It’s “Guest Blog Wednesday” featuring Tim Grey

Adding Mood to a Photograph
This may sound a little silly coming from a certified Photoshop junkie, but my tendency when optimizing a photo is actually to try to make it look as close to reality as possible. Sure, I’ll add a slight touch of “what I remember†to take it beyond “what it really was,†but by and large my aim with Photoshop is to produce an image that accurately reflects the beautiful scene I chose to photograph in the first place.
But sometimes that just doesn’t cut it.
I find the desire to push a photo beyond reality usually occurs when I’m a little disappointed with a photograph that I really thought would turn out better. Most often that disappointment is a result of having had an emotional response to the scene that can’t adequately be captured in a simple photograph.
A recent trip to Japan provides a couple great examples of this. I started off in Tokyo, and was fascinated by many of the sights. I found myself particularly drawn to the small temples and shrines that hid behind and between large buildings on major streets in some of the busier parts of Tokyo. These temples and shrines provided a remarkable sanctuary, and some great photographic opportunities.
In one case there were three shrines that shared a courtyard, and a small cemetery adjacent to the courtyard. I’m always intrigued by cemeteries, particularly to learn about how different cultures honor those who have passed on. In the corner of this cemetery a collection of wooden planks with Japanese writing on them caught my eye. I was later told these were “prayer sticks†that would be placed at the gravesite by family or friends. I captured an image, confident it would convey the solemn tranquility of this place.

Somehow the image simply didn’t elicit the feeling I was expecting. Sure, it is always a very different experience to view a photograph compared to the actual scene. So I started working with the image in Photoshop to see what I could come up with. I tried various adjustments, and then ventured into slightly more creative areas. I tried a black-and-white conversion. That helped. Then I applied a sepia-tone effect. Better. A boost in contrast and a vignette effect, and I was much happier with the image.

My next stop was Kyoto, and I knew I was in for a treat. This is a city with over 2,000 shrines and temples, 17 UNESCO World Heritage Sites, and a tremendous amount of history. It also contains many wonderful Zen gardens, and it seemed each one I visited was more calming than the one before it.
One garden in particular got me clicking the shutter more than usual (and “usual†is still quite a lot!). I wandered around the garden looking for the best angle, tried a variety of different perspectives, and ultimately found the vantage point that seemed to best capture the incredible beauty of this garden.
But I was disappointed again.

You have to understand, to stand in a garden like this—with beautiful plants, ponds, gravel, and more, all manicured to perfection and seemingly created for the sole purpose of calming the mind—is an amazing experience. I wanted so badly for the photo I captured to contain that experience so I could share it with others. But none of the ethereal magic seemed to exist in the photo.
So once again I set out seeing what I might be able to do in Photoshop to insert the mood I felt in the Zen garden into the photograph. After much experimentation I settled on a simulated infrared effect, with boosted greens, a slight glow, and a touch of faux film grain. The result seemed much more magical, and did a much better job of communicating the experience of the garden.

I love that Photoshop provides such a rich environment for experimentation, enabling us to explore creativity for a photographic image in any way we like. On many occasions I’ve been able to find surreal ways to interpret an image, producing a result I’m much happier with compared to a more realistic version of the image.
–Tim Grey



















