<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Just Saw the Next Version of Lightroom, and&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941</link>
	<description>Scoops, tips and comments published exclusively for friends of Scott Kelby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:07:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lightroom&#8217;s Future : Lightroom Secrets</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-127210</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightroom&#8217;s Future : Lightroom Secrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-127210</guid>
		<description>[...] can read Scott&#8217;s full post here .      January 23, 2008 &#183; Posted in Lightroom, News &#160;  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can read Scott&#8217;s full post here .      January 23, 2008 &middot; Posted in Lightroom, News &nbsp;  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Crumley</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-41660</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crumley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-41660</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Thanks for the upcoming LR summary. V1.4 came out today and isn&#039;t the one we were looking for. It&#039;s always nice to have little things fixed, but I&#039;m personally anxious for the next BIG one.

I didn&#039;t see the most needed of all improvements in your summary. Did you accidentally omit an improved Search function? A Boolean search? Away from the panel and fixed fields and real database quick search and display? Like any of the on-line stock house searches. It doesn&#039;t do a lot of good to keyword without a really good search engine.

Nevertheless, I have 135,000 keyworded image files in LR waiting for the search engine. Please tell us it&#039;s coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Thanks for the upcoming LR summary. V1.4 came out today and isn&#8217;t the one we were looking for. It&#8217;s always nice to have little things fixed, but I&#8217;m personally anxious for the next BIG one.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see the most needed of all improvements in your summary. Did you accidentally omit an improved Search function? A Boolean search? Away from the panel and fixed fields and real database quick search and display? Like any of the on-line stock house searches. It doesn&#8217;t do a lot of good to keyword without a really good search engine.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I have 135,000 keyworded image files in LR waiting for the search engine. Please tell us it&#8217;s coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RÃ©flexions Photographiques &#187; Les yeux braquÃ©s sur Lightroom</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-40551</link>
		<dc:creator>RÃ©flexions Photographiques &#187; Les yeux braquÃ©s sur Lightroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-40551</guid>
		<description>[...] Kelby a eu la chance de jeter un coup d&#8217;Å“il Ã  la prochaine version de Lightroom et visiblement, il trÃ©pigne d&#8217;impatience de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kelby a eu la chance de jeter un coup d&#8217;Å“il Ã  la prochaine version de Lightroom et visiblement, il trÃ©pigne d&#8217;impatience de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utiliser Lightroom &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lightroom : bientÃ´t du nouveau ?</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-39428</link>
		<dc:creator>Utiliser Lightroom &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lightroom : bientÃ´t du nouveau ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-39428</guid>
		<description>[...] Kelby avait Ã©galement publiÃ© un billet enthousiaste sur la prochaine version de Lightroom qu&#8217;il a eu le privilÃ¨ge de voir en passant chez [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kelby avait Ã©galement publiÃ© un billet enthousiaste sur la prochaine version de Lightroom qu&#8217;il a eu le privilÃ¨ge de voir en passant chez [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Buse</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-38444</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Buse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-38444</guid>
		<description>Hello Scott... i am from Brazil and im your fan... 
i like this photo, you can send me in a good resolution?

rafaelbu@terra.com.br
tks..

Rafael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Scott&#8230; i am from Brazil and im your fan&#8230;<br />
i like this photo, you can send me in a good resolution?</p>
<p><a href="mailto:rafaelbu@terra.com.br">rafaelbu@terra.com.br</a><br />
tks..</p>
<p>Rafael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rune</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-37754</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-37754</guid>
		<description>scott, u can tell me(!) i wont say anything!!! promise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scott, u can tell me(!) i wont say anything!!! promise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bye bye Aperture&#160;2 &#124; Pushing Pixels</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-35977</link>
		<dc:creator>Bye bye Aperture&#160;2 &#124; Pushing Pixels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-35977</guid>
		<description>[...] without it&#8217;s flaws. Thankfully there seems to be some major changes in the next version. This post on Photoshop Insider really made me believe that they&#8217;re doing anything they can to make it an application in par [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] without it&#8217;s flaws. Thankfully there seems to be some major changes in the next version. This post on Photoshop Insider really made me believe that they&#8217;re doing anything they can to make it an application in par [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-35604</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-35604</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a chance to play around with Aperture 2.0 and wanted to leave the same message I posted on MacNN.com as to why I still like Lightroom better than Aperture.

Man, I really wanted Aperture to succeed. I really wanted to use Aperture over Lightroom. I really wanted to be able to switch back with Aperture 2.0 but Apple&#039;s dropped the ball a second time. 

It&#039;s still flaky in areas for speed on a Powerbook G4 (the loupe and compounding adjustments.)I&#039;ll bet they didn&#039;t fix the problem with Aperture becoming more sluggish the more images you load into a project. 

For all the slickness on the surface Aperture is missing things that I can do so much faster in Lightroom. 

Lightroom may seem like a toy to some but I&#039;m sorry, Aperture still sucks big in places that are so much more streamlined in Lightroom. Lightroom does what it should do without the fluff. Aperture looks polished but it&#039;s an Edsel. 

