<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday News Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42613</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42613</guid>
		<description>Hi Pat:
Thanks so much for voicing your concern about the content pages slipping vs. paid ad pages. This is something we keep a very close eye on, for just the reasons you mentioned in your comment.

You will be happy to know that the number of content pages from last year has grown significantly (it doesn't do any good to count the ad pages, if you don't count the contents pages, which is what we both care about most). 

For example: 

â€¢ The April/May 2007 issue had 67 pages of content 
â€¢ The April/May 2008 issue has 93 pages of content

That's a content increase of 39% year-over-year. 

But beyond that; having a healthy magazine with robust paid advertising is actually very important for our members. Here's why: When we launched NAPP 10 years ago, Photoshop User was only published four times a year. The first issue was only 36 pages, and NAPP membership was $99. 

Today, 10 years later, it's published 8 times a year, it's over 100+ pages, but your NAPP membership is still only $99. I can't think of many things that cost the same today as they did back in the 1990s, and part of the reason is that we sell advertising in Photoshop User. 

Paper costs have risen nearly 40% in just the past two years, and postal rates costs have gone up considerably as well, but we still haven't raised membership dues, and each year we add more content, more values to the web site, more discounts, and plain more of everything without raising the membership dues a penny. It's not easy to do, but we're really committed to making NAPP, and Photoshop User, the best value in Photoshop Training, Education, and News in the world. 

Pat, thanks for your concern (for keeping us honest), and for being a NAPP member. It means more to us that you might think. :)

All my best, 

-Scott Kelby
Editor and Publisher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pat:<br />
Thanks so much for voicing your concern about the content pages slipping vs. paid ad pages. This is something we keep a very close eye on, for just the reasons you mentioned in your comment.</p>
<p>You will be happy to know that the number of content pages from last year has grown significantly (it doesn&#8217;t do any good to count the ad pages, if you don&#8217;t count the contents pages, which is what we both care about most). </p>
<p>For example: </p>
<p>â€¢ The April/May 2007 issue had 67 pages of content<br />
â€¢ The April/May 2008 issue has 93 pages of content</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a content increase of 39% year-over-year. </p>
<p>But beyond that; having a healthy magazine with robust paid advertising is actually very important for our members. Here&#8217;s why: When we launched NAPP 10 years ago, Photoshop User was only published four times a year. The first issue was only 36 pages, and NAPP membership was $99. </p>
<p>Today, 10 years later, it&#8217;s published 8 times a year, it&#8217;s over 100+ pages, but your NAPP membership is still only $99. I can&#8217;t think of many things that cost the same today as they did back in the 1990s, and part of the reason is that we sell advertising in Photoshop User. </p>
<p>Paper costs have risen nearly 40% in just the past two years, and postal rates costs have gone up considerably as well, but we still haven&#8217;t raised membership dues, and each year we add more content, more values to the web site, more discounts, and plain more of everything without raising the membership dues a penny. It&#8217;s not easy to do, but we&#8217;re really committed to making NAPP, and Photoshop User, the best value in Photoshop Training, Education, and News in the world. </p>
<p>Pat, thanks for your concern (for keeping us honest), and for being a NAPP member. It means more to us that you might think. <img src='http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>All my best, </p>
<p>-Scott Kelby<br />
Editor and Publisher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KenL</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42399</link>
		<dc:creator>KenL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42399</guid>
		<description>I got one better than this..Go see. ITs about attitude

http://www.photoshopuser.com/members/portfolios/view/image/118031

Affectionately Photoshopuser
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got one better than this..Go see. ITs about attitude</p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopuser.com/members/portfolios/view/image/118031" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoshopuser.com/members/portfolios/view/image/118031</a></p>
<p>Affectionately Photoshopuser<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42389</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42389</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

The portfolio of Regis is really amazing.  Makes you think that he has some really good lenses or he defies living :)  Thanks for sharing.

Question for the Nikon 800 that you talk about from your previous post.  Where can we find it?

Cheers,
Gilles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>The portfolio of Regis is really amazing.  Makes you think that he has some really good lenses or he defies living <img src='http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks for sharing.</p>
<p>Question for the Nikon 800 that you talk about from your previous post.  Where can we find it?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Gilles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah McNamara</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42378</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah McNamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42378</guid>
		<description>Dear Scott,
                 When is your new book with Matt on Elemrnts 6 coming out. I have Photoshop, but I really want this book because I bought Elements 6 also. 

I have CS2 and I bought the 7 steps book, but when I make a digital negitive in lightroom it is not opening in CS2. Why?

I bought the new nike software for 199.00 when I was going to buy CS3 upgrade. I still do not see why I should use it if I have the new 3 filters.

