As Photographers, Are We Backing Up Too Much?

I was talking with my buddy Terry White earlier this week about my photo storage problems. It seems that no matter how much extra drive space I add, before long I’m out of space again. He’s got the same problem. Maybe worse.
Part of the problem is our files are just too darn big; now even entry-level DSLRs are 12 megapixels, and a Canon 50D is up to 15 megapixels. If you shoot in raw, after five or six clicks you’ve eaten up nearly 100MB, and if you’re shooting a wedding or event, you can eat up 10 or 12GB fairly easily. If you have a 500GB hard drive for backing up your photos, and you only shoot one wedding a week, it’ll start getting kinda full in around 8 or so months.
What got me to thinkin’
In a moment, I’m going to go over my backup strategy, but before we even get there, I honestly think I might be backing up too much. Here’s what made me start thinking like that. Terry recently did a portrait shoot where he took 710 photos during the shoot. His subject reviewed the images in Lightroom, and choose the shots she liked (around 70 initially, then she narrowed it down to her favorite 5 or 6). Then Terry picked his favorites, and he chose 5 or 6.
So, what do we all do next? That’s right, we back up all 710 photos, even though the subject has already said, “I only like these 70.” She looked at them all, told the photographer straight up, “I don’t want any of the other 640 images” but we back them all up anyway. Now, Terry asked me, “What are the chances that she is going to come back some time in the future and ask for one of the ones she didn’t like? Right. Slim to none. Yet, we still store ‘em, and watch them eat up our drive space, and add more complexity to our file management. Like Terry says, “Those 640 images are never going to see the light of day. I don’t have any use for them. She doesn’t have any use for them, but I’m backing ‘em up anyway. Why?”
Client Work Backups
Now, Terry can make a good case for not backing up all 710 shots, but if you’re doing work for a client, there will be cases where you’ll need to back up every single shot. Same thing with Weddings. You never know when two years later the couple might back to you and ask for another album for a relative, but this time it has to include photos of Uncle Ralph, who wasn’t in their original album.
In cases like these, I would build in the cost of archiving those photos, and pass it on to the client. Just buy a small portable hard drive, put all the files on it, put a label on the drive, wrap it in bubble wrap and put it on the shelf. A 20GB portable LaCie hard drive runs about $49.
But then Terry brought up a good point—how often do you really need 20GB for one client (or for one wedding)? He pointed me to an 8GB USB Flash drive, for only $29. If you only need 4GB of storage, you can get one for just $13.95. Heck, you might as well get two, and have two back-ups that hardly take any space at all. You could put them in a tiny zip-lock bag and staple them to your copy of the contract for the shoot. This changes the whole situation pretty dramatically; now its not eating up your main storage; you’re off-loading the finished job to USB drive (or external hard drive) dedicated to that shoot (and paid for by the client).
Family Photos
This is one area where I always back-up every single photo, because years later the perfect shot won’t matter, because since it’s family, I’ll want to see even the bad ones, but that’s really what this post is all about; choosing what we really need to back up for our type of work, and making smart decisions about managing our storage space and our image library.
My Backup Strategy
This is going to freak some photographers out, especially those who used to shoot film (like me), and who are used to saving every single shot, no matter what. Here’s what I do:
- I import one set of photos from my camera’s memory card, onto my computer
- I automatically back-up the same set (during import into Lightroom), onto my Drobo backup system
- I edit the photos on my computer in Lightroom, deleting all the really bad shots (out of focus, totally unusable, misfires, accidental shots, etc.), and I add keywords, metadata, etc. and then edit and finish the files in Lightroom and Photoshop.
- So far, so good, but after I’m done editing, deleting, keywording, etc. I then drag that folder from computer over to the Drobo, and replace the original back-up with this final edited set. (Yikes!).
Now, why that last controversial move? It’s because if I don’t do this, and one day I need to go back and use the backed up images on my Drobo, all the bad shots will still be there; none of the keywords will be there, none of the metadata I added will be in those files, and all my edits and finishing will be gone. All that work is gone forever, so although I have the original files back, I have to start all over from scratch. I know this flies in the face of what we’ve all done since the film days, but like I said; it’s my backup strategy; it doesn’t have to be yours.
