<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catch My Exclusive Interview with Attorney Ed Greenberg for the Straight Scoop on Copyright, Model Releases, and Shooting in Public</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Copyright for Photographers &#124; Where Art &#38; Engineering Collide</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-2#comment-107883</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyright for Photographers &#124; Where Art &#38; Engineering Collide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-107883</guid>
		<description>[...] The video will be in the next Photoshop User TV episode. You can see his post and see the videos here.     2 Comments, Comment or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The video will be in the next Photoshop User TV episode. You can see his post and see the videos here.     2 Comments, Comment or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Model VS photographer in ownership of legal rights/copy-rights - PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-2#comment-83442</link>
		<dc:creator>Model VS photographer in ownership of legal rights/copy-rights - PhotoCamel - Your Friendly Photo Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-83442</guid>
		<description>[...] Again, this is mostly for US based photographers as the law does differ country to country.  Photoshop Insider » Catch My Exclusive Interview with Attorney Ed Greenberg for the Straight Scoop o...  __________________          __________________ Members don't see this ad. Register your free [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Again, this is mostly for US based photographers as the law does differ country to country.  Photoshop Insider » Catch My Exclusive Interview with Attorney Ed Greenberg for the Straight Scoop o&#8230;  __________________          __________________ Members don&#8217;t see this ad. Register your free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed greenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-2#comment-79540</link>
		<dc:creator>ed greenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-79540</guid>
		<description>Dear Zak:  You misunderstood my mantra.  Register all of your work on an on going basis all of the time.  Don't wait for anything other than the image to materialize digitally or if film, when it is processed.  Do not wait to register until infringement(s).  Do not wait for anything except the completion of the picture taking process PERIOD. All of your work is to be registered.  Do not pick and choose.  You never know when an image may become valuable. due to the transformation of time or events.

Dear Dan:  Advice such as yours drives more paying customers to attorneys' offices than you can imagine.  I have read and disagree with almost everything you have written on the subject.  I am unaware of any legal expertise nor what other expertise you bring to the discussion.  Photographers are no more qualified to give legal advice than attorneys are to suggest f stops.  Finally, I have yet to read the comments or opinions of any other attorney or law professor who concurs with the unsupported legal opinions and advice you offer in your book or blog.  50% of the lecture Jack and I will be giving in Las Vegas for Photoshop on the subject of model releases is dedicated to correcting myths and the process of separating the "Bull from the Beef" when it comes to releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Zak:  You misunderstood my mantra.  Register all of your work on an on going basis all of the time.  Don&#8217;t wait for anything other than the image to materialize digitally or if film, when it is processed.  Do not wait to register until infringement(s).  Do not wait for anything except the completion of the picture taking process PERIOD. All of your work is to be registered.  Do not pick and choose.  You never know when an image may become valuable. due to the transformation of time or events.</p>
<p>Dear Dan:  Advice such as yours drives more paying customers to attorneys&#8217; offices than you can imagine.  I have read and disagree with almost everything you have written on the subject.  I am unaware of any legal expertise nor what other expertise you bring to the discussion.  Photographers are no more qualified to give legal advice than attorneys are to suggest f stops.  Finally, I have yet to read the comments or opinions of any other attorney or law professor who concurs with the unsupported legal opinions and advice you offer in your book or blog.  50% of the lecture Jack and I will be giving in Las Vegas for Photoshop on the subject of model releases is dedicated to correcting myths and the process of separating the &#8220;Bull from the Beef&#8221; when it comes to releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Picsdallas</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-2#comment-78489</link>
		<dc:creator>Picsdallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-78489</guid>
		<description>Well I clicked again and they played.  Very good information.

Thank You
PicsDallas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I clicked again and they played.  Very good information.</p>
<p>Thank You<br />
PicsDallas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Picsdallas</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-2#comment-78486</link>
		<dc:creator>Picsdallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-78486</guid>
		<description>Sad, on this date 8/3 the videos are not available.  Will they return in the future ?

PD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad, on this date 8/3 the videos are not available.  Will they return in the future ?</p>
<p>PD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Wold</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-2#comment-75698</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Wold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-75698</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for these videos. Very clear and quite helpful! I've read up so much on this subject(and sometimes asked other photographers, lol!), but always end up getting confused when it comes to published vs unpublished part. The answer I've gotten ranges from anything that's been publicly posted is published(which would include flickr, blogs, etc), to if you've submitted them for sales (such as to a stock agency or a magazine) then they are published. So to be safe I should consider it all published if it's ever been publicly visible?

How do people include this in their workflow? Do you submit to the copyright office every time you click the shutter? Or use the 90 day rule and submit everything you published in the last 90 days? Or only submit every so often, but refrain from publishing(such as to your blog) until you've submitted for copyright? 

