10 Things I Would Tell New Lightroom Users
I got the idea for this post from an excellent post from Rob Sylvan (Rob is one of our Photoshop Help Desk gurus, as well as a Lightroom author and instructor), called “10 Things I Wish I Could Tell Every New Lightroom User.”
Rob’s article ran on Scott Bourne’s must-visit PhotoFocus.com site, and he had lots of really great tips for new users (here’s the direct link). I thought his idea was brillliant, and I sat down and started thinking about what I would tell new users, and then I thought I oughta do a similar post (with a different list of ten).
I was thinking of using a different name for mine, but then Rob wound up coming to to my Boston “Photoshop for Digital Photographers” seminar, and afterward he even gave me a ride to the airport. During that ride to the airport, although we didn’t talk about his post, I felt that somehow there was an implicit permission to run with his idea [
] so with apologies (and full credit) to Rob (and Scott Bourne), here’s my own list, called:.
10 Things I Would Tell New Lightroom Users:
(1) Use Solo Mode To Tame All Those Panels
New users can get really flustered by scrolling up and down the list of open panels in Lightroom, which is why you should turn on “Solo Mode.” That way, the only panel you’ll see is the one you’re working on (and the rest all automatically collapse). This not only saves time, but cuts the clutter big time, and makes it easier to focus on just what you’re working with. You turn this on by Ctrl-clicking (PC: Right-clicking) on the title of any panel and choose “Solo Mode” from the pop-up menu that appears.
(2) Use Collections instead of Folders
Folders are where the actual photos you imported from a particular shoot are stored. Your good photos from that shoot, bad photos—the whole ball of wax. But once we import photos, are most of us really care about are the good ones, and that’s why Collections were invented (well, it’s one of the reasons anyway). Matt and I always joke that “Folders are where we go when we want to see the shots that weren’t any good” because we put all our “keepers” in a collection right away. Collections are safe, and will keep most users out of trouble.
(3) Store all your photos inside one main folder
You can have as many sub-folders inside that one main folder as you want, but if you want to have peace, calm, and order in your Lightroom, the key is not to import photos from all over your computer. Choose one main folder (like your Pictures folder on a Mac, or your My Pictures folder on a Windows PC), and put all your photos inside that folder. THEN import them into Lightroom (and if you’re importing from a memory card, have those images copied from the card info a folder within your main folder). Plus, this makes backing up your image library a breeze. Every time I run into someone who’s Lightroom life is a mess, it’s because they didn’t follow this one simple rule. Also, if you’re working on a laptop, it’s totally fine to store your photos on an external drive, rather than on your laptop.
(4) Do as much work in Lightroom as possible
I now do about 80% of my work in Lightroom in itself, and I only go over to Photoshop in case of an emergency, or to do something that Lightroom just can’t do (like collaging images with layers, or creating professional level type, or using the pen tool, applying certain filters, etc.).. You can do an amazing amount of your everyday work within Lightroom’s Develop Module (especially since the addition of the Adjustment Brush and Gradient Filter). So, take the time to learn these tools, and you will speed your workflow (and simplify your life) in ways you can’t imagine, by staying in Lightroom as much as possible.
(5) Create Presets and Templates whenever possible
The key to working efficiently in Lightroom is to make Presets and Templates for the things you do every day (even though a lot of users never take the few seconds it takes to create even one). If you find yourself making a particular edit more than just a couple of times; make a Develop Module preset for it, so it’s always just one click away. Have a printing set-up you use pretty often? Save it as a template. Once you start making presets and templates, your efficiency will go through the roof. Unless you’re charging by the hour, this is how to up your ROI big time!
(6) How to Save Your Image as a JPEG
Matt reminded me about this one and it’s a good one, because I get asked this question again and again at my Lightroom seminars. It’s because it’s not totally obvious how to do it, because there is no “Save As” or even just “Save” command under the File Menu (like almost every other app on earth). If you do go under the File menu, you’ll find four different Export commands, but none of them say “Export as JPEG” so again—it’s not real obvious. However, you can just choose the one called “Export,” when the dialog appears, you’ll have the Option to save your selected image (or images) as a JPEG.