The Bottomline
What I hope will come from this post is one thing; that you’ll give some thought to how much we’re all backing up, and ask yourself if you’re backing up too much, or if you’re just backing up too much to your main backup drive. Could you be off-loading some of these shoots to small portable drives, or better (and more stable) yet, to inexpensive USB Flash drives. There will still be plenty of instances where we do need to back up each and every file, but just give some thought to the idea of just keeping “the keepers.”



















I back up A LOT, but you’ve got me thinking…
I make a new LR catalog for every session. It makes things really easy because all the image are placed inside the catalog folder and it’s totally mobile. I can move it all to another drive and it’s all there, LR settings and all.
I have my main drives, then I buy RAW SATA drives to archive/offsite to. You can get 1TB of archive for around 130 bucks now. As space fills up I can simply dump the entire customer folder (catalog and all) onto the archive drive, and when it’s fill file it away (ie 2007 weddings)
That said my storage will increase with the 5D MK2, and you got me thinking that since I have all these separate catalogs I could just to back a couple months after (I don’t really like deleting while a job is active) and just deletes all but the main shots since if I ever need to go back to that job the customer will only want the good shots anyways.
Backup is good, and most photogs need more of it now less. That said your probably right about us over archiving useless images. I may start culling older jobs.
Gavin
seimeffects.com
Wow lots of typo’s in my above comment. I have a bad habit of thinking (and writing) at a fast pace, once I get going. Sorry
Scott,
I use 4GB Lexars. On import to LR2, I also copy to a subdir of c:\Burn-to-DVD. After the day’s shoot is all imported, I burn the DVDs while reviewing pics and flagging as keep or kill. Once both tasks are done, I delete the burn subdirs and the kills and backup the keeps to an external drive.
WIth DVDs so cheap, this gives me a permanent record of every shutter-press (even tho I’ll probably never look at them) and a manageable file storage system.
Steve
PS Adding thanks for the spiral-at-staples idea.
scott,
the explosion of files is indeed a serious issue and i am glad you cover this. shooting a sporting event or a concert can produce thousands of shots, why keep all of them? just to fill the harddrives?
maybe, the question is: what do you show your clients in the first place?
if i shoot 700 portraits of a model, i will “pre-select” the shots i am showing the model. from these 300, she might select her top 50. fair enough. what do i backup – 700, 300 or 50? i personally keep the “final selects” (which are maybe 10 of the 50) plus the “models selects” (the 50) on my system, and backup the 300 to external disk. and i delete 400.
on a wedding shoot – why keep 20 shots of oncle soandso, why not just keep the best 2…
i hear your message loud and clear scott! very good post and valid point!
I don’t think Step 4 is controversial at all – it makes perfect sense to me! That’s the way I’ve been doing my backups for a few years now; there’s no point keeping the junk and making life harder for yourself.
Hmm… what about BluRay?
What about online backup? You don’t have to care about buying new drives, they take care of all the security issues and you have a fixed rate, so it’s easy to calculate the cost (no unexpected hdd failures leading to unexpected costs).
I love backing up all my stuff even though it’s a proven fact to me that i don’t need most of those files. Regarding my photos i only delete the absolute obvious rejects (those that are even unsharp on my cameras lcd).
I can’t recommend using DVD’s as a back up solution to last. They can easyly be damage and even if not they don’t have a long life expectation. The third reason I don’t like media like CD or DVD is that we don’t know how long these formats are still supported. Everybody can still read CD’s but what about the gold old tapes we used to record music on? Not that long ago. So with CD’s or DVD’s or even BlueRay you have to consider that there’s a day coming when you have to move all your backed up data to another kind of storage.
….. but if your back up strategy is just about securing data for the next couple of years then DVD’s, flashdrives etc. are the fast, cheap and easy way to go IMO
Karsten
It’s worth noting that hard drives that are left on a shelf with out the occasional power up to keep the platters spinning run the risk of seizing up or other hardware issues.
