Thursday News Stuff
It’s Thursday, and that’s means it’s time for “news stuffage!”
First, thanks to my buddy Terry White for yesterday’s guest blog post which garnered lots of love from my readers. Had I known the interest in Lightroom to iPhoto uploading was as big as it was, I would’ve written a book on it by now (totally kidding).
Here’s what up:
- This week we had Adobe Photoshop Product Manager Bryan Hughes as an in-studio guest on Photoshop User TV, and we talked with Bryan about the advantages of converting your files to DNG vs. just working with the Raw image files. Very interest stuffing (here’s the link to watch it online).
- USA Today ran an article yesterday called “Attention to lighting can make a huge difference in your photos“ and in the article they asked me for five tips about light and shooting outdoors this summer. They ran an example photo from my book “The Digital Photography Book, Vol. 1″ and if you read the comments posted in the online version of the article, people think the photo was “faked.” (Actually, they’re sure of it). The funny thing is; it’s SO not. I asked the model (who was there as part of a photo workshop), to stand in the harsh direct 2:00 pm bright sunlight, and I took the first shot. Then I asked her to move over into the shade of a large tree, about 25 or 30 feet away, and as soon as she got in place, I took the 2nd shot. The whole thing took all of 30-seconds (if that). She didn’t put on makeup (as some allege) or redo her hair (they’re sure she did)—she just walked into the shade and I took the shot. The only reason these folks think it was faked is; they haven’t tried it themselves. Once they do; they’ll be amazed. Anyway, you can read the article right here.
- I did an interview on TechTalk Radio about the upcoming Photoshop World, which aired on Sunday, but you can still listen to the interview right here.
- Here’s a workshop I’d love to take: it’s an on-location full-day architectural/interior photography workshop (held just outside Los Angeles in Santa Clarita, California), on how to light home or business interiors using off camera flash (like a Nikon SB-800 or a Canon 580 EX). The instructors are interior photographers Scott Hargis and Thomas Grubba and the full-day workshop is coming up on Saturday, August 2nd (the tuition is only $275). For full details, click here.
- Reminder: there’s only eight days left to take advantage of the Photoshop World $100-off Early Bird registration. Here’s the link for info, and to sign up.
- Lastly, Alan Hess pointed out this site called “Keep Your Copyrights” which was created by the Columbia University Law School. Here’s that link (Thanks Alan!).
Hope you all have a really fantastic Thursday! Here’s a way to guarantee it: If you want to do something that will really make you feel great, make a donation to Springs of Hope Kenya. They are building a small clinic and orphanage in Kenya. Here’s the link to where you can make a donation or sponsor a child. (I know the local family behind this project personally, and your donations go directly to help people who need it very badly). It’ll make you feel like you did something really important today (and believe me, you will have).












Just bounced over to USA today to read the article and the comments. I wonder if some of them do anything other than professionally comment on blogs or if they’ve ever held a camera.
It is funny how everyone knows better than the expert on the USA today posts. There are so many misconceptions out there that make sure people’s pictures turn out bad. In comparison it makes our pictures look better:)
I use a shade location myself, but the model’s hair style looks different in the two pictures - I can see why people would think trickery.
hey Scott,
I just read the Article - and the comments. Seems like everyone and their Grand mamma is a certified critic - ha ha
Err, she took off her sunglasses. So obviously scott faked this with a huge studio setup which probably requires an RV to cart around, Then he photoshopped it to death.
Its impossible for an artist like Scott to just tell the model to walk under the shade and take off her glasses. No he will setup 52 different light sources and restyle the model, massage her, send her for liposuction and then take his second better shot
After 15 hours of Photoshop editing he then produces his masterpiece
Of course this does mean Scott can do a follow-up article with USA Today which is sort of a comment rebuttal/sales pitch which says
The reason the model’s eyes were closed was to illustrate the point of this is what happens when you shoot outdoors without paying attention to lighting (i.e. she didn’t want her retinas burnt out, so her eyes were screwed up)
Part B of the article pushes his much loved and worn 7 step book which shows what a true digital expert can do with a before/after image and shuts up the muppets commenting on USA Today, while hopefully selling more of his books and giving the USA Today staff another feature.
“muppets” - now that is art Phil! I don’t know how much thought you put into that, but it is perhaps the most apt description one might have used - reminds me of the complaining old crumugeons who used to sit in the audience and critique.