Thanks Tim! I greatly enjoyed your post.
It’s a a pleasure to learn about the “whys” of great photographers and not only about the “hows”, and you’ve done a wonderful job.
And thanks Scott, for such a rich blog.
Josep
Tim Great Article I like it easy to read!
I really like the turn out of the pray sticks really like the mood with that.
Have a good one and keep on photographing
Dwayne.D.C.Tucker II
Nassau,Bahamas
http://DwayneTucker.com/blog
Thoroughly enjoyed your post and will be thinking much more about the emotion a shot is meant to convey going forward. Thank you.
So right Tim. Adding mood can make a huge difference. Sometimes I find a photo that just lacks something and spending a few minutes burning and dodging ads that magical feeling that was missing.
I think we should also be open to trying something simple (like a sepia) or other little things than can bring out the mood we are trying to covey.
Gavin
seimeffects.com
Thanks I enjoyed reading. I rarely dare to modify images as creatively as you do. Thanks for giving me a new push to try this.
I agree, Tim, a photograph can be more than an image.
Wow, Great post
Tim i’m going to japan soon as well,
What lens did you use the most while you were in japan ?
if any of my pictures don’t turn out quite the way i want them ill make sure to keep this post in mind.
Thanks again !
Hi Tim,
A good post and I love the transform from an interesting shot to one with real depth of emotion with the prayer sticks.
Personally I think the zen garden is a miss and suffers from weak composition but that’s my own opinion. Perhaps more interest if shot from floor level but hey I’m not a landscape man
I often find a change to B+W can hide a multitude of skin problems in the portraits I shoot. I had a baby with a black eye come in on the weekend and a quick fix to B+W made the yellow bruising fade away (quicker than the healing tool in a colour picture).
Hi Tim,
Just returned from a great photo trip myself and I have some pictures to correct, i´ts like adding soul to a body because it is not just what you see that counts. It´s also about the feeling that you experience, just as you say. Thank you for sharing your your experience and photos before and after.
Ben
Hi Tim,
Thanks for a great post. I always attempt to simply make my photos look the way I remember the scene. Your insight will aid me into a more creative way of looking at the final product if it isn’t what I want to convey.
Thanks Scott for another great guest blogger,
Mike
Thanks Tim for your creative insights.
when I shot with my 35mm camera I knew that the type of film would influence the outcome of my images.
Even now with DSLR cameras, I still become emulsional about my images thanks to photoshop.
Tim,
I love the end product for your photos. Moreover, I think your description of creating surreal or altered images in order to bring them in line with the emotional response one experiences while snapping away captures both the reasons why many of us photograph and why some of us spend time crafting the photo in Photoshop and Lightroom.
Thanks for the wonderful post!
Eric
Great post Tim!
It reaffirms my belief that an image, is not necessarily “fixed” in photoshop as much as “finished” in photoshop. When on vacation it sometimes is not feasable to go back at the magic light hours or wait until the weather is just right and the stars are aligned. At those times the most important thing to do is previsualize what you intend the finished image to be and nail your composition. After all, photoshop is as much a photographer’s tool as a lens or filter.
I recently had the opportunity to photograph a steam locomotive and its crew. Even though I did the shoot in color, I went into it with the intention that the final images would be B&W. The end result being that I was “finishing” rather than “fixing” in photoshop.
Tim,
Thanks for a great post. I find myself thinking similar things when I evaluate images that I have taken. I really think that Ansel Adams had it right when he referred to the negative as the score and the print as the performance. Today the ‘print’ may or may not be something on paper, but perhaps just sometime to display on a monitor, but the process of converting the camera image to a finished product is conceptually the same as taking a negative and producing the final print. Your “prayer sticks” image is a perfect example. The ‘raw’ shot is nicely composed and lit, but it lacks something. Your finished image really brings out some additional qualities the produce a beautiful end result.
Thanks again for a wondeful post.
Jim
Thanks for the great post today
Ken in KY
Enjoyed your post today…..But then I look forward to all my communications from you as I am a DDQ subscriber and have gained valuable information from you. If people don’t know about you they should check out your website.
Tim:
I really appreciate your post today. You seemed to have found the words to describe exactly how I approach many images. So many times I have been disappointed by the image I captured- because what was in my head/ heart was different from the outcome. However, I too have found that the Photoshop simply enhances pushes my creativity. I have learned that the only limitations are my own creativity.
