<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom?</title>
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for personal friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: All About Photografi Link</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-74292</link>
		<author>All About Photografi Link</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-74292</guid>
		<description>[...] to Adobe BridgeYour Complete Guide to Adobe Bridge (PDF format)Photoshop Non-Destructive TechniquesCamera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom?The Beginner&#8217;s Guide to Lightroom and Photoshop (PDF format)Photoshop 101 Series Video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to Adobe BridgeYour Complete Guide to Adobe Bridge (PDF format)Photoshop Non-Destructive TechniquesCamera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom?The Beginner&#8217;s Guide to Lightroom and Photoshop (PDF format)Photoshop 101 Series Video [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 今日列表 &#124; News on Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-72394</link>
		<author>今日列表 &#124; News on Photography</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-72394</guid>
		<description>[...] Camera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Camera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pixinfo.com blog - Blog Archive - Camera Raw, Bridge, vagy Lightroom?</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-54259</link>
		<author>Pixinfo.com blog - Blog Archive - Camera Raw, Bridge, vagy Lightroom?</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-54259</guid>
		<description>[...] A bejegyzésben egy &#8220;interjú&#8221; is szerepel, amiből a &#8220;teljesen mindegy, ugyanaz mindegyik&#8221; részt emelném ki. A blogon bővebben kifejtik&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A bejegyzésben egy &#8220;interjú&#8221; is szerepel, amiből a &#8220;teljesen mindegy, ugyanaz mindegyik&#8221; részt emelném ki. A blogon bővebben kifejtik&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: binte.de &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Camera Raw, Bridge, oder Lightroom?</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53957</link>
		<author>binte.de &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Camera Raw, Bridge, oder Lightroom?</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53957</guid>
		<description>[...] Wer genau wie ich schon immer vor dieser Frage stand der sollte sich diesen Artikel von Scott Kelby einmal anschauen: Camera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Wer genau wie ich schon immer vor dieser Frage stand der sollte sich diesen Artikel von Scott Kelby einmal anschauen: Camera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Procesar raw... ¿Lightroom, Bridge o Camera Raw de Photoshop?</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53930</link>
		<author>Procesar raw... ¿Lightroom, Bridge o Camera Raw de Photoshop?</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53930</guid>
		<description>[...] Más información&#124; Photoshop Insider [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Más información| Photoshop Insider [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photography Voter, Digg de fotografía at ColetasSoft</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53877</link>
		<author>Photography Voter, Digg de fotografía at ColetasSoft</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53877</guid>
		<description>[...] Un Ejemplo, Camera Raw vs. Bridge vs. Lightroom. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Un Ejemplo, Camera Raw vs. Bridge vs. Lightroom. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby Fairchild</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53833</link>
		<author>Toby Fairchild</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53833</guid>
		<description>First of all, Akira, what do you mean by 'CS3'?  By that do you mean photoshop cs3? or the creative suite?  Secondly, what is "everything" you need to do?  Some photographers can get by just fine without photoshop....just using lightroom.  Depends on what you are going to use the photos for.  If you are going to use them in other mediums (i.e. print, web or video) you probably want to have photoshop nearby.  If you are strictly a photographer you may not have as big a need for photoshop, but then again I don't know any photographers personally, that don't have photoshop.  Think of it this way.  Lightroom  is an eyes, ears and throat doctor for your photos and photoshop is a brain surgeon.  Again, depends on what you want to do with your photos.  I have and use lightroom and photoshop depending on what the task at hand is.  I recommend subscribing to Kelby Trainings online video tutorials to help you better understand each of these programs, then you can better decide which way you want to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, Akira, what do you mean by &#8216;CS3&#8242;?  By that do you mean photoshop cs3? or the creative suite?  Secondly, what is &#8220;everything&#8221; you need to do?  Some photographers can get by just fine without photoshop&#8230;.just using lightroom.  Depends on what you are going to use the photos for.  If you are going to use them in other mediums (i.e. print, web or video) you probably want to have photoshop nearby.  If you are strictly a photographer you may not have as big a need for photoshop, but then again I don&#8217;t know any photographers personally, that don&#8217;t have photoshop.  Think of it this way.  Lightroom  is an eyes, ears and throat doctor for your photos and photoshop is a brain surgeon.  Again, depends on what you want to do with your photos.  I have and use lightroom and photoshop depending on what the task at hand is.  I recommend subscribing to Kelby Trainings online video tutorials to help you better understand each of these programs, then you can better decide which way you want to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Roundup 04-26-2008</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53807</link>