(7) Turn off Auto Show for panels
I get more emails from new Lightroom users asking if there’s a way to turn off this “feature” than you can stick a shake at. I have users literally begging me; “Please tell me there’s a way to stop the panels from popping in and out on me all day long!” Thankfully, there is; Ctrl-click (PC: Right-click) on the little arrows on the center edge of each panel. A pop-up menu will appear—-just choose “Manual” and now the panels will only open when you click on that little arrow (or if you press the F-key keyboard shortcuts [F5 to show/hide the top navigation panel. F6 for the filmstrip at the bottom. F7 for the left side panels, and F8 for the right side panels], or if you press the Tab key it will hide all the panels).
(8) Throw away your old backups
If you back-up your catalogs on a regular basis (once a day, or weekly) before long you’re going to have a whole bunch of back-ups stored on your computer. After a while, if you’ve got a lot of photos, those old outdated back-ups are going to start eating up a lot of space on your hard disc, so go to your backups folder and delete the ones that are more than a couple of weeks old. After all, if your catalog got messed up, would you want to go back months in time, or last week? Right—those old ones are pretty much useless.

(9) It’s OK to have multiple Catalogs
You don’t have to keep everything in just one catalog—-you can create as many catalogs as you want (and you might want to create multiple catalogs if you’re going to have more than 40,000 or 50,000 images in one catalog). For example, I have separate catalogs for portraits, for family photos, for travel photos, for sports photos, for weddings, and so on. I know a wedding photographer that creates a brand new fresh catalog for every wedding he shoots. He likes the speed and cleanliness of of a fresh catalog with nothing it in but the photos from that one particular wedding. Creating a new fresh, empty catalog is easy—just go under the File menu and choose New Catalog (don’t worry—it doesn’t erase your old catalog—it just saves and closes it). To open one of your previously open catalogs, just go under Lightroom’s File menu and choose Open Recent.
(10) Ask yourself whether you need lots of keywords or not
We were all originally taught to invest a reasonable amount of time adding global and specific keywords (search terms) to all the photos we import. If you’re selling stock photography, this is an absolute must, and if you have a client base that might call you up and ask, “Send me all your photos of red car, and they need to all be in vertical orientation, and I only need one’s where you can see the driver, and the driver has to be female” then you’ll want to keyword like a pro. However, if you’re just keeping track of the photos from your vacation to Paris last year, you might not need to go through all your photos and assign keywords. Ask yourself this question: When was the last time I couldn’t find the photos I need by just going to my Collections panel? If you’re not having problems getting your hands on the photos you need in just seconds, you might be able to skip all the keywording stuff. I’m not telling you not to keyword—I’m just asking you to consider whether you need to add a bunch of keywords or not, because most users probably don’t need many (or any). [Code: IAARRWTAW]
So there ya have it—-the 10 Things I would Tell new Lightroom Users. Thanks again to Rob Sylvan for the original idea (and to Scott Bourne for publishing Rob’s original post), and I hope those 10 ideas (along with Rob’s) help to make your Lightroom life easier.
























Sweet, the manual panel mode was worth the read! I always HATED those darn things popping out all the time. Its kind of like boxing with lightroom!
You forgot “There is no soft proofing feature.”
I only stumbled across this yesterday when I tried to load a print profile for my local photo lab.
Not a problem if you have 5 or 10 photos to print as you can via Photoshop… a serious issue when you have over 2000 photos that need printing as is my case.
At the moment I am seriously considering if I will use Lightroom again for bigger jobs…
… what’s more, Lightroom 3 Beta doesn’t seem have this feature either. Pretty bad if you ask me.
I didn’t forget it.