Thanks again!
Myles
Las Cruces, NM
Great way to show others what you felt, not what you saw! There has long been an argument about what the limits are in photography to stay ‘real.’ Trying to convey a 3D world on a 2D plane is impossible to begin with so the argument is moot. You have proven that with this post. You embody Ansel Adams’ idea of previsualization. You thought it was Zen, when what it was, was photographic history!
Finishing with tools in the electronic age is the equivalent of darkroom work in the film days. Has anyone ever seen a black sky over Half Dome? No, not in reality, but in most of Ansel’s imagery. Does it deter from it being art? No, So your view of Japan is how you experienced it and sharing it with us gives us insight into both you and the sense of place you gained from your travels. Well done!
Great post, Tim, thanks for sharing. I think you really underscored the point that photographs should always be made in the camera first, but often need to be “massaged” in processing for them to reach their full potential. And when capturing a scene, thinking about the processing that may be done later can help us make more appropriate shooting decisions.
We hear so much about getting everything “right” in the camera, and certainly we need to do the best that we can (with all that that implies). Some photographers are very judgmental about post-processing. However, as you so well illustrate, the digital darkroom is a whole realm of creativity; it is a place for art as well as craft. My hunch is that if you put your print on display in a gallery, most people outside of the photography community would respond only to the finished product. Furthermore, and this is part of why I love being an amateur, my primary goal is to create something that speaks to my own heart and spirit.
I dont know if this is the spot for this. I see Scott uses the 18-200mm VR f/3.5 – f/5.6 lens. What is the difference, if any, between that lens and the lens I got with my D300 (Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED-IF AF-S VR DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens). I hear people talk about it. Is the difference simply an urban legend or a legitimate concern that I am underutilizing my camera with inferior equipment.
Thank you so much.
Tim (like SK) is passionate about photography, I get his daily update where he answers a variety of digital imaging questions.
You can sign up for his Digital Darkroom Questions (DDQ) mailing list by visiting his blog or maybe it was his website.
http://www.timgrey.com
tim@timgrey.com
Books: http://www.timgrey.com/books/index.htm
Blog: http://www.timgrey.com/blog
I think the black and white of the prayer sticks with sepia toning ends up looking like the actual color scene. Couldn’t help but think of Ansel Adams, as another reader did, who created shots that continue to frustrate visitors to Yosemite even today. Great post and right on the money–exactly the kind of thing I wrestle with, having a journalism degree as I do and swearing allegiance to the sometimes ugly truth of a scene.
Amazing job with those photos. I love the way the edited versions really tell a story and relate how those places made you feel.
Hi Tim,
I’m new back into photography and run into the atmosphere problem all the time. Not always, but enough to know I haven’t captured the spirit of the setting.
And living in Thailand, there’s a lot of spirit to be found so I’ll try your methods of tweaking to share what I’m seeing / feeling / experiencing.
@Steve in post #21
I believe they are one and the same. You just have a bit more info put on the name of yours. You can have a look at the Nikon site to see what lenses they have.
On the topic, I think you hit some good points. As said before its not so much creating in photoshop more finishing.
Great post.
great examples, Tim
would it be possible for us ps-novices to get a tutorial on how to get this bw-infrared effect applied to our images?
thank you.
I am still pretty new to serious photography. I’ve been a shutterbug for years, but have recently invested more time and a lot more money into improving my photography.
I really enjoyed your post, Tim. My main subject is my 2 year old daughter. Chasing a toddler with a camera makes it extremely difficult to “get the shot” sometimes. Your post reminds me that it’s not a sin to tweak in post-processing so I get the best version of the shot I took.
How did you do the infrared? I love the photo, and your adjustment, thanks for sharing.
i also found the infrared example most interesting. a pity, that no how-to was provided – or a disappointment.
Thank you so much to everyone who had very kind things to say about my post and the photos. Much appreciated!
To those who were hoping for a tutorial on the infrared technique I use, never fear! I’ve written an article for TakeGreatPictures.com that includes the tutorial used for the exact same Zen garden image included in my blog post.
You can find the tutorial here:
http://www.takegreatpictures.com/Articles/Details/params/object/12679/default.aspx
Thanks again everyone!
Tim
User fees were instituted for health and education, and food subsidies were eliminated. ,