@Karsten the online backup works if you only have a small amount of files. I wouldn’t want to have to back up large files regularly. You also put your faith in the service and they they will stick around.
I do like the flash drive option the best at the moment. But as with everything I’m sure they have their drawbacks too.
Good to get thoughts going in this area – I tend to keep everything on 2 sets of external drives, each set stored seperately (one at home, one at the office). Overkill probably, but I back up my real work (documents spreadsheets etc the same way).
USB drives are an interesting alternative, but most seem to only cite a 10 year or so storage life before the flash memory “forgets”. Not ideal for family photos where all, as you say, are precious to a degree.
I like the shoot in 4G chunks and do a DVD write suggested above – but again DVDs have a finite lifespan. Maybe we still need dusty old photo albums of prints for the really special moments
Phil
I think this flash back-up option is very good. Just think about how ‘green’ this option is as well. Keeping our files on a Drobo or other power consuming hard drives is a total waste of money when you measure how often you will actually look at the pics stored on a hard drive to the energy used to store them. Ok, it’s not *so* much energy but it’s a lot more than keeping those near-so-redundant pics on a flash drive.
James
Freiburg, Germany
Hi Scott,
I figure DVDs are cheap. What I do is import my images from my day’s work and immediately burn a DVD so I’ll have all images. I then go through and delete all of the blurry ones. I then go through and and remove all of the ones that I just don’t like. I then put the remaining images to backup before I work on them in post. This does sound time consuming, but it doesn’t really take that much time and I’ve always got all the images sitting there if I need them.
The Cover sheet I make for the DVDs with usually 12 thumbnails allows me to know what is on the disc at a glance.
See ya,
Mike
Is it possible to use the Drobo as a working drive vs a backup drive?
I’m a big believe in pruning. I try to think of keepng the number of shots from a shoot as I would a roll of film. Say I go to a party, shoot 350 photos. I’ll prune down to about 75 of the best, keep them and ditch the rest. I found that over the years, I really don’t NEED every single shot to recapture the essence and memory of the moment. While it might be NICE-TO-HAVE all the photos, completely not necessary.
Other people’s photos, I offload to DVD and put it in their hands to maintain, keeping only potential portfolio shots around. I’m lazy, what can I say. I’ve often though about doing some form of fancy encryption on the files.
As it is, I have more photos than anyone will ever want to look at.
Now, if I was building a library library of stock photos, I’m sure I’d think differently
Also, I want to say the argument that people always use where backup hard-drives get bigger and cheaper each year so it makes it easy to keep all these backups around…well, like you said the camera photos get larger, too, more than washing away gains in hard-drive size.
Oh, on other point, related to those guys above talking about wasting power with always available backups NASs, like the DROBO. I totally agree. About once a week, I turn on my backup NAS and move the files of my working PC. (I do get the photos on multiple drives on my pc immediately, though.)
One thing that maybe you could cover in the future, or maybe have others discussed, is backing up of Lightroom catalogs. I do backup specific libraries for the shoot. My worry is that in 5 years when I go to access it, I won’t be able to open the aged catalog in the latest version of Lightroom. Heck, maybe Lightroom isn’t even going to be in my workflow then. I’d still like to maintain the history of the edits…guess whenever the new tool of choice comes out, a third-party will write a conversion tool to sell, or something…
I also backup everything, including all of my Lightroom data, on two seperate external drives (besides the internal drive). One drive sits on my desk and I use it for day to day stuff.
The other is an external terabyte drive that I use for monthly backups, and usually keep if offsite or somewhere physically separate from my main compujter.
However, storage is just constantly getting larger and cheaper, so I don’t think about it all that much. Today, a one terabyte drive can be had for $129. By the time I fill that drive up, I’m confident that there will be a 2 terabyte drive available for $99. I just don’t think I’m eating up storage as fast as they’re producing it.
Anyway, that’s my story, and I’m sticking to it!
Thanks for the thought provoking article.
-Mark
Hi Scott,
First off, let’s not ever use the term “backing up too much.” As an IT professional, I cannot tell you how many files clients of mine have lost over the 25 years I have been in this business. I can tell people to backup their files until the cows come home and most of them still do not listen to me. The average person doesn’t think a hard drive will ever crash, files will be corrupted, laptops stolen, computers stolen, etc.,etc.
