Apple’s iPad and Apple’s Secret Weapon
Like everybody else in the world, I was tuned in to Steve Job’s launch of the Apple iPad yesterday, and I have to tell you—I am incredibly impressed. My wife saw the video yesterday afternoon on Apple’s Website, and totally unsolicited she sent me a text that read “I want an iPad!!!!!!!!!!” (My wife so does not get geeked out by gadgets, so this is bigger than it sounds).
However, as expected within just a few hours of the announcement, some blog sites were already picking it apart, pointing out which features it doesn’t have, and what it was missing, and why it’s going to be a failure, and so on. Just like they did with the iPhone.
People were coming out of the woodwork to tell you all the features the original iPhone was missing, like no copy and paste, short battery life, no physical keyboard, no voice command, it’s geared only for consumers so no business users would consider it, it’s too expensive—there are lots of cheaper alternatives, and so on.
Of course, everything they said was missing from the iPhone was true, and you could buy phones all day long that were cheaper, had physical keyboards, longer battery life, voice control, and so on. But the iPhone didn’t become a success because of what it does. It because a success because of how it does it. People who only look at feature lists always, always, miss this. It’s not about features, or the iPhone would never have made it.
Matthew Lynn, a Bloomberg news columnist, said in a article shortly after the original iPhone’s introduction:
“Apple will sell a few to its fans, but the iPhone won’t make a long-term mark on the industry.”
He’s a feature counter, and he has lots of company. You’re hearing from a lot of them today.
They may as well comes to grips with it—-the iPad is going to be huge. Game changing huge! I haven’t personally talked with a single person yet who said they don’t want one. But that’s not why it’s going to be huge.
It’s going to be huge for a phenomenon that I’ve seen happen again and again, year after year. When Apple comes out with a new product, it always looks pretty cool when you see it in their TV ads, and on the Web, but when you actually see the product in person at the Apple store, and you get your hands on it—you fall in love with it. Apple stuff just looks incredibly cool in person. It’s Apple’s secret weapon.
And if last quarter was any indicator, when the iPad ships, nearly 50 million (that’s right—-million) people will see an iPad in person at their local Apple Store in the first 90 days after it launches. Yup. This going to be huge!
By the way; if you think it should have had a built-in chat camera, or a phone, or run multiple applications, or have notifications, or cost less, or any thing that kept it from being as great as you thought it should be, don’t buy it. It’s that simple.
For a detailed first take on the iPad, visit Terry White’s Tech Blog (link). When it comes to Apple, Terry is absolutely one of the most insightful people in the entire industry, so it’s always great to hear his take on it.
Anyway, I can’t wait to get mine (and apparently, I’d better pick up one for my wife, too).



















The Ipad looks great. What really sucks is the fact that ebooks and prbably other contents too is not avilaible in my home country (almost only available in the US). We have had the same situation for a long time not being able to by TV series etc on Itunes. No wonder Apple Norway sell zero Apple TV’s.
At the same time I can buy a Kindle and get instant access to 350.000 books immidiately.
Why does Apple show so little interest in markets outside the US?
My first thought about the iPad: what a great portfolio tool…imagine whipping one of these cool gadgets out for a client and flicking through your best photos, all glowing in backlit LED glory…
The best description I’ve seen thus far. From developer Daniel Jalkut:
“it’s the stepping off point towards what we can’t even yet imagine”
Cheers
i cant wait to get one!!
Easily your most petty post ever. Too bad. I could easily change the worst paragraph to:
By the way; if you DON’T think it should have had a built-in chat camera, or a phone, or run multiple applications, or have notifications, or cost less, or any thing that kept it from being as great as you thought it should be, buy it. It’s that simple.
Bottom line is springing the apple v. the world debate here doesn’t help me take better photographs, nor is it the reason I tune in daily.
Cheers,
Todd
Ditto (insert smiley face here)
Todd, you use this site to learn how to take better photographs? This is Scott’s blog, were he can talk about anything he wants. He has other sites were you can better learn photography. I get the feeling that you’re just not an Apple fan who doesn’t like that others enjoy their products.