-Scott
Tom: Quick question and really just trying to play devil’s advocate here. How are you currently soft-proofing 2000 photos? You can’t be using Photoshop or that would take forever. And I guess the next question is, with 2000 photos are you really modifying all 2000 of them if you realize something is off in the soft proof process? I mean with printer profiles the way they are today and color modes (in Photoshop and Lightroom) pretty standard, is soft proofing really a deal breaker.
I already know I’m gonna take a bunch of heat from color-geeks out there (ARod?), but I don’t soft proof. I’ve calibrated, use ICC profiles, and keep my color profiles in LR and PS consistent and I get great results.
Just wondering your take on it.
Thanks.
>(ARod?)
You must know Eddie Murphy from Epson…
Don, where soft proofing is useful is when you wish to view the print in a viewing booth next to the display and get a close match. The simulate paper white and ink black are necessary here to provide a dynamic range simulation. The display has a far wider range (blacker blacks, whiter whites) than any print. You’d be hard press to find any print that exceeds 350:1 and we’re working with displays that are in the 800:1+ range. That’s a big disconnect. So if you first soft proof, you have the ability to add some minor tweaks to the document in this simulation as you view a duplicate with the soft proof off. A little tweak with curves, a little tweak with Hue/Sat, you can get a much closer match.
If all 2000 images were very similar, you’d only soft proof one, build a set of adjustment layers to get it to appear a bit closer to the original with soft proof off, then drag and drop that onto the other 1999 images. Yes, it would be slow, hence we really need this functionality in LR. I hope we get it.
oh one more… “create a new catalogue for every new project”
Thanks for the tip on turning the panels to manual mode! I didn’t know this option existed.
Thanks, Scott! I thought I knew Lightroom pretty wel, or actually really well. But throwing older backups away had not occured to me and just yielded me 20GB of HD space!
Three things I did NOT know in there – thanks Scott
Thanks Scott! Can you share more about Collections keeping me safe and just a bit about how you use them.
Thanks! Don’t know how I missed Solo mode before, definitely reduces clutter!
Here’s a couple more related tips. You can also enable/disable Solo mode by Alt/Option clicking the panel label directly. You’ll see the arrow change from a solid fill (not solo) to dot fill (solo).
You can quickly close all panels by Ctrl/CMD clicking any open panel label or quickly open all panels by Ctrl/CMD clicking any closed panel label.
Don’t forget this works on the Export dialog too!
These shortcuts did not work in my Lr 2.5????????????
Awesome list! Couldn’t have said it better.
Scott, great tip on getting rid of old backups. I picked up over 20gb of drive space. Thanks for the great tip.
Glad to say I’m onboard with just about the whole list. I don’t turn off autoshow for the panels as they don’t bother me. But after using Lightroom for 2 years I guess most of this stuff becomes necessary.
So, when you do the next Lightroom book (for #3) will you include the list? The Lightroom book was very useful to me when learning, and quick tips like this really make life easier on new users.
Thanks for these types of posts Scott. You do a great job helping folks new to Photoshop, Lightroom, etc!
Scott, love your LR tips and I didn’t have to go to Savannah to learn them. Thanks, you are the greatest wolf around.
“Your St Pete Buddy”
One of the big problems of following the (2) Use Collections instead of Folders
(3) Store all your photos inside one main folder is you put all your eggs in one proprietary DAM solution. That is, all that stuff is inside the catalog database. If you decide you want to use another DAM or if LR goes belly up, or whatever, the structure is gone forever. Using folders wisely allows you to always find your images outside the DAM or upgrade/update the DAM anytime you wish. For example, if you’re using LR 2 this way and want to use LR3 beta, well you can’t upgrade the data in the older catalog to the new beta. IF however you used a good folder structure, you could simply point LR3 beta to the hard drive with that structure, import from current location and you’re done. I’m not suggesting collections are not useful, they are incredibly powerful but can’t forward migrate in many cases, actual folders can and always will. Collections are then powerful for keeping track of images that reside in differing folders in the actual structure.
