<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s &#8220;Guest Blog Wednesday&#8221; featuring Richard Harrington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:27:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pam Borrelli</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-97960</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Borrelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-97960</guid>
		<description>Rich - I am going to upgrade from my G5 to a new MacPro- I also plan to  add 8GB of RAM  - What is the  &quot;1 TB if internal storage for $145&quot; that you mention you purchased? Should I get that too?
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich &#8211; I am going to upgrade from my G5 to a new MacPro- I also plan to  add 8GB of RAM  &#8211; What is the  &#8220;1 TB if internal storage for $145&#8243; that you mention you purchased? Should I get that too?<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94925</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94925</guid>
		<description>Nick...

I&#039;m not saying ONLY Camera Raw, Lightroom, or Aperture... just applications LIKE those.  Capture NX is a nice tool... I&#039;ve dabbled with it.  I really like Nik software&#039;s tools and I too shoot with a D300.

The point is, that tool also gives you the speed benefits of Raw.  

With that said, both Adobe and Apple are in the business of making competitive software (which means innovation as well as fixing flaws).  Post to them directly, they do listen and might be able to make changes you&#039;d desire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying ONLY Camera Raw, Lightroom, or Aperture&#8230; just applications LIKE those.  Capture NX is a nice tool&#8230; I&#8217;ve dabbled with it.  I really like Nik software&#8217;s tools and I too shoot with a D300.</p>
<p>The point is, that tool also gives you the speed benefits of Raw.  </p>
<p>With that said, both Adobe and Apple are in the business of making competitive software (which means innovation as well as fixing flaws).  Post to them directly, they do listen and might be able to make changes you&#8217;d desire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links - October 24, 2008 &#171; Photo Notes: Photography by Patty Hankins and Bill Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94916</link>
		<dc:creator>Links - October 24, 2008 &#171; Photo Notes: Photography by Patty Hankins and Bill Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94916</guid>
		<description>[...] Photoshop Insider has a guest post from Richard Harrington on Regaining Your Digital Life [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photoshop Insider has a guest post from Richard Harrington on Regaining Your Digital Life [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94855</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94855</guid>
		<description>Well, I &quot;object&quot; one thing. Unfortunately neither ACR, LR take Nikon&#039;s D300 custom curves and even if they don&#039;t, when I open my raw files most of the landscape ones that include a looot of sky and clouds looks plain HORRIBLE and it would take ages to reach somethings similar to what I shot. 
Likewise my Infrared raw files taken with my converted D50 look TERRIBLE, really awfully bad.

bottom line and to my total disappointment, i find myself restricted to Capture NX, a software I despise but at least gets me the right colors.
I looooove LR, I loooove PS but what can I do if they don&#039;t get the RAW colors right ....hopeless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I &#8220;object&#8221; one thing. Unfortunately neither ACR, LR take Nikon&#8217;s D300 custom curves and even if they don&#8217;t, when I open my raw files most of the landscape ones that include a looot of sky and clouds looks plain HORRIBLE and it would take ages to reach somethings similar to what I shot.<br />
Likewise my Infrared raw files taken with my converted D50 look TERRIBLE, really awfully bad.</p>
<p>bottom line and to my total disappointment, i find myself restricted to Capture NX, a software I despise but at least gets me the right colors.<br />
I looooove LR, I loooove PS but what can I do if they don&#8217;t get the RAW colors right &#8230;.hopeless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94836</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94836</guid>
		<description>Sorry for delay... been at Photo Expo in NYC

Quick responses (sorry so brief... going on stage in 10 minutes)

To Walter Chin â€“ Check out Other World Computing... they have a RAM Finder.  From memory (joke intended) that computer tops out at 1 GB.  Its about $100 to do so.

To Chris â€“ To Each their own....  just my opinions...   You can technically use Camera Raw with JPEGs now too....

To Terry â€“ That&#039;s a GREAT Tip

To Zsolti â€“Â Double click an actions name and a pop-up window comes up.. you pick the f-Key and modifiers there.

To goDonato -I always buy non Apple RAM but leave the pre-installed in there when possible, or swap out if needed.  BUT  some third party stuff is apple certified.

