<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Guest Blog Wednesday Featuring: Matt Kloskowski</title>
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for personal friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ana</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-75124</link>
		<author>Ana</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-75124</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

I haven't read all your ideas for changes in Photoshop yet because as soon as I read # 2:  FIle &#62; Automate &#62; Watermark my heart started pounding with exciting...   I thought I had just found the answer to my problem: watermarking countless images at one time, in an easy fashion.  Unfortunately, I soon discovered, as I read the blog more closely, these 10 ideas were just that, ideas not realities (yet).  Wow, what a bummer. 

I have an absolute TON of images I want &#38; need to watermark, but I have not been able to figure out how to create an action and do whatever all needs to be done before going to "Automate" and "batch".  Sorry to say I'm one of those who has a hard time with understanding directions. 

IS there anywhere I can find a good quick tutorial or something on how to do this?  I like  REALLY REALLY need to figure this out so I can watermark my boat load of images.
(I have CS2).

I sure hope Adobe implements your ideas cuz I need #2 to happen.  : ) 

Thanks Matt!
PS  This is my first visit to www.Scottkelby.com and I am impressed with not only the information provided but with the heart and attitude in which it is offered.  I have Bookmarked this site and plan to visit it regularly.
Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read all your ideas for changes in Photoshop yet because as soon as I read # 2:  FIle &gt; Automate &gt; Watermark my heart started pounding with exciting&#8230;   I thought I had just found the answer to my problem: watermarking countless images at one time, in an easy fashion.  Unfortunately, I soon discovered, as I read the blog more closely, these 10 ideas were just that, ideas not realities (yet).  Wow, what a bummer. </p>
<p>I have an absolute TON of images I want &amp; need to watermark, but I have not been able to figure out how to create an action and do whatever all needs to be done before going to &#8220;Automate&#8221; and &#8220;batch&#8221;.  Sorry to say I&#8217;m one of those who has a hard time with understanding directions. </p>
<p>IS there anywhere I can find a good quick tutorial or something on how to do this?  I like  REALLY REALLY need to figure this out so I can watermark my boat load of images.<br />
(I have CS2).</p>
<p>I sure hope Adobe implements your ideas cuz I need #2 to happen.  : ) </p>
<p>Thanks Matt!<br />
PS  This is my first visit to <a href="http://www.Scottkelby.com" rel="nofollow">www.Scottkelby.com</a> and I am impressed with not only the information provided but with the heart and attitude in which it is offered.  I have Bookmarked this site and plan to visit it regularly.<br />
Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally Kanak</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-74677</link>
		<author>Wally Kanak</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-74677</guid>
		<description>Is there a preset or some other way to get my D3 to match up with Lightroom? What I see on my view screen and how the photo looks in lightroom is quite different. My camera presets do not seem to carry into lightroom.

Thank you in advance for any help you can give
Wally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a preset or some other way to get my D3 to match up with Lightroom? What I see on my view screen and how the photo looks in lightroom is quite different. My camera presets do not seem to carry into lightroom.</p>
<p>Thank you in advance for any help you can give<br />
Wally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxwhite</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-72213</link>
		<author>maxwhite</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-72213</guid>
		<description>Hey ... keep up the excellent work
Find them all great, 7b helpful
thanks so much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8230; keep up the excellent work<br />
Find them all great, 7b helpful<br />
thanks so much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-71678</link>
		<author>William Collins</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-71678</guid>
		<description>I really like the idea of the Default Setting in Layer Styles...GREAT!!!!

The Before and After views would be great also...

Thanks, Matt, for all of these possibilities....

Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the idea of the Default Setting in Layer Styles&#8230;GREAT!!!!</p>
<p>The Before and After views would be great also&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks, Matt, for all of these possibilities&#8230;.</p>
<p>Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ако можехте какво бихте променили във Photoshop? &#124; Pixelmind weBlog - графичен дизайн &#124; уеб дизайн &#124; трикове &#124; технологии &#124; креативност &#124; Photoshop и много Adobe</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-71616</link>
		<author>Ако можехте какво бихте променили във Photoshop? &#124; Pixelmind weBlog - графичен дизайн &#124; уеб дизайн &#124; трикове &#124; технологии &#124; креативност &#124; Photoshop и много Adobe</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-71616</guid>
		<description>[...] в CS4. И още няколко желани добавки за Photoshop от Matt Kloskowski.   Добави текущия постинг към някоя от изброените [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] в CS4. И още няколко желани добавки за Photoshop от Matt Kloskowski.   Добави текущия постинг към някоя от изброените [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Wenrich</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-71195</link>
		<author>Shawn Wenrich</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-71195</guid>
		<description>Wow, I'm really impressed with all the thought and work that went into this. Photoshop should pay you!

Glad I visited this blog today. I'm a Lightroom Killer Tips addict!!