Complants: 

Still have to open adjustments for each image such as sharpen that I use regularly. Still can&#039;t make a group preset that carries all of the adjustments. You have to create a preset for each adjustment. Can&#039;t sort images any way other than ratings. I like and use flagging separate from rating and enjoy further sorting with labels. Still have to Lift and Stamp adjustments and metadata to multiple images rather than just hit a button and sync them. And when you try to stamp adjustments it doesn&#039;t let you deselect crop from the list of adjustments. Not only is there still no curves tool but Lightroom&#039;s is way ahead with the target adjustment feature. 

I don&#039;t think Apple is going to worry about the feedback too much. If so I have to believe they would have fixed the above shortcomings already. Besides, by the time they would make improvements based on the feedback link they provide in the program I&#039;m already going to be well into a Lightroom upgrade cycle. 

Really Apple, you can&#039;t afford to take this kind of time to improve over Lightroom. All that and Lightroom even runs on a G3 plus it has a Windows version. Sadly, a lot of photographers use Windows. I also don&#039;t have to keep upgrading my Mac for Lightroom where Apple wants to tie its software to its hardware. I partially used the origial version of Aperture as an excuse to upgrade to a Powerbook G4. Now I have to upgrade my computer again to get the full speed benefit from this version? 

Meh, no thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a chance to play around with Aperture 2.0 and wanted to leave the same message I posted on MacNN.com as to why I still like Lightroom better than Aperture.</p>
<p>Man, I really wanted Aperture to succeed. I really wanted to use Aperture over Lightroom. I really wanted to be able to switch back with Aperture 2.0 but Apple&#8217;s dropped the ball a second time. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s still flaky in areas for speed on a Powerbook G4 (the loupe and compounding adjustments.)I&#8217;ll bet they didn&#8217;t fix the problem with Aperture becoming more sluggish the more images you load into a project. </p>
<p>For all the slickness on the surface Aperture is missing things that I can do so much faster in Lightroom. </p>
<p>Lightroom may seem like a toy to some but I&#8217;m sorry, Aperture still sucks big in places that are so much more streamlined in Lightroom. Lightroom does what it should do without the fluff. Aperture looks polished but it&#8217;s an Edsel. </p>
<p>Complants: </p>
<p>Still have to open adjustments for each image such as sharpen that I use regularly. Still can&#8217;t make a group preset that carries all of the adjustments. You have to create a preset for each adjustment. Can&#8217;t sort images any way other than ratings. I like and use flagging separate from rating and enjoy further sorting with labels. Still have to Lift and Stamp adjustments and metadata to multiple images rather than just hit a button and sync them. And when you try to stamp adjustments it doesn&#8217;t let you deselect crop from the list of adjustments. Not only is there still no curves tool but Lightroom&#8217;s is way ahead with the target adjustment feature. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Apple is going to worry about the feedback too much. If so I have to believe they would have fixed the above shortcomings already. Besides, by the time they would make improvements based on the feedback link they provide in the program I&#8217;m already going to be well into a Lightroom upgrade cycle. </p>
<p>Really Apple, you can&#8217;t afford to take this kind of time to improve over Lightroom. All that and Lightroom even runs on a G3 plus it has a Windows version. Sadly, a lot of photographers use Windows. I also don&#8217;t have to keep upgrading my Mac for Lightroom where Apple wants to tie its software to its hardware. I partially used the origial version of Aperture as an excuse to upgrade to a Powerbook G4. Now I have to upgrade my computer again to get the full speed benefit from this version? </p>
<p>Meh, no thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jose</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-33113</link>
		<dc:creator>jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 09:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-33113</guid>
		<description>As the other Spaniard, I encourage you to convince LR team to translate the program into Spanish. I have no problem but the market would open for Adobe  it this happens. Think it over, Adobe !
Thanks for a gorgeous tool. I&#039;m sure it will be improved very much in the futurte 2.0 release</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the other Spaniard, I encourage you to convince LR team to translate the program into Spanish. I have no problem but the market would open for Adobe  it this happens. Think it over, Adobe !<br />
Thanks for a gorgeous tool. I&#8217;m sure it will be improved very much in the futurte 2.0 release</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indir</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-32916</link>
		<dc:creator>indir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-32916</guid>
		<description>I believe identifying you are under an NDA is a violation of the NDA. You might want to check on that and make corrections as required. And if true, you then might want to delete this post.

If Iâ€™m incorrect, then just ignore me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe identifying you are under an NDA is a violation of the NDA. You might want to check on that and make corrections as required. And if true, you then might want to delete this post.</p>
<p>If Iâ€™m incorrect, then just ignore me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next version of Lightroom &#171; Wouter photoblog &#124; Wouter Brandsma photography</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-31741</link>
		<dc:creator>Next version of Lightroom &#171; Wouter photoblog &#124; Wouter Brandsma photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-31741</guid>
		<description>[...] is that Adobe give its users the feeling that they are listening. Scott Kelby devoted an extra post about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is that Adobe give its users the feeling that they are listening. Scott Kelby devoted an extra post about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941/comment-page-1#comment-31425</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/941#comment-31425</guid>
		<description>Grrr.... Way to keep us hanging!   

We can&#039;t wait to see what they have in store for us next!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grrr&#8230;. Way to keep us hanging!   </p>
<p>We can&#8217;t wait to see what they have in store for us next!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