TO Jon Haverstick  â€“ I use that too....  that makes us geeks!  Good tip...  others if you like Image processor.... go there!

Gotta run....  keep the comments flowing guys.

=)

-Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for delay&#8230; been at Photo Expo in NYC</p>
<p>Quick responses (sorry so brief&#8230; going on stage in 10 minutes)</p>
<p>To Walter Chin â€“ Check out Other World Computing&#8230; they have a RAM Finder.  From memory (joke intended) that computer tops out at 1 GB.  Its about $100 to do so.</p>
<p>To Chris â€“ To Each their own&#8230;.  just my opinions&#8230;   You can technically use Camera Raw with JPEGs now too&#8230;.</p>
<p>To Terry â€“ That&#8217;s a GREAT Tip</p>
<p>To Zsolti â€“Â Double click an actions name and a pop-up window comes up.. you pick the f-Key and modifiers there.</p>
<p>To goDonato -I always buy non Apple RAM but leave the pre-installed in there when possible, or swap out if needed.  BUT  some third party stuff is apple certified.</p>
<p>TO Jon Haverstick  â€“ I use that too&#8230;.  that makes us geeks!  Good tip&#8230;  others if you like Image processor&#8230;. go there!</p>
<p>Gotta run&#8230;.  keep the comments flowing guys.</p>
<p>=)</p>
<p>-Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Haverstick</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Haverstick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94832</guid>
		<description>Great post, Rich!

RE: Image Processor... I recommend to my students that they use the FREE Dr. Brown&#039;s Services scripts (whichever version applies to their version of Photoshop) as in addition to all the functionality of Photoshop&#039;s Image Processor, it also gives you the option to resize pixel dimensions and resolution, and convert the colorspace.  It&#039;s great for batch processing images for the web when you want to convert to sRGB (I shoot Adobe 1998, which looks pretty flat on the web). And it can be invoked from Bridge by selecting the thumbnails of the images you want to process, choosing Tools &gt; Photoshop &gt; Dr. Brown&#039;s 1-2-3 Process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Rich!</p>
<p>RE: Image Processor&#8230; I recommend to my students that they use the FREE Dr. Brown&#8217;s Services scripts (whichever version applies to their version of Photoshop) as in addition to all the functionality of Photoshop&#8217;s Image Processor, it also gives you the option to resize pixel dimensions and resolution, and convert the colorspace.  It&#8217;s great for batch processing images for the web when you want to convert to sRGB (I shoot Adobe 1998, which looks pretty flat on the web). And it can be invoked from Bridge by selecting the thumbnails of the images you want to process, choosing Tools &gt; Photoshop &gt; Dr. Brown&#8217;s 1-2-3 Process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goDonato</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94824</link>
		<dc:creator>goDonato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94824</guid>
		<description>What about buying non-apple ram? If you have a problem &amp; call Apple Care, the first thing they tell you is to pull out the non-apple sticks. If your program is RAM intensive, you might not have enough to start the app &amp; run it. I&#039;ve been there.
-dMR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about buying non-apple ram? If you have a problem &amp; call Apple Care, the first thing they tell you is to pull out the non-apple sticks. If your program is RAM intensive, you might not have enough to start the app &amp; run it. I&#8217;ve been there.<br />
-dMR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megan russell</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94792</link>
		<dc:creator>megan russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94792</guid>
		<description>Wow. Can I just say thank you? The Image Processor Script feature alone is going to save me many hours... super super grateful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Can I just say thank you? The Image Processor Script feature alone is going to save me many hours&#8230; super super grateful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zsolti</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94762</link>
		<dc:creator>Zsolti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94762</guid>
		<description>Hi!

How can you map an action to a function key?

Zsolti</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>How can you map an action to a function key?</p>
<p>Zsolti</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94721</link>
		<dc:creator>GT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94721</guid>
		<description>Great post Rich and simple but really logical way of looking at web site, blogs and podcast.  I will adapt that right now, so THANKS.

