<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day 3: Lighting Gear Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:48:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rahul</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-184894</link>
		<dc:creator>rahul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-184894</guid>
		<description>hiiiii</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hiiiii</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rahul</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-184893</link>
		<dc:creator>rahul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-184893</guid>
		<description>hiii ser who r u</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hiii ser who r u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professional Snapshots &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Studio Strobes and Setup for Beginners: Choosing Your Strobes</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-66447</link>
		<dc:creator>Professional Snapshots &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Studio Strobes and Setup for Beginners: Choosing Your Strobes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-66447</guid>
		<description>[...] in continuous light, check out a great description of popular continuous lights by Scott Kelby here (picture shown [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in continuous light, check out a great description of popular continuous lights by Scott Kelby here (picture shown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-61393</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-61393</guid>
		<description>I purchased my spiderlight kit and installed them in my studio.  They came very highly recomended by my local camera store.  I wish I had checked out this website before spending 2000 dollars for lights that make me set my ISO high.  It all sound great but just not worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased my spiderlight kit and installed them in my studio.  They came very highly recomended by my local camera store.  I wish I had checked out this website before spending 2000 dollars for lights that make me set my ISO high.  It all sound great but just not worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pattie Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-55253</link>
		<dc:creator>Pattie Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 06:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-55253</guid>
		<description>I shot with the canon 1d mark iii.  I currently use flash / strobe and I am a bit scared to switch over to continious lighting.  I borrowed a friends 2 light kit (each 1000watts) made by Amvona.com and even at 400 iso f2.8 and a shutter speed of 90 my photos still looked dark.  

Is there a difference in brands when it comes to the quality and quanity of light...even when they both claim to be 1000 watt tungsten?

what should i shot at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shot with the canon 1d mark iii.  I currently use flash / strobe and I am a bit scared to switch over to continious lighting.  I borrowed a friends 2 light kit (each 1000watts) made by Amvona.com and even at 400 iso f2.8 and a shutter speed of 90 my photos still looked dark.  </p>
<p>Is there a difference in brands when it comes to the quality and quanity of light&#8230;even when they both claim to be 1000 watt tungsten?</p>
<p>what should i shot at?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plez Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-46938</link>
		<dc:creator>Plez Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-46938</guid>
		<description>Yes, please respond to Craig Leonard&#039;s comments above. I am looking at getting a TD 5 or portraits, but I am concerned about the limited lighting. I have a Canon 24-70mm L lens F2.8. Will the TD 5 work as a fill with a 580 EX flash or should I use the TD 5 and TD 3 in combination. What are my alternatives since I am on a limited budget. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, please respond to Craig Leonard&#8217;s comments above. I am looking at getting a TD 5 or portraits, but I am concerned about the limited lighting. I have a Canon 24-70mm L lens F2.8. Will the TD 5 work as a fill with a 580 EX flash or should I use the TD 5 and TD 3 in combination. What are my alternatives since I am on a limited budget. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Chamberlain</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-43942</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Chamberlain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-43942</guid>
		<description>Scott,
On your March 6 post re getting the gritty look in Camera Raw/Bridge, you showed a photo of your band, onto which you applied the &quot;look&quot;. But then you said, &quot;Hereâ€™s the problem; the effect in Camera Raw looked â€œOKâ€ but it just wasnâ€™t really looking right, so instead I ran the Lucis Art plug-in on it, and BAMâ€”it was there! &quot;

I&#039;ve since purchased Lucis Art, and as you know, it has a number of different effects. Could you tell me which of the specific effects you used, e.g., was it Exposure, and if so, what were you settings?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
On your March 6 post re getting the gritty look in Camera Raw/Bridge, you showed a photo of your band, onto which you applied the &#8220;look&#8221;. But then you said, &#8220;Hereâ€™s the problem; the effect in Camera Raw looked â€œOKâ€ but it just wasnâ€™t really looking right, so instead I ran the Lucis Art plug-in on it, and BAMâ€”it was there! &#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve since purchased Lucis Art, and as you know, it has a number of different effects. Could you tell me which of the specific effects you used, e.g., was it Exposure, and if so, what were you settings?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LED Cube - &#187; The Plumen Project</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-43650</link>
		<dc:creator>LED Cube - &#187; The Plumen Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-43650</guid>
		<description>[...] Photoshop Insider &#8221; Day 3: Lighting Gear Week    Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photoshop Insider &#8221; Day 3: Lighting Gear Week    Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-42279</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-42279</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had good results with the Spiderlites, but they are hard to work with when photographing children.  For portraits and still life, they are great, especially since they give off next to no heat.   I bought my bulbs (with the same specs 5500K, 27 watts as the Westcott lights) at http://www.handhelditems.com/5500k-color-corrected-light-fluorescent-lamp-photo-bulb-p-5711.html for $6.99 each. 