Joseph,
Thank you. I am aware this is Scott’s blog…ostensibly to talk about photoshop and photography. I am not disputing his right to talk about whatever strikes his fancy, but he is one that is always above the petty apple v. the world fray that permeates so many other blogs. I would say the same thing if he made a similiar post in the equally rediculous Nikon v Canon argument.
Todd:
I didn’t mention any other product. I didn’t mention Mac vs. anything. I just said I thought it was going to sell a lot, and I was going to get one.
How is that petty? I think just the mere fact that I mentioned Apple at all made it petty to you. By the way, how are you enjoying that MacBook Pro or yours?
Now, this reply. This. That was petty.
(Just having fun—don’t read anything more into this).
-Scott
Scott:
Good to see you missed the point entirely. For the most part, I had no issue with the post, in fact your youthful exhuberance made me laugh. The “petty” part was this – which I alluded to in my reply –
“By the way; if you think it should have had a built-in chat camera, or a phone, or run multiple applications, or have notifications, or cost less, or any thing that kept it from being as great as you thought it should be, don’t buy it. It’s that simple.”
This does nothing more than inflame the whole inane Apple v the world argument that, quite frankly, I’m tired of, which you are too judging by your follow up Q&A – if your sincerity is to be believed.
I don’t have a Mac pro…no money to burn, however, Bruce Springsteen is kicking it ion my iPod Classic 80Gb!
Cheers,
Todd
Actually the thing that was left out of the presentation but is discussed online, is their little dongle that allows you to attach a camera. Roll the calendar forward 12 months and you’ll see every photo studio in the country with one of these devices. We’ll all be using them to shoot tethered, edit on the fly, and sent rough shots straight to the client. It will revolutionize the studio.
Add some form of document sharing / control, and the camera guy will control the shot from the ipad, make rough notes on how they want it processed, and have the file transferred wirelessly to the PS backroom where the eager technicians will make the edits.
If I had spare cash, I’d fund this business. The iPad and photographers are about to be inseparable.
That might have been true if they had added some kind of pen capability. Hell, you can’t even use a mouse. I don’t know about you, but I can’t do fine work with a pointing device that is only accurate to within 113 pixels. Oh, and by the way, none of the software you would use to do that, including the software that allows you to tether, can be run on this device. BTW, it’s based on the ipod OS, which meas that you can’t name pictures or organize them or batch delete them without hooking it into a real computer.
And also, it doesn’t have a USB port. Where exactly were you planning on plugging that camera in?
Though the iPad is introduced as a product, it’s actually a working “prototype”. Apple’s product roadmap for the iPad is several revs away. Throwing in this iPad version is part of the process to test it (while earning revenue from it). It’s a revision product also aimed at “hooking” early adopters into throwing in their opinions about it. This way, the feedback becomes an input to the requirements of the next version before it gets released. In fact, the sleek look and feel of the iPad (and it’s mobility) all came from the Mac Air and the iPhone. So if this version’s features disappoints, wait for the next rev and it will surely be closer to what pundits and naysayers expect it to be…cheers!
Hi Scott, i think I-pad will be a very good product for show our photos in a professional way!! Imagine your photos on this screen you can transport it wherever you want!
Too bad you can’t organize them unless you take it back to your computer.
Great concept but not enough there to get me excited.. yet. If this had wacomesqe pen for retouching photos, an sd card reader for swapping photos/storing media and a more modified OS (that allows more than iphone apps) I would be all over thing thing in a heartbeat.
Right now I have my MBP for on the go work and an iPod Touch for lounging around checking emails/web, I just don’t see this being a part of my current setup. Now for my parents who only email and send photos this would be fantastic!
Basically, you have just described what everyone was hoping for when they got all excited about an apple tablet. The fact that it is not any of that is why the internet is so disappointed.
Hmmm. The Void speaking on behalf of the Internet. Interesting.
I’m surprised you like the iPad so much when your portfolio is based entirely on Flash…which the iPad doesn’t support.