Luv you Matt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;m really impressed with all the thought and work that went into this. Photoshop should pay you!</p>
<p>Glad I visited this blog today. I&#8217;m a Lightroom Killer Tips addict!!</p>
<p>Luv you Matt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ideas for the new version of Photoshop &#124; Ben's Photography Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-70570</link>
		<author>Ideas for the new version of Photoshop &#124; Ben's Photography Thoughts</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-70570</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Kloskowski Started us off here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Matt Kloskowski Started us off here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoshop Insider &#187; It's Guest Blog Wednesday Featuring: John Nack</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-70101</link>
		<author>Photoshop Insider &#187; It's Guest Blog Wednesday Featuring: John Nack</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-70101</guid>
		<description>[...] Kloskowski made a number of good suggestions, but I have to push back on two things.  One, I think translucent interface elements generally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Kloskowski made a number of good suggestions, but I have to push back on two things.  One, I think translucent interface elements generally [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Grimsley</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-68884</link>
		<author>Mary Grimsley</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-68884</guid>
		<description>Matt, I think your ideas are brilliant. These are significant and important improvements! I like all but one of the ideas you propose, and if I had good eyesight, I might also like that one. The one: the idea of changing the color of the interface to grey or black, opting for the cool interface look you can get with Lightroom. If changing the background color of an interface were added as an _option_, that would be fine, but making the interface necessarily dark would make it harder to use for those with visual handicaps and would not be a good idea in my opinion. Being able to read the print is more important than anything else.

For the same reason, I disagree with all of Scott's suggestions for making the interface more like Lightroom's in various other ways. The print is too small and hard to see in Lightroom's squashed-up way of pushing the important interactions over into that tiny area. I'm for pull-down menus and separate white large dialog boxes with large print in every case!

I'd guess that there are plenty of people who think the Lightroom-style of interface cool now who won't think so as they age and (perhaps) find their vision getting worse. In my opinion Adobe would be making a marketing mistake if they altered Photoshop in such a way that established users had important and very basic reasons not to upgrade as they grew older. As it stands now, they can pick up new users for Photoshop as Baby Boomers retire and get seriously into digital photography. That is, many Boomers will become new Adobe customers as long as they can see Adobe's interface well enough to find it pleasant to use.

The #1 "Improvement" for me would be for Adobe to offer size adjustments in more areas than just the display size of font choices. If in the general preferences they offered a way to make all the text in dialogs and everywhere else bigger, that would be great, as would making the tool icons bigger. For a number of reasons, including the lack of access to the top of the screen, Apple's visual aid thing through the system doesn't work well enough to use it for this purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I think your ideas are brilliant. These are significant and important improvements! I like all but one of the ideas you propose, and if I had good eyesight, I might also like that one. The one: the idea of changing the color of the interface to grey or black, opting for the cool interface look you can get with Lightroom. If changing the background color of an interface were added as an _option_, that would be fine, but making the interface necessarily dark would make it harder to use for those with visual handicaps and would not be a good idea in my opinion. Being able to read the print is more important than anything else.</p>
<p>For the same reason, I disagree with all of Scott&#8217;s suggestions for making the interface more like Lightroom&#8217;s in various other ways. The print is too small and hard to see in Lightroom&#8217;s squashed-up way of pushing the important interactions over into that tiny area. I&#8217;m for pull-down menus and separate white large dialog boxes with large print in every case!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d guess that there are plenty of people who think the Lightroom-style of interface cool now who won&#8217;t think so as they age and (perhaps) find their vision getting worse. In my opinion Adobe would be making a marketing mistake if they altered Photoshop in such a way that established users had important and very basic reasons not to upgrade as they grew older. As it stands now, they can pick up new users for Photoshop as Baby Boomers retire and get seriously into digital photography. That is, many Boomers will become new Adobe customers as long as they can see Adobe&#8217;s interface well enough to find it pleasant to use.</p>
<p>The #1 &#8220;Improvement&#8221; for me would be for Adobe to offer size adjustments in more areas than just the display size of font choices. If in the general preferences they offered a way to make all the text in dialogs and everywhere else bigger, that would be great, as would making the tool icons bigger. For a number of reasons, including the lack of access to the top of the screen, Apple&#8217;s visual aid thing through the system doesn&#8217;t work well enough to use it for this purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Roundup 06-28-2008</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-68849</link>
		<author>Link Roundup 06-28-2008</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-68849</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Kloskowski Shares His Wishlist for Photoshop Features Photoshop Insider Matt does an awesome job at laying out some useful features that Photoshop could possibly have in the future. He even goes so far as to mock up the dialogs and layouts of the tools he&#8217;s dreamed up. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Matt Kloskowski Shares His Wishlist for Photoshop Features Photoshop Insider Matt does an awesome job at laying out some useful features that Photoshop could possibly have in the future. He even goes so far as to mock up the dialogs and layouts of the tools he&#8217;s dreamed up. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mardi Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-68571</link>
		<author>Mardi Carter</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-68571</guid>
		<description>I'm not so sure I like the idea of the black interface.  Some of us with age challenged eyesight might have trouble with it.  How about an option to choose - like there is for the Bridge background?  Love the idea of dialog box transparency.

The blend mode palette with thumbnails is an awesome idea.  That's my favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure I like the idea of the black interface.  Some of us with age challenged eyesight might have trouble with it.  How about an option to choose - like there is for the Bridge background?  Love the idea of dialog box transparency.</p>
<p>The blend mode palette with thumbnails is an awesome idea.  That&#8217;s my favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links - June 27, 2008 &#171; Photo Notes: Photography by Patty Hankins and Bill Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-68497</link>
		<author>Links - June 27, 2008 &#171; Photo Notes: Photography by Patty Hankins and Bill Lawrence</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1544#comment-68497</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Kloskowski has a guest post on Photoshop Insider on Photoshop Dialogs and Palettes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Matt Kloskowski has a guest post on Photoshop Insider on Photoshop Dialogs and Palettes [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