That said, as a photographer as well, I do tend to keep most of my family photos since they are a record of my past.
On a photography shoot, I do throw out everything that I do not like and “keep the keepers.” Some photos that are just slightly underexposed or overexposed I do keep as I shoot in RAW and the technology is getting better by leaps and bounds so that I do not want to trash those files.
There is a lot to be said of getting rid of the photos that just don’t cut it. Don’t be hesitant. Just do it. You know if it is good or not. Trust your judgment and hit that Delete key.
Yes, storage is getting cheaper and larger by the day with terabyte drives just coming into the mainstream. That’s a trillion characters! With RAID or a Drobo (which actually is a type of RAID) that can be expanded to a simple solution to store terabytes of data with redundancy.
However, just because we have the storage doesn’t mean we have to save every crappy photo we ever took.
Bottom line, let’s prune our files that we can but let’s never tell anyone they are backing up too much. Also, you can back up at home (I have a secondary hard drive plus an external drive.) That’s fine, but you also have to bring that data OFFSITE. How many people do you know that do that? Not many.
Also, flash drives are really for moving data, not storing data long term.
Copy everything to a Drobo, NAS , external hard drive drive and take it OFFSITE whenever you add a substantial amount of photos to your library.
BTW, love your books. Reading the LR2 book now and have already pre-ordered your CS4 book. You are amazing.
Thanks.
Andrew Klafter
I personally like the flash drive thing – I started doing my back ups that way – and plan on purchasing Flash drives with my logo on them for just that purpose. DVDs, can scratch and are BIG and a flash drive is so small. Its always been how I deliver files to people I second shoot for – I think it will work well for clients too.
Scott,
I actually utilize Time Machine since its already built into the mac.
I import from camera to external drive via lightroom, Lightroom catalog file is on the same external drive. Do my work on those photos on the external and at the same time, Time Machine is backing them up to another external along with my system in general.
Jeff
Hey Scott,
simple idea but pretty clever! Delegate all the backups you can to separate drives. Never really thought about it that way!
M
Why use USB thumb drives when SD cards are even smaller, and easier to archive along with a paper archive. About the same price as thumb drives as well I think.
As for DVD’s, you get archival quality ones that have a much longer guarantied life span. Much prizier though.
That said, the National Library in Norway rewrites every CD in their archive every 10 years, I think.
Scott, I wholeheartedly agree, but can I ask that an issue I have been having is addressed, and let me say to start that I’m sure this is only my issue stemming from incorrect backup. Once loaded onto PC & filtered for saving only the better shots, I am finding when doing a backup that I am doubling ALL of my photos instead of only the newest ones. Can you recommend an article, or an application which could help me understand what it is I am not understanding? Then I am worried that if I delete one set it will delete all sets so I have this vast over-backed up number of images.
I never thought of using the flashdrives like that- brilliant!
Those are the kind of tips I like to get- like the ones I haven’t thought of….
I think that throwing things away comes harder to those of us that grew up shooting film. It’s not like you would take a pair of scissors and cut negatives out of a strip to put in the garbage. Now the decision of what to keep needs to be more of a rational process over an emotional one. When I posted about reclaiming hard drive space on my laptop, the number one culprit for eating up space was my RAW image files. By the time I backed up the good ones and trashed the ones I would never use need, I ended up reclaiming about 20 GB of space. That’s a lot of real estate on a 150 GB hard drive. It’s time to overcome our habits of the past and move on to practical image archiving. Great post Scott!
Another solution is for us to stop letting the camera makers wow us with more megapixels. 21, 25 these are huge files. I really think we is pro (that would be others) and seasoned amateurs (that would be me) have to start saying NO to the ridiculous sensor size and look instead to the camera makers for better handling of low and high light conditions
My $0.02
JPO
Scott,
You really haven’t touched the tip of the iceberg. Your space requirements are small compared to someone who is scanning 35mm or even medium format or even (heaven forbid) large format film at 16 bit resolution. You could argue that, well you have the film. But I have found that I am correcting film images where the film has started to “change”. I think that ultimately, one needs to be ruthless in editing your images to be backed up. Years from now when the person comes batch from the wedding you shot, will not remember the 600 or so images that she did not like in the first place.