As I’ve discussed in my “Organizing Lightroom Strategies”, using well defined folder structure (and the awesome Folder Name naming token) makes it really easy to name and rename images inside of LR based on where they reside. If you move them from folder to folder now, in LR, updating the name is super easy.
I think the main idea of “store all photos inside one main folder” is that you can use whatever sub-folder structure naming convention that suits your needs, but by keeping that structure inside a single parent folder that is also imported into Lightroom it can make your Lightroom life easier should you need to migrate that structure to a different location (i.e. larger storage, external drive, new computer, etc.). It also means the structure you see in the Folders panel will mirror what you see on disk through the file browser of your choice. I do think that would work just fine with your system of using a well defined folder structure, no? Or am I misunderstanding your concern?
Yes Rob, I’d agree to keep everything in a main folder and then dividing that up into subfolders, where those folders are actually existing folders on the HD for the reasons outlined above. That’s exactly what I’m proposing. The idea I think isn’t so sound is dumping all images into one big folder, then relying on collections to organize them (or using fewer actual physical folders, like one that’s just 2009, 2008), then using collections to divide those folders up into collections instead of using actual sub folders. Collections are really useful now for dividing up content that spans multiple physical folders (all my best shots, images I need to print, etc). Again, if something goes south with your LR database or you decide to use a companion DAM, you don’t lose as much of the organizational structure because you’ve based the structure on something real. VCs, Collections etc are fragile due to their proprietary nature inside the LR database. LR users should be aware of this fragility.
Andrew:
In case you were wondering what “Code IAARRWTAW” which appears at the end of the post in light gray is about; it stands for:
I Await Andrew Rodney’s Reasons Why These Are Wrong.
-Scott
Wrong? Different stokes for different folks. Its useful for people to fully see the upside and downside to any particular method. Do you disagree that Collections are not fragile and don’t transport outside of LR very well?
Pretty touchy aren’t you?
Well, I don’t think Andrew is wrong, but then again he’s not right either. There needs to be a meta layer in most collections to make the most of them – and I think all of us need to be aware that we do need an exit strategy for our data. (though I suspect that LR will last longer then iView did after the MS takeover….)
Peter Krogh made most of these points in the first edition of his DAM book, and the reasons haven’t changed – even implementing them in lightroom – though I feel that his bucket strategy is difficult to implement in a lightroom workflow.
I can’t comment on “Organizing Lightroom Strategies” as I can’t find a web reference that describes this.
Gareth, I agree, there does need to be a metadata layer which is how I build all my smart collections instead of just dragging files into collections what can and will break in many situations. So if you enter the metadata you desire in any number of ways (keywords work really well but so do Captions and any other edible metadata field), then populate the smart collections by finding those keywords, instead of just dragging stuff into collections, you have data you can use outside of this one DAM and, if you upgrade from say 2.X to 3beta, you just rebuild the smart collections (not difficult) and off you go. So the idea of putting stuff into collections and not using keywords seems like a good way to hose things in the future if you move to another DAM or what we currently have to live with, no ability to upgrade from an older catalog structure to a new on.
>I can’t comment on “Organizing Lightroom Strategies” as I can’t find a web reference that describes this.
“Organizing Lightroom Strategies” was a class I did twice at Photoshop World (and once at PPE), its currently listed for Orlando but that page is not up to date, I will not be going to Orlando PSW so I’ll not be doing the session. And depending on the “Code IAARRWTAW”, its likely I’ll not be attending ever again! Who knows. I do know the two sessions were well attended and the evals were good.
One thing I say up front in this session is, everyone does things differently and the key to producing a good strategy for each users is to see how other people do things and cherry pick the ideas that work for you. I found Peter’s book invaluable in doing this and reading how others organize their images as well. Hence my comments about collections which didn’t fly very well here (since apparently there’s one way to do this). An example in Peter’s book you point out is Buckets which didn’t work for me either. I originally tried 50gig buckets of catalogs in LR only to find, looking for images got to be problematic (the issue with multiple catalogs is the one image you’re looking for is probably in that other catalog). So I stuck with the one big bucket approach which is working for me so far.
