<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe is Listening!</title>
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for personal friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Story</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-35546</link>
		<author>Dave Story</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-35546</guid>
		<description>Adobe is definitely listening, and not just to Lightroom requests.  It's absolutely common for me to require my team members to spend 10-20% of their time out in the community.  Not just product managers, but software engineers and software quality engineers...everyone.  

I really don't understand why every software company doesn't do this.  It is harder, and it is definitely difficult not to be able to accomplish everything our customers want, but it's critical if we are going to meet our customers' needs.  

One thing I will say, is that it takes some thick skin to read all the criticisms of our "beloved babies" that we poured so much sweat and tears into...but in the end it is all worth it to see what our customers create (in part) using our tools.

I say this all the time -- Adobe has the best customers in the world!

Cheers,

Dave Story
VP Product Development
Creative Solutions, Adobe Systems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe is definitely listening, and not just to Lightroom requests.  It&#8217;s absolutely common for me to require my team members to spend 10-20% of their time out in the community.  Not just product managers, but software engineers and software quality engineers&#8230;everyone.  </p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t understand why every software company doesn&#8217;t do this.  It is harder, and it is definitely difficult not to be able to accomplish everything our customers want, but it&#8217;s critical if we are going to meet our customers&#8217; needs.  </p>
<p>One thing I will say, is that it takes some thick skin to read all the criticisms of our &#8220;beloved babies&#8221; that we poured so much sweat and tears into&#8230;but in the end it is all worth it to see what our customers create (in part) using our tools.</p>
<p>I say this all the time &#8212; Adobe has the best customers in the world!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Dave Story<br />
VP Product Development<br />
Creative Solutions, Adobe Systems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-32943</link>
		<author>Stephen</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-32943</guid>
		<description>One thing I would like to see in Lightroom is some type of virtual library.

I'm not even sure how this would technically work but I like to keep my photos in multiple librarys to keep it fairly easy to manage. I originally tried to keep all of my photos in a single library but that turned out to be slow.

I have this rough idea of when I want to, being able to open "this virtual library" where I could simultaneously open as many individual librarys at once.

This could keep my regular librarys small for when I want to organize, keyword, develop, etc but also allow me to search across all my photos when I'm looking for something that may not be specific to a library (shoot, trip, etc) and I'm not sure which library it may be in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I would like to see in Lightroom is some type of virtual library.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not even sure how this would technically work but I like to keep my photos in multiple librarys to keep it fairly easy to manage. I originally tried to keep all of my photos in a single library but that turned out to be slow.</p>
<p>I have this rough idea of when I want to, being able to open &#8220;this virtual library&#8221; where I could simultaneously open as many individual librarys at once.</p>
<p>This could keep my regular librarys small for when I want to organize, keyword, develop, etc but also allow me to search across all my photos when I&#8217;m looking for something that may not be specific to a library (shoot, trip, etc) and I&#8217;m not sure which library it may be in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed O'Keeffe</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-31973</link>
		<author>Ed O'Keeffe</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-31973</guid>
		<description>Can Adobe also listen to the fact that my Lightroom is only importing half the pictures on my memory card before ejecting it and saying it did them all. It has done this for the last 5 times, running the latest version in Mac OS 10.5 using SanDisk Extreme III SD cards. 

I am having to copy the data to the desktop and re-import every time and it is extremely annoying and time consuming *Sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Adobe also listen to the fact that my Lightroom is only importing half the pictures on my memory card before ejecting it and saying it did them all. It has done this for the last 5 times, running the latest version in Mac OS 10.5 using SanDisk Extreme III SD cards. </p>
<p>I am having to copy the data to the desktop and re-import every time and it is extremely annoying and time consuming *Sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30678</link>
		<author>Sean</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30678</guid>
		<description>Cool to hear! But, think about, if they (or any company) didn't listen to their customers, how do they expect to make more money by NOT giving them what they want? 