Think about it.
Paul
I recommend gold dvds for backup. I have had too many a hard drive fail and it becomes more problematic than its worth.
Gold dvds have a lifespan of 100 years, so they are going to outlive us. Proper storage in a jacket and there shouldnt be too much worry over issues of scratching and problems with it.
Drobos rock to, they have some serious capabilities, but I also prefer the catalog on a dvd. Just a thought.
I’m glad to see others thinking about this. I’ve come to the conclusion that we’ve been thinking about this a bit backwards. While software such as Lightroom can be made to work the way I work, it’s not a no-brainer to do so.
To me, there are four categories of images on my drives:
1. Archive: this is everything I’ve shot. Because I’m mostly a landscape photographer, it’s primary organization is PLACE/LOCATION/DATE. While it looks like I’ve repeated something in the folder heirarchy, PLACE is Country and sometimes State, LOCATION is the actual physical place. So I’m just back from Alaska and have US_AK/DENALI/8-2008.
2. Work: this is the selects from the Archive. These are the images I feel that represent my work, in their native state, basically.
3. Worked: these are images from Work that I’ve actually taken the time to do a full post production pass on and get ready for “consumption,” whatever that means ;~). Okay, it means: ready to show to others.
Before I discuss #4 I need to discuss how these first three categories really work. Do we just create an Archive (Lightroom Catalog) and then create Work and Worked in that Catalog by performing actions and using markings? My answer is no. Archive is created by direct card->drive. A Lightroom Catalog is created by importing images for Work. Work and Worked live in the same Catalog (hey Adobe, where’s the “This image is considered completed” tag? Yes, I know I can dedicate one of the flags to this, but I don’t want to because I use them for other organization). Thus, one flaw I find with Lightroom is that I can’t easily do this #1, #2, and #3 organization on the fly, especially when traveling. I really want a “tagger” sidekick product: the Lightroom Ingest only with the ability to define my categories. When I get home I then want that ingest to be parsed appropriately to my Archive and Work (Archive to folder structure on a specified drive, Work into my Lightroom Catalog). I currently do this OUTSIDE of Lightroom.
Which brings us to #4:
4. Backup. This is a complete copy of the Archive, and it’s a complete copy of Work and Worked (my Lightroom Catalog and associated files). Moreover, it’s actually two copies. One lives on-site, one off-site.
The question Scott is raising is whether you really need the Archive or not. For me, yes. When I need images that failed for teaching purposes, I can almost always find them in my Archive ;~). Likewise, one of the things I teach is to examine what did and didn’t work the last time you visited a place. If you don’t keep your non-keepers, you’re relying upon memory as to what didn’t work. I can look at my Alaska Archive, for example, and find all kinds of things I’ve tried that didn’t work, and that provides me an opportunity to think about why they didn’t work just before I head off to my next trip there. If you’re really anal (some say I am ;~), then you can run statistics on what you shot. Am I getting a better keeper rate now than I did the first time I went there? Am I using one lens more often than another? Of the failure photographs is there a trend in aperture, shutter speed, focal length, camera, whatever? Being self-critical is always hard, but statistics are very difficult to dismiss the way you do anecdotal evidence.
Scott,
USB flash drives are not reliable enough for long term storage. The memory decays much faster than hard disks or DVD’s/CDs.
A hard drive has a mechanical lifespan of 5-10 years (on the shelf – 2-3 if it’s used). CD-ROM disks start to fail after 5-10 years depending on the quality, and DVD-ROM’s probably after about 10 years (they haven’t been around long enough to have a good sample).
I recently had to copy over a bunch of 8 year old cd-rom’s after a couple started to fail spontaneously (without having been used). I’ve had USB flash drives fade in less than a year (and they’re notoriously sensitive to static discharge).
You’d be much better off burning two copies of DVD-ROMS and storing them in separate locations. After 5 years, test them once a year. When the first backup fails, replace both.