I think you and I, and Kenneth (below) agree that using metadata that always travels with the data instead of a proprietary DAM based organization structure may be a tad more work but really is “best practice”.
Great list!
One of my top items (probably in the top 20) is to tell people don’t be afraid to experiment in the develop module. Go crazy if you want!
you can always get back to your original if you wanted, and the original file isn’t really getting modified anyway until export or print. So go nuts and learn like crazy!
It’s so liberating when you know that you’re not destroying your actual photos.
-Mark
Hi Scott thanks for the tips. Between you and Rob I learned a great deal and there’s never any need for you to give me apologies (or full credit). If something happens at Photofocus you think will help here go for it. I am amazed at how much I’ve learned about Lightroom from both your blog, Kelby Training and NAPP. In just a few short months I’ve become competent. Still some catching up to do if I want to become expert
Scott, thank you so much for #10! After having stressed over my inadequate and inconsistent keywording since Lightroom’s release, I finally feel free to just give it up. (Insert sigh of relief here.)
Also, I absolutely love your 7-point system book. In #4 above you state, “I now do about 80% of my work in Lightroom.” Do you have any plans to re-write your 7-point system book to reflect your new workflow?
Thanks!
Thank you for adding to the PhotoFocus tips. I espescially appreciate the solo mode.
Levi
Scott, I love your 10 points of LR too! Thanks for sharing!
Manual panel mode???? You just made my day. Great tips, I’ll use all of them.
Scott: you got me worried in tip #9 when you said “you might want to create multiple catalogs if you’re going to have more than 40,000 or 50,000 images in one catalog”. The way I work I need to refer back to pictures I took years ago. 50,000 images is about 1 years work for me.
My vision is to have one Lightroom catalog for every “keeper” picture I have ever taken or will take. I am thinking in terms of upwards of 600,000 pictures in a catalog. That’s assuming I have enough disk space and processing power.
I want to be able to archive them but still be able to search on metadata and view small thumbnails. Then LR will prompt me to load the correct DVD if I need the full sized image.
That’s my vision of a “professional” product.
We have the database technology and processor power. Terabyte drives are common. So I do not see a technology hurdle.
I am praying that Adobe will enhance Lightroom’s scalability faster than I can fill its catalogs.
Am I alone in having this view?
Ian,
Wow, that’s a lot of images! I always thought the word “keeper” implied that the rest are not kept. ; )
Daniel
Yes, it does sound a lot. But the kind of photography I do isn’t exactly what you’d call exhibition quality or fine art. Smile. For example I have thousands of pictures of cars, trucks, buses, ships and airplanes from around the world.
I want to be able to find out quickly if I have photographed this plane before and find the photo.
See http://bkkphotographer.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/why-i-want-all-my-pictures-in-one-lightroom-catalog/ for more details.
Is there any way to assign a keyboard shortcut to a preset? Would that be sweet, to just tap a key rather than having to search through the list. It’d be nice to see in LR3. Thanks for the tips!
That’s why I love this blog. All useful information … All the time. Being an IT backup guy in my day job I was wondering about all those backup files. When can I delete them? Now I know. I’m taking Scott’s class in Tampa next week and I was gonna ask anyway.
Thanks for the list from you Scott K. and Rob/Scott B. very helpful and also, good to read that I’m doing most of them. But, as mention before, that Backup was very helpful for me too.
I like your naming of your Presets!!
in re catalogs, how do you structure the directories on the drive? one root directory shared between all the catalogs with 2009/10 25 09/*.cr2 etc under the same root or a separate root per catalog, e.g. cat1/2009/10 25 09/*.cr2, cat2/2009/10 25 09/*.cr2 … etc? if using the second style do you make all those cat1, cat2,… subdirectories of a single master root directory or use some other scheme?