Totally agree with the working faster especially with hot keys.  I teach a lot of software and as soon as I start the workflow in any software, I start telling them to remember the hot keys.  But, now I&#039;m starting to look into that workspace custom fitting to my needs.  But a huge problem with the action scripts for me, is that I did start to create some but started to forget the step of my scripts.  So, I avoid scripts or action you call it, because then it forces me to remember the hotkeys and where to find them.

Chris, as you mention taking 700 photos for a sporting event would be enormous data.  I agree with getting it right in the first place.  With the RAW files being so big but being so full of information, what to do.  I would have to say that I&#039;m one of those &quot;RAW aholic&quot;, and maybe that is why LaCie really likes my addiction, with 5 external hardrive at my feet, I never get cold feet!!!  But it all depends on what you want to do in post production and for me I need the RAW data but if you don&#039;t need, why even bother!  
&quot;I get annoyed when JPG-only shooters get pilloried.&quot;  I don&#039;t thing that Rich was trying to do that, I think that if you have the need and the space for it, why not.  That is how I see it.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Rich and simple but really logical way of looking at web site, blogs and podcast.  I will adapt that right now, so THANKS.</p>
<p>Totally agree with the working faster especially with hot keys.  I teach a lot of software and as soon as I start the workflow in any software, I start telling them to remember the hot keys.  But, now I&#8217;m starting to look into that workspace custom fitting to my needs.  But a huge problem with the action scripts for me, is that I did start to create some but started to forget the step of my scripts.  So, I avoid scripts or action you call it, because then it forces me to remember the hotkeys and where to find them.</p>
<p>Chris, as you mention taking 700 photos for a sporting event would be enormous data.  I agree with getting it right in the first place.  With the RAW files being so big but being so full of information, what to do.  I would have to say that I&#8217;m one of those &#8220;RAW aholic&#8221;, and maybe that is why LaCie really likes my addiction, with 5 external hardrive at my feet, I never get cold feet!!!  But it all depends on what you want to do in post production and for me I need the RAW data but if you don&#8217;t need, why even bother!<br />
&#8220;I get annoyed when JPG-only shooters get pilloried.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t thing that Rich was trying to do that, I think that if you have the need and the space for it, why not.  That is how I see it.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94718</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m never surprised at the class of professionals that scotts get&#039;s to come on this blog. Great job here and thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m never surprised at the class of professionals that scotts get&#8217;s to come on this blog. Great job here and thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanvalek.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203/comment-page-1#comment-94670</link>
		<dc:creator>alanvalek.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/2203#comment-94670</guid>
		<description>Great post Richard.

To Walter:

If I were you I wouldn&#039;t buy anything but a new computer, I would have an newer computer before I bought any software, especially if I owned a G4, you can even get a new(er) iMac that won&#039;t set you back too much compared to a new tower. I would say get an Intel chip computer because apparently the new &quot;Snow leoaprd&quot; OS won&#039;t even support a G5 anymore, not to mention that my dual G5 with 8GB of ram is already starting to see the downsides of performance with CS4 how certain things are becoming slower than my Intel Laptop with 1GB of ram, and it&#039;s only going to get worse when CS5 comes out!!! The computer world is fast moving, and if you want to play, you need to keep up unfortunately. Here are some places online were you can purchase used Macs at a pretty decent price. Good luck.

http://www.macofalltrades.com/

http://www.powermax.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Richard.</p>
<p>To Walter:</p>
<p>If I were you I wouldn&#8217;t buy anything but a new computer, I would have an newer computer before I bought any software, especially if I owned a G4, you can even get a new(er) iMac that won&#8217;t set you back too much compared to a new tower. I would say get an Intel chip computer because apparently the new &#8220;Snow leoaprd&#8221; OS won&#8217;t even support a G5 anymore, not to mention that my dual G5 with 8GB of ram is already starting to see the downsides of performance with CS4 how certain things are becoming slower than my Intel Laptop with 1GB of ram, and it&#8217;s only going to get worse when CS5 comes out!!! The computer world is fast moving, and if you want to play, you need to keep up unfortunately. Here are some places online were you can purchase used Macs at a pretty decent price. Good luck.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macofalltrades.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.macofalltrades.com/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.powermax.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.powermax.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