Make sure you store your media under 70 degrees, laying flat, in low humidity, and away from solvents and chemicals (i.e. a gun safe is a bad idea).
It would be great if Lightroom itself could help manage the backup process in a similar way to the way smart collections work. I always thought an approach like this might work very well:
1. Import Into Lightroom
2. One set of files goes to your “Working Destination”
3. The other set goes to your “Backup Destination”
4. The database maintains a link between these to file sets.
5. Your “Working” file sets is just that delete and edit at will.
6. You set certain “smart” filters in your preferences for how your “backup” data is handled.
6a. Example — If you reject an image in your working set lightroom knows to delete it from the backup 7 days later (or when space is needed).
6b. Example — If you flag an image as a pick, Lightroom knows to also backup a copy of the “Working” file.
6c. Example – If you give a flagged image 3 stars Lightroom it could add it to weekly queue for offsite storage or even better upload it in the evening to a service.
My idea would be that all of the above smart backup settings would be customizable.
Hey Scott;
I usually don’t shoot many pictures at one event anyway (I’m an old film convert). I usually purchase a new SD card for my camera and use it like a roll of film (they are only about $10 for a 1gig card now). I shoot RAW and just file the SD card away after downloading the images to my computer. So in essence, I’m using the SD card for long-term archival storage of my “negatives.” What do you think?
I was looking through some old 6×7 transparencies (remember those?) the other evening and found a few I’d dismissed as unusable years ago. My fear is deleting too quickly.
Hi Scott,
Great article that has really got me thinking. Having never considered it, I really like the idea of using Flash Drives for say Wedding Shoots especially and filing that flash drive with all the clients paperwork etc…
It’s a real coincidence that you’ve done this article now cos I’m just at the point when I need yet another external hard drive to add to the ever growing collection.
Would you consider doing a practical demo of this process (ie dragging the photos onto the external hard drive replacing the original back up) on say PhotoshopUser TV at some point?
Thanks again for a superb post which amongst other benefits is no doubt gonna save a fortune.
Best wishes,
Glyn
This is a very timely subject for me, as i have just had to rethink my entire backup strategy. That is because I recently had a Drobo drive stop working correctly. I was very lucky and the problem was fixed without losing any data but here is what I was told that it was not safe to trust the Drobo without having another backup.
The OS X’s HFS+ file system had been corrupted. What this meant was that even with the redundant backup the drobo offered, none of the information was accessible because the file structure was corrupted. Luckily Disk Warrior fixed the problem, but after speaking with the Drobo tech support, I now back every bit of information up on DVDs.
I do use flash drives as backup of my books when I am writing them, along with time machine that backs up my laptop everyday. But I no longer trust the Drobo not to fail. It makes no difference if it is a file structure error or a drive crash, the end result is that I can’t get my data.
From a photographer’s perspective, yes we probably are.
From a sys admin perspective, no.
I just want to second Doug Lhotka’s comment — USB flash drives have a high failure rate, particularly amongst the cheaper variants.
If you go that route, you should use two USB flash drives so that you have an A and a B copy. Those drives should be tested annually (what a pain!) and similar to other media, once one fails, replace both.
-Chris
Thank you, thank you, thank you Scott. The system you have described is one I have been following for a while. I don’t use Lightroom, I use Aperture, but I began to notice that I was stuck in this backup mode, saving images that I would never ever use, because they were test shots, out of focus shots or just simply unusable.
I started deleting the bad shots and keeping the 1, 3 or 5 star images, then I backed up the remaining files. I have followed this system now for a year, I have no regrets, and a lot more hard drive space.
PS. I don’t use 2 or 4 stars (I should thank you for that tip too Scott
Scott, When I was shooting film, primarily U/W, on location the workflow was to review the processed film strips, cut out and mount the keepers, and toss the rest. Now today I look back and know there were thousands of wonderful images lost for lack of todays technologies. I say find a way to keep even those images that by your standards today are marginal. You never know what the future brings. Thanks for your books, and thought provoking posts.
There gets a point where backing up can become backing up for its own sake, when paranoia takes over from precaution.
I agree 100% with your comments about family photographs.
