott,
                 I bought Vizeza and I have big version of 3.0 filters and 2.0 noise reducer. Why do I need Vizeza. I have used it and it does not seen that hot. I can do the same with the new 3.0 filters. What am I messing. Deborah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear scott,<br />
                 I bought Vizeza and I have big version of 3.0 filters and 2.0 noise reducer. Why do I need Vizeza. I have used it and it does not seen that hot. I can do the same with the new 3.0 filters. What am I messing. Deborah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iris Muranaka</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-41082</link>
		<dc:creator>Iris Muranaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-41082</guid>
		<description>Scott, I recently purchased the Viveza plug-in and wow, it absolutely is a kick-butt product! It was worth the investment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I recently purchased the Viveza plug-in and wow, it absolutely is a kick-butt product! It was worth the investment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip Santo</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-41061</link>
		<dc:creator>Skip Santo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-41061</guid>
		<description>Actually Nikon&#039;s Capture Nx Software, which can be used by other than Nikon camera owners, has had this same technology in their software for at least a couple of years ago. What&#039;s different with this new Vivenza it&#039;s now available as a plugin to Photoshop instead of a stand alone program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Nikon&#8217;s Capture Nx Software, which can be used by other than Nikon camera owners, has had this same technology in their software for at least a couple of years ago. What&#8217;s different with this new Vivenza it&#8217;s now available as a plugin to Photoshop instead of a stand alone program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatiana Boyle</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-39429</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatiana Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-39429</guid>
		<description>Nikon Capture is based on U-point as well. Will I need Capture after that? Although, $249 is indeed steep. The first release of Aperture 1.0 was priced in the range of $400 or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon Capture is based on U-point as well. Will I need Capture after that? Although, $249 is indeed steep. The first release of Aperture 1.0 was priced in the range of $400 or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-39329</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-39329</guid>
		<description>Viveza looks amazing - very much like the Lightroom Targeted Adjustment tools - One wonders how long it will be before this plug in will be a module available in Lightroom - seems like the ideal answer to local adjustments -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viveza looks amazing &#8211; very much like the Lightroom Targeted Adjustment tools &#8211; One wonders how long it will be before this plug in will be a module available in Lightroom &#8211; seems like the ideal answer to local adjustments -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viveza for Photoshop &#124; Trash The Dress Part 2 &#124; Dave Cross Tutorial &#38; More &#124; Layers Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-39037</link>
		<dc:creator>Viveza for Photoshop &#124; Trash The Dress Part 2 &#124; Dave Cross Tutorial &#38; More &#124; Layers Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 05:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-39037</guid>
		<description>[...] member website, and check for the discount there. The software is amazingly cool, even garnering a Scott Thinks Its Hot Award. Be sure to stop by the NAPP site, or for more information on the plugin click on the link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] member website, and check for the discount there. The software is amazingly cool, even garnering a Scott Thinks Its Hot Award. Be sure to stop by the NAPP site, or for more information on the plugin click on the link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Frazier</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-36863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Frazier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-36863</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

I agree with the above poster, this would be a KILLER Lightroom addition. Having this capability within lightroom would be a dream, hopefully Nik will make this a plug-in for Lightroom. 

I hope NAPP will have a discount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>I agree with the above poster, this would be a KILLER Lightroom addition. Having this capability within lightroom would be a dream, hopefully Nik will make this a plug-in for Lightroom. </p>
<p>I hope NAPP will have a discount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wick Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-36612</link>
		<dc:creator>Wick Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-36612</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also concerned about the price. I&#039;m glad to hear this is an effective plug-in, but $249 is a lot of money for a cool interface to functions that PhotoShop already provides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also concerned about the price. I&#8217;m glad to hear this is an effective plug-in, but $249 is a lot of money for a cool interface to functions that PhotoShop already provides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramelli</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-36457</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-36457</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr Kelby,
This looks to be a great plug in ! I will check out what this U tech mentionned there.

Keep up the good work, and I love your show and your humour. It is so entertaining, I think I have all your books and it took my pictures to a whole new level !

tks again,

Serge 
www.photoserge.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Kelby,<br />
This looks to be a great plug in ! I will check out what this U tech mentionned there.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work, and I love your show and your humour. It is so entertaining, I think I have all your books and it took my pictures to a whole new level !</p>
<p>tks again,</p>
<p>Serge<br />
<a href="http://www.photoserge.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoserge.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Langdon</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-36445</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Langdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-36445</guid>
		<description>Scott, doesn&#039;t anybody else think this feature would make lightroom unstoppable!!  I would be so geeked up if they could include this in the develop module in lightroom!!  Please I hope Adobe is listening to this!!  Now that would truly cut my workflow in half!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, doesn&#8217;t anybody else think this feature would make lightroom unstoppable!!  I would be so geeked up if they could include this in the develop module in lightroom!!  Please I hope Adobe is listening to this!!  Now that would truly cut my workflow in half!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrie Brewer</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015/comment-page-1#comment-36343</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrie Brewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1015#comment-36343</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott - I just got back from Vegas too! That&#039;s twice we&#039;ve been in the same town at the same time this year (Disney marathon too). I&#039;ll be going to Europe in May. Want to have lunch or something then? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott &#8211; I just got back from Vegas too! That&#8217;s twice we&#8217;ve been in the same town at the same time this year (Disney marathon too). I&#8217;ll be going to Europe in May. Want to have lunch or something then? <img src='http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