The comments do point out an interesting trend towards suspicion - it is pretty funny when you think about it. It is not as though Scott was selling something. Granted, people may take his advice and then buy his book looking for more of the same, but he is in that position likely because USA Today recognizes his skill in making the difficult seem easy.
Their loss if they don’t take his free advice!
Thanks, Scott, for your simplifying ways, and for your support of the work in Kenya - it is difficult for those who have never been out of the US to imagine the need in places like East Africa.
I know what you mean about that harsh sunlight Scott. Makes a bigg difference.
What us pro’s are always looking for is tips on making them look good in harsh sunlight. Not because we like it, but because sometimes we have no choice. I’ve made a few presets that RQ sunlight shots a bit, and help out, but I’m still looking for the magic bullet.
Gavin
SeimEffects.com
ProPhotoShow.net
Scott
I know what a font lover you are, you have to see this video.
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1823766
Scott,
Great lighting tips as always. I can see why it threw some people; when you look at the enlarged versions, the hair/sunglasses difference is obvious.
It’s funny though, when people have an “opinion” they will stick with it no matter how much concrete evidence there is to the contrary.
If we actually follow the pros advice our pictures will get dramatically better. I am always amazed when I learn a new tip and how much better my photos look. Unfortunately many people use their camera like someone trying to install those tiny screws on their glasses with a butter knife.
Hey Scott - Just thought I would post this link highlighting the situation in East Africa.
http://defendfaithandfamily.blogspot.com/
Here’s a random image I came across that I think is amusing so I had to share. It’s a true cameraphone!
http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/07/a-true-cameraphone/#more-11862
Wow! Tough crowd over at the USA Today website! What was up with the taking the cap off of the toothpaste crack! The obvious in photography isn’t so obvious to everyone.
Any hoot, you may want to get in touch with USA Today and have them post a correction, lest people think you don’t know your light sources from your lithographs. In the White Balance tip when they ask “Ever notice how a picture taken under fluorescent lights has a background that seems very yellow or orange?” They either need to change it to Tungsten lights or need to change it to seems very green….
Hey Scott,
In case you don’t know: The new Drobo is out. Improved USB 2.0 and FireWire 800 (finally!).
Peace,
MK
Scott,
If you really do read all of your blog posts you’ll be very interested where you (and the rest of the photoshop guys) have landed yourselves. I guess if you spend your life with photoshop a “disaster” or two are bound to come at some point.
http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2008/05/photoshop-world-photoshop-user-tv.html
I think the problem with the USA Today article and the comments on it is the caption of the picture. The caption says
“Examples from Scott Kelby’s book show a photo shot in the sun with harsh shadows, left, and one shot using a flash.”
That caption sort of implies the model was in the same spot (out in the sun), and the only difference was using a flash on the second one.
I read this before reading what you said you actually did, and looked at the pictures, and I was with the skeptics; you couldn’t have achieved exactly this effect if the model was in the same spot (out in the sun) and you used flash. Could have reduced contrast on her face, but there would be no way to brighten up the bushes behind her without lighting them separately.
Then I came back and read your post here, where you said she was in the shade for the second shot, and you used flash, and it all became clear how the shot came together.
Anyway - perhaps a possible explanation for the skeptical comments on the USAT article.
Scott,
I did my first real estate shoot for an agent. Not the best first time, but the guy you spoke about Scott Hargis, has been very helpful on the Flickr group as a member. Great Guy.
This mini horse farm (10 acres) home has 5+ thousand sq ft , horse barn listed at 1.9 mil….So sell you gear and buy this place, lol. They own the horse that won the Arkansas Derby, Horse not included in sale(LOL) but my photo of the filly is. I hope you will think about doing some blogs and Kelby training (which I belong and love it) on real estate photography. I sort of fell into it. Did another shoot today. Tell McNally to buy this farm with all the moo la he is making off those books.
Ken from KY
This the link I built in lightroom. I sent this to the agent for proofing.
http://www.kblawson.com/horsefarm/index.html
It seems the reason there is so much controversy in the USA Today post is that the caption under the photos is incorrect. It says one was taken in the sun and the other with flash (instead of In the shade as it was). That happens with newspapers —a lot of controversy abut incorrect information.
Washington Post article from Thursday on photographers being stopped from taking pictures in Union Station. At least Congresswoman Norton convened a hearing on the issue.
So you can’t take pictures in a public building in DC but now you can carry a handgun. Feel safer?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/22/AR2008072202671.html