As for wedding photographers dealing with other people’s precious memories, your suggestion is a good one. A statement in a contract about files being kept for a clearly stated, limited period, would allow the shooter to delete files with a clear conscience; unless that photographer thinks keeping every single shot offers the slight prospect of future sales dollars offsetting continuous bills for buying more back up space.
Balliolman
Hi Scott,
my backup strategy is exactly like yours since I use Lightroom. Especially point 4. A realize that I never missed a photo I deleted. These bad shots only waste drive space and you definitely won’t look at them anymore!
Have a great weekend,
Markus
Scott,
Great topic. I recently used Archive Creator by Michael Tapes (on a trial basis) to archive my files to gold DVD’s. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to purchase the software because the program is no longer supported. By the way, it’s a GREAT piece of software … too bad it’s not available. Do you, or anyone else know of good archive software that can split large folders into multiple DVD’s and also provide html thumbnail indexes?
Thanks
You can say what you want, but shortly after Scotts last post about backing up hit the blog, guess what? My 1TB maxtor with 2 500GBs setup as a Raid0 crashes. Not pretty… Data recovery wants 4900-$6900 to get my images. WHAT! No I’m not kidding. And with that price came a big maybe. Forget it. Luckily I only lost a few images that I only had on that drive arrangement, but one of them was one of my all-time favorite shots of my 9 year old skateboarding.
So the lesson is BACKUP!!!!
@ Tom Moore – I like your thinking. A system that functioned like that in Lightroom would be awesome.
Scott, and what if instead of putting the backup pictures in pen drives you burn two identical DVDs?
Scott,
Quality topic, but because 95% of my images are of family I’m at a loss (of HD space!). The few times I have taken pictures for others I ended up picking my/their favorites and deleting the rest from Lightroom. I then burned a CD for myself and them, keeping the picks in Lightroom for TimeMachine to archive.
I should add to my family shots comment… in situations where I take 5-6 frames of the same setting in hopes that both kids are actually at the camera for one of them, they’ll be stacked in LR and I’ll end up keeping just one even if a few turned out fine.
Depending on how you are doing this final step:
So far, so good, but after I’m done editing, deleting, keywording, etc. I then drag that folder from computer over to the Drobo, and replace the original back-up with this final edited set. (Yikes!).
You need to be real careful because you might be exposing yourself to a period of time where you actually only have a single copy. The only reason I bring that up is because you used the word “replace.” I’m betting you already do it this way, but if not, it’d be way safer to make another brand new copy on the drobo with the edited files, and THEN delete the original backup. That way, you maintain two copies throughout the process (in case something corrupts mid-copy.
Another question is if we really need the full quality of RAW or DNG photo files, or we could export the photos for backup to high quality jpg files and reduce the needed spae a lot.
I also have a Drobo and follow a similar workflow. Since the drobo spreads my files out over 2 drives (up to 4) automatically, I essentially have 2 backups. I use your method as described in the Lightroom 2 Book flagging as picks or rejects, then delete the rejected ones. If I know I don’t need these client photos anymore, I will put them on a disk and then get rid of them out of the Drobo. At the end of each year, I burn my photos to disk and label as 2007 Disk 1 etc.
One thing that hasn’t been mentioned is off site back up. I don’t do it now, but know that I should. If a fire was to break out, all my backups, drobo is worthless.
To the person who asked if Drobo can be a working drive instead of a backup… yes.. I use it for that.
To the person who said the Drobo wastes power, consider I used the Green Western Digital 1TB Drives that use less power…
Following Scott’s advice in the new Lightroom Book, we could save about 20% of space but converting RAW files to DNG. Of course, you would have to shoot RAW first.
http://aws.amazon.com/s3/
$0.150/month/GiB, backed up in multiple datacenters. if your house burns down or that mean rival photog takes a hammer to your computer and your pile of (probably frozen) disc drives…yawn. just like any backup system it’s up to you to be religious, but there are free or inexpensive apps that can help with the automation.
I been hanging with an old pro getting tips and what not from her. She prints out her work besides backing up to another hdd and dvd. her way of thinking is she can always scan the 8×10 keepers down the road if she needs the shot (s) if her media back ups have failed.