Now.....when will Photoshop and video editing software merge? ;) *hint hint*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool to hear! But, think about, if they (or any company) didn&#8217;t listen to their customers, how do they expect to make more money by NOT giving them what they want? </p>
<p>Now&#8230;..when will Photoshop and video editing software merge? <img src='http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> *hint hint*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed O'Keeffe</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30643</link>
		<author>Ed O'Keeffe</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30643</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the good news Scott, this makes me happy inside :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the good news Scott, this makes me happy inside <img src='http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30632</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30632</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

Unlike cell phone providers, it is nice to see companies like Adobe &#38; NAPP actually take customer suggestions seriously.  

Keep up the good work on all you do.  You &#38; NAPP make the world a much better place.

THANK YOU!!!

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>Unlike cell phone providers, it is nice to see companies like Adobe &amp; NAPP actually take customer suggestions seriously.  </p>
<p>Keep up the good work on all you do.  You &amp; NAPP make the world a much better place.</p>
<p>THANK YOU!!!</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Bernskiold</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30621</link>
		<author>Erik Bernskiold</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30621</guid>
		<description>Scott, you should check out the thread started in the LR section of the NAPP forums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, you should check out the thread started in the LR section of the NAPP forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Brodzinski</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30609</link>
		<author>Cory Brodzinski</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30609</guid>
		<description>its not related to this post, but checkout www.photacute.com, I'd be interested in hearing you're take on it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its not related to this post, but checkout <a href="http://www.photacute.com," rel="nofollow">www.photacute.com,</a> I&#8217;d be interested in hearing you&#8217;re take on it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30602</link>
		<author>Tim</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30602</guid>
		<description>Here's one more suggestion from a question posted at the LR Forum at NAPP.  During the download process you can check the option to create a backup file of the images.  LR is hardwired to automatically name the folder by date.  There is no option to change that.  Instead, it should have the same behavior as Exporting images does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one more suggestion from a question posted at the LR Forum at NAPP.  During the download process you can check the option to create a backup file of the images.  LR is hardwired to automatically name the folder by date.  There is no option to change that.  Instead, it should have the same behavior as Exporting images does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30588</link>
		<author>Jason</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30588</guid>
		<description>I had a feeling that posting might serve as a useful conduit to Adobe for some ideas on LR features.  Cruising through the 7 points Scott - even put a before/after up on my NAPP portfolio page if you got a minute to check it out...(gotta be a NAPP member to know the reasons, eh? :) )

PSUTV interviews seemed rather short this week.  Would like to have heard more from them, but I guess time was a limiting factor.  Looking forward to Digital Photography 2.0 as well.  I have no idea how you produce such a prodigious volume of written material so consistently!  Keep up the great work though!

Regards,

Jason Anderson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a feeling that posting might serve as a useful conduit to Adobe for some ideas on LR features.  Cruising through the 7 points Scott - even put a before/after up on my NAPP portfolio page if you got a minute to check it out&#8230;(gotta be a NAPP member to know the reasons, eh? <img src='http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>PSUTV interviews seemed rather short this week.  Would like to have heard more from them, but I guess time was a limiting factor.  Looking forward to Digital Photography 2.0 as well.  I have no idea how you produce such a prodigious volume of written material so consistently!  Keep up the great work though!</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Jason Anderson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30584</link>
		<author>keith</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30584</guid>
		<description>Yes, John Nack mentioned on his blog something about there's a Lightroom community in the works.  And he had some interesting things to say about program development. http://blogs.adobe.com/

And your to-do list is posted there too. 

"New Lightroom community help system On behalf of Anita and the rest of the Adobe Documentation team, I’m pleased to announce the new Lightroom community help system..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, John Nack mentioned on his blog something about there&#8217;s a Lightroom community in the works.  And he had some interesting things to say about program development. <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.adobe.com/</a></p>
<p>And your to-do list is posted there too. </p>
<p>&#8220;New Lightroom community help system On behalf of Anita and the rest of the Adobe Documentation team, I’m pleased to announce the new Lightroom community help system&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30582</link>
		<author>Eric</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/937#comment-30582</guid>
		<description>Now if Nikon would only do the same with NX and it's products. Come to think of it, what about Aperture 2.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if Nikon would only do the same with NX and it&#8217;s products. Come to think of it, what about Aperture 2.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