I haven&#039;t checked the specs for the TD5 to see what the maximum wattage is for the bulbs.  I see that http://www.obuynow.com/photobulbs.html has CFL bulbs listed of 40W and 80W power.  I&#039;d be interested to hear if anyone has tried these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had good results with the Spiderlites, but they are hard to work with when photographing children.  For portraits and still life, they are great, especially since they give off next to no heat.   I bought my bulbs (with the same specs 5500K, 27 watts as the Westcott lights) at <a href="http://www.handhelditems.com/5500k-color-corrected-light-fluorescent-lamp-photo-bulb-p-5711.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.handhelditems.com/5500k-color-corrected-light-fluorescent-lamp-photo-bulb-p-5711.html</a> for $6.99 each. </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t checked the specs for the TD5 to see what the maximum wattage is for the bulbs.  I see that <a href="http://www.obuynow.com/photobulbs.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.obuynow.com/photobulbs.html</a> has CFL bulbs listed of 40W and 80W power.  I&#8217;d be interested to hear if anyone has tried these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-41736</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-41736</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I recently got the TD5 along with a reflector. 
It seems that it is way too dark to shoot with my Canon EFS 17-85 IS  (1:4-5.6) lens. In order to make it work I have to shoot at 5.6, 1/15 which are not &quot;tact&quot; sharp with my kids, tripod or not. 
So I am forced to shoot with my 50mm 1.8 lens. I have been shooting with an f stop of 1.8 and a shutter speed of 1/125 at ISO 400. This turns out some pretty good shots but obviously I am very limited in how much I can get in focus.
Any tips on what I can do. I have been shooting with the TD5 a couple feet forward of the subjects on the left side, and the reflector on the right side. 
By the way, I loved both of the Digital Photography books.
Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I recently got the TD5 along with a reflector.<br />
It seems that it is way too dark to shoot with my Canon EFS 17-85 IS  (1:4-5.6) lens. In order to make it work I have to shoot at 5.6, 1/15 which are not &#8220;tact&#8221; sharp with my kids, tripod or not.<br />
So I am forced to shoot with my 50mm 1.8 lens. I have been shooting with an f stop of 1.8 and a shutter speed of 1/125 at ISO 400. This turns out some pretty good shots but obviously I am very limited in how much I can get in focus.<br />
Any tips on what I can do. I have been shooting with the TD5 a couple feet forward of the subjects on the left side, and the reflector on the right side.<br />
By the way, I loved both of the Digital Photography books.<br />
Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-41273</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-41273</guid>
		<description>Great series of posts on lighting, thanks Scott!!  I&#039;m adding this to my favorite links for lighting tips.  In fact I just added the blog to my RSS feeds.  

I&#039;d encourage anyone reading to also visit http://www.planetneil.com/tangents for a bunch of great lighting tutorials that really reinforce the same things you&#039;ve said here.

Maggie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great series of posts on lighting, thanks Scott!!  I&#8217;m adding this to my favorite links for lighting tips.  In fact I just added the blog to my RSS feeds.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d encourage anyone reading to also visit <a href="http://www.planetneil.com/tangents" rel="nofollow">http://www.planetneil.com/tangents</a> for a bunch of great lighting tutorials that really reinforce the same things you&#8217;ve said here.</p>
<p>Maggie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152/comment-page-1#comment-41269</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1152#comment-41269</guid>
		<description>Yeah, My question was on the Fluorescent Lights too.  I really didn&#039;t see a difference between Westcott bulb and this bulb on amazon.

http://www.amazon.com/Spiral-Medium-Standard-Maxlite-Light/dp/B00149L4GU

Is there really a difference between them that makes one $30 more expensive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, My question was on the Fluorescent Lights too.  I really didn&#8217;t see a difference between Westcott bulb and this bulb on amazon.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Spiral-Medium-Standard-Maxlite-Light/dp/B00149L4GU" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Spiral-Medium-Standard-Maxlite-Light/dp/B00149L4GU</a></p>
<p>Is there really a difference between them that makes one $30 more expensive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
