<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jack and Ed Answer More of Your &#8216;Copyright for Photographers&#8217; Questions</title>
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for personal friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Theo</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-78393</link>
		<author>Theo</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 05:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-78393</guid>
		<description>ok when you submit your pictures on-line in a zip. Do you include the txt list of the files in the zip or seperate. I don't want to have to copy 1000 file names to a form. 

Thanks
Theo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok when you submit your pictures on-line in a zip. Do you include the txt list of the files in the zip or seperate. I don&#8217;t want to have to copy 1000 file names to a form. </p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Theo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Model Releases &#124; PixelatedImage Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-76887</link>
		<author>Model Releases &#124; PixelatedImage Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-76887</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s some good discussion about all this going on these days over at Scott Kelby&#8217;s blog, and the input is coming from experts, not just other photographers with opinions. Start HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There&#8217;s some good discussion about all this going on these days over at Scott Kelby&#8217;s blog, and the input is coming from experts, not just other photographers with opinions. Start HERE. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus Mq</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75508</link>
		<author>Gus Mq</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75508</guid>
		<description>Timothy Matthews,

The copyright duration used to be life + 50 years. The term extension act of 1998 made it the current length of life + 70 years .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy Matthews,</p>
<p>The copyright duration used to be life + 50 years. The term extension act of 1998 made it the current length of life + 70 years .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason D. Moore Photography &#187; Blog Archive &#187; P&#38;P Weekly: #86</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75342</link>
		<author>Jason D. Moore Photography &#187; Blog Archive &#187; P&#38;P Weekly: #86</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75342</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott of Photoshop Insider - &#8220;Copyright for Photographers&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Scott of Photoshop Insider - &#8220;Copyright for Photographers&#8220; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas R. Von Staden</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75229</link>
		<author>Nicholas R. Von Staden</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75229</guid>
		<description>FYI a local south florida photographer just won a BIG copyright infrige case, .a judgment anyhow ....$12 Million!!!!.. here's the link at a good site :http://www.photoattorney.com/2008/06/photographer-gets-12-million-verdict.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI a local south florida photographer just won a BIG copyright infrige case, .a judgment anyhow &#8230;.$12 Million!!!!.. here&#8217;s the link at a good site :http://www.photoattorney.com/2008/06/photographer-gets-12-million-verdict.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75212</link>
		<author>david</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75212</guid>
		<description>No to be rude or anything....but what happened to the photography and photoshop related postings on scott kelby's blog. Seems like all everyone talks about is how to copyright...for the last month. Can we get back to the fun of photoshop again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No to be rude or anything&#8230;.but what happened to the photography and photoshop related postings on scott kelby&#8217;s blog. Seems like all everyone talks about is how to copyright&#8230;for the last month. Can we get back to the fun of photoshop again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Casciano</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75101</link>
		<author>Chris Casciano</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75101</guid>
		<description>I had hear briefly mentioned in other forums about the possibility of registering a web site / blog / flickr site as an ongoing publication of sorts and thus get any future 'published' photos covered without explicitly registering the individual work.

I realize this only covers a small portion of photographer's work, but I was wondering if the experts might elaborate on this method of registration [or shoot it down as a possibility].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had hear briefly mentioned in other forums about the possibility of registering a web site / blog / flickr site as an ongoing publication of sorts and thus get any future &#8216;published&#8217; photos covered without explicitly registering the individual work.</p>
<p>I realize this only covers a small portion of photographer&#8217;s work, but I was wondering if the experts might elaborate on this method of registration [or shoot it down as a possibility].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob McNamara</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75044</link>
		<author>Bob McNamara</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-75044</guid>
		<description>Scott,
Just finished your 7-Points book.  Went through the whole thing in about three days.  It was fantastic.  There is one thing it lacked though (who am I to talk...I'm just a newby to this) that is using Photoshop with black and white photos.  Are there any projects on the burner dealing with this?  Perhaps you could refer me to a resident expert.  
Thanks 
bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
Just finished your 7-Points book.  Went through the whole thing in about three days.  It was fantastic.  There is one thing it lacked though (who am I to talk&#8230;I&#8217;m just a newby to this) that is using Photoshop with black and white photos.  Are there any projects on the burner dealing with this?  Perhaps you could refer me to a resident expert.<br />
Thanks<br />
bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Mathews</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-74943</link>
		<author>Timothy Mathews</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-74943</guid>
		<description>By the way. As I'm submitting this it's my birthday too, ya. Really it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way. As I&#8217;m submitting this it&#8217;s my birthday too, ya. Really it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Mathews</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-74942</link>
		<author>Timothy Mathews</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-74942</guid>
		<description>I use a freeware program for windows called DirToTxt to turn directory listings into printable text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a freeware program for windows called DirToTxt to turn directory listings into printable text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Mathews</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-74939</link>
		<author>Timothy Mathews</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-74939</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great info about how to copyright ones photos. Last week your guest said $45 a month, I was relieved to find out I could register all my photos for a one time fee of $45. Happy Birthday, I know I'm a week late. BTW not only is the Beetles "you say it's your birthday" copyrighted, so is "Happy Birthday," much to the bane of many a filmmaker. I was confused though when Jack Rezneki said life plus 70 years? So Disney gets an extra 20 years? The Disney copyright act kept Mickey Mouse copyrighted by changing the law from life plus 70 years to life plus 90 years. 
Of greater concern is the Orphan works act which looks like it may through a spanner in the works.
Here is a link to the current version of this bill that will mean that the library of congress database isn't enough. Well you can draw your own conclusions and follow it and maybe mention it on your show when we know more.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2913

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5889

Again, Happy Birthday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great info about how to copyright ones photos. Last week your guest said $45 a month, I was relieved to find out I could register all my photos for a one time fee of $45. Happy Birthday, I know I&#8217;m a week late. BTW not only is the Beetles &#8220;you say it&#8217;s your birthday&#8221; copyrighted, so is &#8220;Happy Birthday,&#8221; much to the bane of many a filmmaker. I was confused though when Jack Rezneki said life plus 70 years? So Disney gets an extra 20 years? The Disney copyright act kept Mickey Mouse copyrighted by changing the law from life plus 70 years to life plus 90 years.<br />
Of greater concern is the Orphan works act which looks like it may through a spanner in the works.<br />
Here is a link to the current version of this bill that will mean that the library of congress database isn&#8217;t enough. Well you can draw your own conclusions and follow it and maybe mention it on your show when we know more.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2913" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2913</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5889" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5889</a></p>
<p>Again, Happy Birthday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-74934</link>
		<author>Matthew Ingram</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1680#comment-74934</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott, this is a bit off topic; however, being a big fan of yours at a young age I have been using print services from MPIX. I recently purchased a photo (dimensions 16" x 24") from them. However at the time I didn't realize that very few frames are made for this size print. Do you have any suggestions as to a website or store I could find a frame this size. Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott, this is a bit off topic; however, being a big fan of yours at a young age I have been using print services from MPIX. I recently purchased a photo (dimensions 16&#8243; x 24&#8243;) from them. However at the time I didn&#8217;t realize that very few frames are made for this size print. Do you have any suggestions as to a website or store I could find a frame this size. Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