Scott great list of tips. I have a question being that you are the lightroom guru I am currently an Aperture user and have been since it came out before there was lightroom and only played briefly with the original beta. Are there any great benefits I would see by switching to lightroom I only ask as allot of your tips for lightroom seem to be the way Aperture functions by default as far as storing all images in one main location and using collections ie smart folders and Apertures vaults do backups without multiple copies. I am not trying to start a flaming war I am genuinely interested in your opinon of if it is worth the move as I am always looking for ways to improve my work flow.
Scott, since you metioned presets in #5, it only seems fair that you share at least a few of the ones you use… don’t you think? I know we can already get tons of great ones from Matt (lightroomkillertips.com), but it’d be awesome to see/get some of yours as well. Maybe you could do a “Top 10 Presets” post. You could even do a short “Speeding Up Your Workflow” series, include develop presets, print templates, web templates, actions in PS, brush presets, maybe even workspaces… anyway, just an idea.
>>SK Top 10 Presets<>Speeding up your Workflow<<
not just an idea, a really good idea!
Scott,
Great information for a newbie to Lightroom!
Ken
PS – Told you last Monday the Bucs were going to beat Green Bay!!!! GO BUCS!
The “solo mode” tip was the first new thing I implemented when I returned from PSW. Great tips!
Thank you! I am new to Lightroom and found your post during a full blown, F-Bomb temper tantrum regarding catalogs/folders/collections/files/portfolios/volumes. Seriously, can’t it be simpler? And there you have it, #2, “just use collections instead of folders”. I think I will be okay now. Thanks again.
Ahh! Just in time! I just installed Lightroom late last week and am trying to get oriented.
Great and timely tips for me, as I’m in the process of learning Lightroom. I’m moving from Aperture after two plus years, and I’m using _Lightroom 2 for Digital Photographers_ and Matt’s _Lightroom 2 In Depth_ video courses to get me up to speed.
I’m not sold on the idea of manually adding things to collections, though. For my workflow, if I add the appropriate keywords and ratings to all my photos, I don’t _need_ to create manual collections. I can do everthing I need with smart collections. It’s a personal thing I guess. I don’t create manual playlists in iTunes either; I always use smart playlists. My philosophy is that if I have all the right metadata associated with the file, I can always create or rebuild a smart collection.
I’m just not sold on manual collections, but I’m always willing to change my mind in light of new information.
>My philosophy is that if I have all the right metadata associated with the file, I can always create or rebuild a smart collection.
I think that makes a enormous amount of sense. The metadata that’s always with the originals (or outside a proprietary database) can in most cases, be used or accessed with other DAMs or other organizing methods that are not proprietary.
I love this post, Scott. Love Lightroom.
Thanks for #7 – that has been driving me nuts…
So is there a ruler option in Lightroom?
On a PC,CTRL+/ shows you the valid shortcuts in each module.
There are rulers in the Print module and CTRL+R shows/removes them.
In the Develop module, the panel with the Crop tool in it has an option where you can give 2 points and it will adjust your crop by that angle…
Maybe not what you were asking for – but useful tidbits just the same.
Thanks I will check that out.
Hey Scott,
great stuff. Do you know if there is a smart way to move images from one catalog to another? I’, copying and reaorganizing from time to time and it looks like there is no easy way to move.
Thanks
Patrick
>Do you know if there is a smart way to move images from one catalog to another?
Select the images, File>Export to Catalog. Then open other catalog, Import to Catalog. That will carry over all the proprietary stuff embedded in the original catalog to the newer catalog with the images. Look at the options at the bottom of the original Export to Catalog dialog (check boxes) to control previews, and actual export of the “negatives” if you want to move them across a drive.
I am missing one critical piece of information that is preventing me from using Lightroom…and I would really like to use it: I have 4 TB of images spread across three 1.5TB hard drives on my MacPro, plus a full backup on a Drobo with 6TB of storage. I get that the key to making Lightroom work is “to put everything in one folder” but how do I accomplish that when my file folders are spread among three drives? My practice is to keep my most recent image folders on one “active” drive and then over time move them to the other two “archive” drives.
