Scott Will Post Later Today (Monday)
Jun. 16
5:30 am
There will be a post later today so be sure to check back this afternoon.
You know, it would be just as effective if Scott posted whenever he posted. You don’t need to tell us he’s not posting yet.
We’re not dying waiting…
And btw- for all of us reading via RSS, your notification of non-posting detracts, rather than adds, from the experience…
Actually, I appreciate good manners and consideration. Don’t let them discourage you, Scott.
Well said Tauratinzwe, Consideration and thoughts of others are hard to find today in a “I want it my way!” world.
Thanks Scott, You’re the Man!
I agree with Tauratinzwe dont listen to Kim Scott – some of us are dying waiting – gets my day off to the right start – but I think it is very professional and courteous when you let us know that on this very rare occasion you wont be posting till later in the day. it also stops us worrying that you might have fallen down a flight or stairs or been hit by a bus on the weekend. LOL
I for one are looking forward to your post later today.
I’m still trying to figure out how Scott’s one line post is detracting from the RSS experience. I use RSS for about 80 sites a day. Unless Kim is getting updates via email I don’t see how this is a factor. I think everyone else has nailed this in that when you typically post at the same time every day, it is only being courteous to the readers to let them know of a change in the normal schedule. I find comments like those from Kim to be amazingly crass and self-centered. Consider the fact that Scott does not HAVE to write a blog but chooses to because he likes to interact with his audience by providing industry news and information that he believes will be helpful to all of us. I put it to you, Kim, to go out and start up your own blog if you are in any way dissatisfied with the way Scott runs his. Only then will your comments hold any weight.
Jeff
i love that even your “non-post” can start up such a em….lively discussion. thanks for the heads up on the post. nice to know, this way someone doesn’t send out a search and rescue party looking for you cause you missed your post time. look forward to the post.
later,
zach lebar
I just want to know who posted if it wasn’t Scott?
Hey Scott,
Just read a review of TDPB 2 on TWIP which I think was way off base (and I told them so). Your books are much appreciated and I frankly enjoy your photography, too. Keep up the great work and don’t let a few morons (Kim H and that ilk) get you down.
The community gets together even without our leader. I think its great Scott posts as often as he does. Amazing how finds the time. And for those who get upset about the timing I’m sure you’ll get a refund.
But I want my Kelby NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!
It’s 12:37pm and i have yet to have my Scott Kelby forum fix of the day.. it better be a good one! I’m going through withdrawals…..
Some people just look for things to complain about.
Scott — I think you’re using the “A/P” incorrectly on your prints. I’ve never seen it stand for anything but “Artist’s Proof,” meaning that the print is outside the official numbered edition and was pulled for the artist him/herself.
If the print has a numbered edition, the number of AP prints is usually very tightly controlled, so that an edition of, say, 12 may have an additional one or two AP prints.