I absolutely loved your 7 Point System - it totally changed the way I did editing(I didn't even know where to start before).  Now I need a 7 point system for registering copyright! :-)  Just kidding, but it would be very interesting to know how you include this in your workflow.

Thanks again for a great blog, I always look forward to reading it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for these videos. Very clear and quite helpful! I&#8217;ve read up so much on this subject(and sometimes asked other photographers, lol!), but always end up getting confused when it comes to published vs unpublished part. The answer I&#8217;ve gotten ranges from anything that&#8217;s been publicly posted is published(which would include flickr, blogs, etc), to if you&#8217;ve submitted them for sales (such as to a stock agency or a magazine) then they are published. So to be safe I should consider it all published if it&#8217;s ever been publicly visible?</p>
<p>How do people include this in their workflow? Do you submit to the copyright office every time you click the shutter? Or use the 90 day rule and submit everything you published in the last 90 days? Or only submit every so often, but refrain from publishing(such as to your blog) until you&#8217;ve submitted for copyright? </p>
<p>I absolutely loved your 7 Point System - it totally changed the way I did editing(I didn&#8217;t even know where to start before).  Now I need a 7 point system for registering copyright! <img src='http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Just kidding, but it would be very interesting to know how you include this in your workflow.</p>
<p>Thanks again for a great blog, I always look forward to reading it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: around the net, volume 14: copyright, links, movies about photographers and a photo a day &#124; pro photo life</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-2#comment-74739</link>
		<dc:creator>around the net, volume 14: copyright, links, movies about photographers and a photo a day &#124; pro photo life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-74739</guid>
		<description>[...] videos on Photoshop Insider: Scott Kelbyâ€™s exclusive interview with Attorney Ed Greenberg on copyright, model releases and shooting in public. Many of the questions posed by prophotolife readers regarding legal issues (can I photograph that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] videos on Photoshop Insider: Scott Kelbyâ€™s exclusive interview with Attorney Ed Greenberg on copyright, model releases and shooting in public. Many of the questions posed by prophotolife readers regarding legal issues (can I photograph that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Talkington</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-2#comment-74708</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Talkington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-74708</guid>
		<description>Wonderful interviews and a great service to photographers, thanks for these videos. Though I felt familiar with much of what Mr. Greenberg had to say it's great to hear the message repeated from such a respected authority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful interviews and a great service to photographers, thanks for these videos. Though I felt familiar with much of what Mr. Greenberg had to say it&#8217;s great to hear the message repeated from such a respected authority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-2#comment-74074</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-74074</guid>
		<description>As an addendum, it would be very beneficial to publish the interview in print here also. Unfortunately for some, due to location limitations, dialup is an only option. Those without high speed connections dont always have the time or advantage of being able to devote sometimes hours to gain the necessary information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an addendum, it would be very beneficial to publish the interview in print here also. Unfortunately for some, due to location limitations, dialup is an only option. Those without high speed connections dont always have the time or advantage of being able to devote sometimes hours to gain the necessary information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Scoop on Copyright, Model Releases and Shooting in Public &#171; ChromaticSoul &#124; The Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-2#comment-73047</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scoop on Copyright, Model Releases and Shooting in Public &#171; ChromaticSoul &#124; The Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-73047</guid>
		<description>[...] Fortunately for us, Scott had recorded these interviews and made them available via his blog, The Photoshop Insider. This is a must read for all photographers (business or pleasure). It&#8217;s a two-part series so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fortunately for us, Scott had recorded these interviews and made them available via his blog, The Photoshop Insider. This is a must read for all photographers (business or pleasure). It&#8217;s a two-part series so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trina Knudsen</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-1#comment-73042</link>
		<dc:creator>Trina Knudsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-73042</guid>
		<description>So how does the intellectual property laws apply to wedding photography and "guests" of  the wedding. The guests did not sign the contract, but images are used on Web sites and blogs for self promotion.  Are these images subject to the same criteria as shooting a person on the street?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how does the intellectual property laws apply to wedding photography and &#8220;guests&#8221; of  the wedding. The guests did not sign the contract, but images are used on Web sites and blogs for self promotion.  Are these images subject to the same criteria as shooting a person on the street?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photographer&#8217;s Rights &#124; recycledpapyr.us</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645/comment-page-1#comment-72877</link>
		<dc:creator>Photographer&#8217;s Rights &#124; recycledpapyr.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1645#comment-72877</guid>
		<description>[...] just recently had an interview with Ed Greenberg, an expert in this subject, on an episode of Photoshop User TV.&#160; Check it out - it is very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just recently had an interview with Ed Greenberg, an expert in this subject, on an episode of Photoshop User TV.&nbsp; Check it out - it is very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