Thank you so much! I’m new to LR and the solo panel tip and manual panel hide tip were so helpful!
>>I get that the key to making Lightroom work is “to put everything in one folder” but how do I accomplish that when my file folders are spread among three drives?
You CAN do it that way, the piece above is recommending you don’t to keep things simple for newer users. Lightroom can access the data from three drives assuming they are all on line. You’ll see three hard drives listed in the “Folders” panel in Library and each subfolder will be visible and accessible. The downside is you need all three drives up and running and, backing up is more complicated (you’ll need something to sync all three drives to three other backup locations). But you absolutely can work in LR as you describe if the complexity issues don’t present a problem for you. Or you could make three catalogs, the only downside to multiple catalogs is that, the image you’re looking for is often in another catalog.
Thanks for the tips.
Using Collections as opposed to Folders what would be your workflow on importing?
Do you import straight into a Collection?
Ok this may seem completely unrelated to LR, except that it will determine whether I purchase LR or not
Is there a way to create style presets in Photoshop Elements?
Thanks!
Wow, thanks for this posting and the links. I’m brand new to LR and CS4.
I see that just as I’ve purchased and started to learn LR2 that there is now a beta version of the NEXT Lightroom (3)! Since I’m brand new to LR, should I focus on version 2 or start learning version 3???
I would really appreciate your guidance!
Cheers
Tim
Start with 2.0. The beta is not only a bit rough around the edges, if you do a lot of work there, there’s no guarantee it will migrate to the final release and I’d hate to see you lose a lot of stuff that can’t be transferred forward. With 2.0, all that will eventually upgrade to the newer 3.0 catalog structure once that version ships.
Wow, thanks for such a great post! I just downloaded LR 3 Beta, and it’s been my first Lightroom experience, so this is a lot of help!
Thanks for all your great tips, Scott!
Help! Deleted some old backups and presto all the catalogs gone. Fortunately able to restore from Time Machine. Any chance of a short tutorial on how to delete old backups without losing all your data.
Your working catalog is not in anyway connected to the backups. It sounds like you accidentally deleted your working catalog. I would suggest making sure that your catalog backups are stored on a different drive than your working catalog for 2 reasons, 1) in case of disk failure you want your backup copies on a different drive, 2) reduce confusion factor so you know which is which. You may find this helpful:
http://lightroomers.com/tutorial-back-up-your-catalog/612/
Hi Scott.
Great tips for new lightroom users.. I think you should mention the keyboard command for easier export: ctrl+shift+E
Saves me alot of time. I also always put the finished photos in an “edited” folder in the original folder.
Could you explain to me why luminence noise reduction is disabled in LR 3 beta?
Would it be advisable if I have one catalog for each shoot? That’s what I do now, but I’m not sure if that’s the efficient way of doing things. I agree that I would not be able to group similar kinda shots together. How do I combine these catalogs then and make them into folders instead.
Okay, I’m brandy new user and this is a little off subject. I’m an old pc guy (operative word “old”) and just bought a MacBookPro and Lightroom 2 so I can optimize (play with) the images from my new D300. I also have Scott Kelby’s Lightroom book. I’ve managed to import images from several shoots and I’ve been reading the book but I have been looking for a “quick start” guide to take me though sorting, basic developing and then exporting for printing. Any suggestions please.
Haha I like your “make it look better!” preset.
Any chance you’d be willing to share what that one does?
I have just bought LR 2.4. I found out real quick that it is very different from most programs on what you call call things and the war you get around in it. These 10 tips will help me a lot.
Thank you very much for providing them.
Ron Atchley
Regarding item #9 “It’s OK to have multiple Catalogs”….
I would think that having multiple catalogs would be an action of last resort, since Lightroom 2.x limits your searches to a single catalog.
BTW, I have over 150,000 images in a single catalog and I have no performance issues. The PC is running 64 bit Windows 7 with 4 Mb of RAM.