<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive Interview on Copyright  for Photographers with Jack Reznicki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: url submission</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-78112</link>
		<dc:creator>url submission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-78112</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;url submission...&lt;/strong&gt;

One notable blogging tool that does not support trackback yet is Blogger.) Some individuals or companies have abused the TrackBack...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>url submission&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>One notable blogging tool that does not support trackback yet is Blogger.) Some individuals or companies have abused the TrackBack&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-75074</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-75074</guid>
		<description>It was gophotography.net.    You can find it here:  http://www.gophotography.net/tips/copyright.html

Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was gophotography.net.    You can find it here:  <a href="http://www.gophotography.net/tips/copyright.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gophotography.net/tips/copyright.html</a></p>
<p>Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-74795</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-74795</guid>
		<description>Ooops, my bad.  I downloaded one Wed. night thinking it was from that site.  You can get one here: http://www.smithsholar.com/pdf/copyright_forms/formvas.pdf .  I don't think that's where I got mine and I will find the original site and post it but, for now, this one works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, my bad.  I downloaded one Wed. night thinking it was from that site.  You can get one here: <a href="http://www.smithsholar.com/pdf/copyright_forms/formvas.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.smithsholar.com/pdf/copyright_forms/formvas.pdf</a> .  I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s where I got mine and I will find the original site and post it but, for now, this one works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links - July 18 2008 &#171; Photo Notes: Photography by Patty Hankins and Bill Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-74782</link>
		<dc:creator>Links - July 18 2008 &#171; Photo Notes: Photography by Patty Hankins and Bill Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-74782</guid>
		<description>[...] PhotoshopInsider has a fantastic interview with Jack Reznicki about Copyright Registration [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PhotoshopInsider has a fantastic interview with Jack Reznicki about Copyright Registration [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Vautrinot</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-74680</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Vautrinot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-74680</guid>
		<description>Sorry Dennis, clicking on the appropriate form only re-directs you to the Copyright Office only to be told the forms are no longer available.

Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Dennis, clicking on the appropriate form only re-directs you to the Copyright Office only to be told the forms are no longer available.</p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-74581</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-74581</guid>
		<description>The Copyright office doesn't list their forms for download but you can get them from this site: http://www.bitlaw.com/forms/crforms.html.

Considering it costs $45 to file a copyright form for what could be thousands of files, what would be a practical time to file, quarterly??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Copyright office doesn&#8217;t list their forms for download but you can get them from this site: <a href="http://www.bitlaw.com/forms/crforms.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bitlaw.com/forms/crforms.html</a>.</p>
<p>Considering it costs $45 to file a copyright form for what could be thousands of files, what would be a practical time to file, quarterly??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-74464</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-74464</guid>
		<description>Good news for any Irish readers of this site:

"copyright arises automatically on the creation of an original work. You do not need to publish your work, to put a copyright notice on it or do anything else to be covered by copyright - protection is free and automatic"
- Irish Copyright Licensing Agency</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for any Irish readers of this site:</p>
<p>&#8220;copyright arises automatically on the creation of an original work. You do not need to publish your work, to put a copyright notice on it or do anything else to be covered by copyright - protection is free and automatic&#8221;<br />
- Irish Copyright Licensing Agency</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Lippman</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-74343</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Lippman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-74343</guid>
		<description>Thanks for another information posting.

As a followup to a question posted above. It would be great to have some suggestions as to "workflow" for copyrighting images. For instance, should you burn a CD copy of your images right after uploading from a shoot and copyright all of the imported images (or perhaps all images after the first scan to discard the outtakes)? Or should you wait until images have all been post-processed and thus copyright the final versions? Does each snapshot or virtual image need to be copyrighted, or would a processed version be considered derivative of the original and therefore covered by a copyright on the original? How much postprocessing can you do before the image becomes a new image and needs separate copyright registration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for another information posting.</p>
<p>As a followup to a question posted above. It would be great to have some suggestions as to &#8220;workflow&#8221; for copyrighting images. For instance, should you burn a CD copy of your images right after uploading from a shoot and copyright all of the imported images (or perhaps all images after the first scan to discard the outtakes)? Or should you wait until images have all been post-processed and thus copyright the final versions? Does each snapshot or virtual image need to be copyrighted, or would a processed version be considered derivative of the original and therefore covered by a copyright on the original? How much postprocessing can you do before the image becomes a new image and needs separate copyright registration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-74322</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-74322</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jacques!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jacques!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wednesday News &#124; Bernskiold Media</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-74293</link>
		<dc:creator>Wednesday News &#124; Bernskiold Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-74293</guid>
		<description>[...] up the major concerns a photographer and graphics designer might have. Scott has the interview clip on his blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up the major concerns a photographer and graphics designer might have. Scott has the interview clip on his blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-74223</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-74223</guid>
		<description>Also see http://www.photopermit.org/ for a place to find the PDF file of the new laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also see <a href="http://www.photopermit.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.photopermit.org/</a> for a place to find the PDF file of the new laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665/comment-page-1#comment-74222</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1665#comment-74222</guid>
		<description>Something I found on the 
http://www.photoattorney.com/
blog.
http://www.photoattorney.com/

Jul 15, 2008
I Love New York! Photo Permit Rules Improved! 
The New York City's Mayor's Office of Film, Theater and Broadcasting 
has revised its rules on public photography. No permit is required 
for still photographers with handheld camera and tripod unless you 
want exclusive use of City property. Background information on my 
July 4, 2007, blog. Great update report by Daryl Lang at PDN. Hooray!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I found on the<br />
<a href="http://www.photoattorney.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoattorney.com/</a><br />
blog.<br />
<a href="http://www.photoattorney.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoattorney.com/</a></p>
<p>Jul 15, 2008<br />
I Love New York! Photo Permit Rules Improved!<br />
The New York City&#8217;s Mayor&#8217;s Office of Film, Theater and Broadcasting<br />
has revised its rules on public photography. No permit is required<br />
for still photographers with handheld camera and tripod unless you<br />
want exclusive use of City property. Background information on my<br />
July 4, 2007, blog. Great update report by Daryl Lang at PDN. Hooray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