		<author>Link Roundup 04-26-2008</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53807</guid>
		<description>[...] Camera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom? Photoshop Insider Scott Kelby goes over the similarities and differences between RAW processors found in ACR, Bridge, and Lightroom. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Camera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom? Photoshop Insider Scott Kelby goes over the similarities and differences between RAW processors found in ACR, Bridge, and Lightroom. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photographyVoter.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53794</link>
		<author>photographyVoter.com</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53794</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Camera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Scott Kelby goes over the similarities and differences between RAW processors found in ACR, Bridge, and Lightroom....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Camera Raw, Bridge, or Lightroom?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Scott Kelby goes over the similarities and differences between RAW processors found in ACR, Bridge, and Lightroom&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News and Stuff (Gratuitous Rants included) &#124; PixelatedImage Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53785</link>
		<author>News and Stuff (Gratuitous Rants included) &#124; PixelatedImage Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53785</guid>
		<description>[...] string of comments on Scott&#8217;s blog that got a little heated. It all started because Scott made some comments about Lightroom and did not give corresponding comments about Apple&#8217;s Aperture. And it all went downhill from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] string of comments on Scott&#8217;s blog that got a little heated. It all started because Scott made some comments about Lightroom and did not give corresponding comments about Apple&#8217;s Aperture. And it all went downhill from [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akira</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53657</link>
		<author>akira</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 06:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53657</guid>
		<description>I'm still confused. If I get Lightroom do I still need CS3, or will Lightroom do "everything" I will need it to do (I shoot DNG raw)?
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still confused. If I get Lightroom do I still need CS3, or will Lightroom do &#8220;everything&#8221; I will need it to do (I shoot DNG raw)?<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby Fairchild</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53643</link>
		<author>Toby Fairchild</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 05:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1308#comment-53643</guid>
		<description>Regarding the differences between Lightroom and Adobe Bridge, They each have their own strengths and are designed to be used by two different groups of pixel pushers.  Lightroom is a fantastic program that addresses the workflow of photographers.  Adobe Bridge, on the other hand is a Godsend for graphic designers.  You can preview illustrator files, pdf files, movie files, flash files and on and on in Bridge.  You can't do that in Lightroom, nor should you want to.   For media professionals, Bridge is king.  For photographers, it's Lightroom.  Just because the camera raw feature overlaps in these two fine apps, I don't even see a need for a comparison because they are two totally different tools.  Kinda like arguing which is better a screw driver or a hammer.....depends on what you're trying to do.  Anyway, that's my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the differences between Lightroom and Adobe Bridge, They each have their own strengths and are designed to be used by two different groups of pixel pushers.  Lightroom is a fantastic program that addresses the workflow of photographers.  Adobe Bridge, on the other hand is a Godsend for graphic designers.  You can preview illustrator files, pdf files, movie files, flash files and on and on in Bridge.  You can&#8217;t do that in Lightroom, nor should you want to.   For media professionals, Bridge is king.  For photographers, it&#8217;s Lightroom.  Just because the camera raw feature overlaps in these two fine apps, I don&#8217;t even see a need for a comparison because they are two totally different tools.  Kinda like arguing which is better a screw driver or a hammer&#8230;..depends on what you&#8217;re trying to do.  Anyway, that&#8217;s my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