I have a D50 Nikon why is D60 better. Deb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Scott,<br />
                 When is your new book with Matt on Elemrnts 6 coming out. I have Photoshop, but I really want this book because I bought Elements 6 also. </p>
<p>I have CS2 and I bought the 7 steps book, but when I make a digital negitive in lightroom it is not opening in CS2. Why?</p>
<p>I bought the new nike software for 199.00 when I was going to buy CS3 upgrade. I still do not see why I should use it if I have the new 3 filters.</p>
<p>I have a D50 Nikon why is D60 better. Deb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Mickle</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42371</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Mickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42371</guid>
		<description>Regarding the Preview Extractor program, you can already do this with iView Media Pro, albeit a with a little more complication .  Just create a catalog (make sure that the drives that the files from the catalog are available for iView to access) and then create a web gallery.

iView uses the embedded JPG in the RAW file to create the gallery. Just navigate to the large JPG file sub-folder in the folder created for the web page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Preview Extractor program, you can already do this with iView Media Pro, albeit a with a little more complication .  Just create a catalog (make sure that the drives that the files from the catalog are available for iView to access) and then create a web gallery.</p>
<p>iView uses the embedded JPG in the RAW file to create the gallery. Just navigate to the large JPG file sub-folder in the folder created for the web page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Weichmann</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42366</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Weichmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42366</guid>
		<description>Robert,

I have used it with my D200 and it is pretty handy.  I think it is fine with all newer NEF files. It just doesnt support anything before the D70 like the D100.  It doesnt alter the original NEF at all so its safe to try.

Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>I have used it with my D200 and it is pretty handy.  I think it is fine with all newer NEF files. It just doesnt support anything before the D70 like the D100.  It doesnt alter the original NEF at all so its safe to try.</p>
<p>Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42365</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42365</guid>
		<description>Has anyone used the preview extractor?  It appears to support one of the two cameras I have D70(s), but does it support the D300?  I shoot exclusively in RAW, and have to use Lightroom in order to get quick JPEGS - not normally a huge deal.  Would love feedback from anyone using this program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone used the preview extractor?  It appears to support one of the two cameras I have D70(s), but does it support the D300?  I shoot exclusively in RAW, and have to use Lightroom in order to get quick JPEGS - not normally a huge deal.  Would love feedback from anyone using this program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crist</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42364</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42364</guid>
		<description>I just got your book Photoshop CS3 for Digital Photographers. On page 7 it shows the option box "When a camera is connected, launch Adobe Photo Downloader".  I have PS CS3 with version 2.1.1.9 of Bridge and don't have this check box showing. What gives? I'd like to have the Bridge Downloader auto-launch to save me a few steps.  I also have Elements version 6 on my computer and it has the auto-launch feature checkbox. Should I uninstall Elements 6 (maybe a program conflict?). Help please.  Thanks.  Steve Crist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got your book Photoshop CS3 for Digital Photographers. On page 7 it shows the option box &#8220;When a camera is connected, launch Adobe Photo Downloader&#8221;.  I have PS CS3 with version 2.1.1.9 of Bridge and don&#8217;t have this check box showing. What gives? I&#8217;d like to have the Bridge Downloader auto-launch to save me a few steps.  I also have Elements version 6 on my computer and it has the auto-launch feature checkbox. Should I uninstall Elements 6 (maybe a program conflict?). Help please.  Thanks.  Steve Crist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat flanakin</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42358</link>
		<dc:creator>pat flanakin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42358</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Just a note while I was perusing the latest issue of Photoshop User magazine.  I noticed it was thicker than usual; then I counted the number of ad pages and this had increased from where it was a year ago.  I really do not care how thick the magazine gets, however, I would certainly hope that content isn't suffering for the fact that it seems the use of this magazine for ad profit appears to be increasing quite a bit.

Can you comment on this?

Thanks,
Pat in Houston</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Just a note while I was perusing the latest issue of Photoshop User magazine.  I noticed it was thicker than usual; then I counted the number of ad pages and this had increased from where it was a year ago.  I really do not care how thick the magazine gets, however, I would certainly hope that content isn&#8217;t suffering for the fact that it seems the use of this magazine for ad profit appears to be increasing quite a bit.</p>
<p>Can you comment on this?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Pat in Houston</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob DeChiara</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42354</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob DeChiara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42354</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott, just to follow up on Jame's post, yes very informative lighting week. Great info &#38; a great idea to help us lighting challenged folks. Counting down the days to PWC. With all that is going on that week (attending Laurie's pre-con, parties etc.) I hope I can squeeze 9 holes in some where. You're blog rocks &#38; well appreciated!! See ya in Orlando!

-Bob from Beantown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott, just to follow up on Jame&#8217;s post, yes very informative lighting week. Great info &amp; a great idea to help us lighting challenged folks. Counting down the days to PWC. With all that is going on that week (attending Laurie&#8217;s pre-con, parties etc.) I hope I can squeeze 9 holes in some where. You&#8217;re blog rocks &amp; well appreciated!! See ya in Orlando!</p>
<p>-Bob from Beantown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42350</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42350</guid>
		<description>Morning Scott,
Nikon's new site is super! it's about time they changed it.
Thanks for lighting week and have a blast at the Photoshop World Conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morning Scott,<br />
Nikon&#8217;s new site is super! it&#8217;s about time they changed it.<br />
Thanks for lighting week and have a blast at the Photoshop World Conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189/comment-page-1#comment-42347</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1189#comment-42347</guid>
		<description>oops, twice the same. sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, twice the same. sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