Nor does it support multitasking…so no more running Safari and Photoshop at the same time.
You can’t run photoshop on it. iPhone OS. (I don’t count the mobile version, it’s very stripped down, as expected from something made for an iPhone screen. But I don’t expect there to be a big screen version, not with how apple treats adobe and the pricing in the app store.)
Scott
If I could read your books, Photoshop User and your seminar and Photoshop World handouts on the iPad, it would make me get one ASAP. Please consider electronic distribution for NAPP’s magazines and handouts in addition to the print versions. The seminar and Photoshop World would, of course, be available only to attendees. The ability to access Kelby Training on the iPad (which is a given) will be icing on the cake.
Ina
Accessing Kelby Training is not a given, since KT runs on flash, and the iPad can’t run flash. If you go there all you will get are blue lego bricks where the lessons should be.
I agree with Dave. If this could support a Wacom like product where you could edit right on the device, or link to your Mac and use it like an editing tool then this would be easily worth the price. Either way I think the apps that come out for this machine will really be the thing that makes it useful.
I am definitely going to get an iPad. I can just see myself showing my photo portfolio as well as my photo slideshows on the go to my clients and at the same time present Keynote presentations with the iPad. Only sad thing is that there is no confirmed date of when it will launch in my home country.
whooa! can’t get to get one, it’s my new mobile digital portfolio.
Come on !!! Secret Weapon ???
Sucks there’s nothing new on this… BIG SCREEN ? o_O
Void claims the lack of the USB port is a problem. He(?) ignores the iPad’s dock port—which is just like the dock port on the iPhone, iPod Touch and every iPod since the 2nd generation(?) model. The dock port carries all of the signals necessary for USB amongst other things.—Just like it does with an iPod.
And look here, Apple’s even announced a camera connection kit:
http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/
Sorry, I can’t do all the work for you—you’ll have to navigate to the bottom of the page, to the iPad Accessories section, to read the details.
***
I see a “use case” (yes, even a “business use case”) for the iPad that fills a niche somewhere between my iPhone and my MacBook Pro. I go lots of places where, for various reasons, I don’t want to drag a laptop (plus AC adaptor). In fact, I had a perfect use for just such a device this past weekend. My girlfriend had a hoop dance gathering and we were having dinner with some of the other hoopers afterwards. I enjoy going along for the hooping (and photo op), but also would have liked to spend some of that time writing. (Had I been able to do that, I’d be linking to an essay now rather than hastily jamming my thoughts into a comment stream!)
I “could” have dragged the Mac Book Pro along but, particularly when added to the weight of my (smaller of three) Domke bag, it just felt like “too much” for a social occasion. Yes, I can write (and have written) on the iPhone, but for longer works I find the review/edit/rewrite process on the small screen to be too cumbersome. It isn’t well suited to my way of working—never mind one’s personal experience with the keyboard. (For me the keyboard really isn’t the major obstacle.)
I’ve been considering a “Hackintosh” netbook for some time, but as The Angry Drunk put it (and I am paraphrasing a bit, but not distorting his message) I don’t need “a full OS X instance just to browse the web, read a book, draft an email or write a blog post.” [http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2010/01/28/ipad-calculus/] Like Darby (The Angry Drunk), I am a Mac support professional so another instance of Mac OS X isn’t such a big deal—but it is one more potential time soak. Particularly an unsupported OS X instance—one that I would (presumably) need to spend valuable creative time “hacking”
I would add “do a presentation” and, (hopefully, someday) “light photo editing/processing” to the above list—but the latter is hardly a deal killer as, most days, I make do without this capability when I leave the laptop at home. I guess that’s really the crux of my use case. My laptop is not my “friend and constant companion”—it’s a desktop computer that I sometimes, often reluctantly, lug around with me. This reluctance may date back to my first “luggable”—a Macintosh Portable—and the resultant and permanent “pain in the neck” that it combined with with various text books for gradute school, left me with. This is me. Others wouldn’t consider leaving home without their laptop. Good for them—I just hope they age more gracefully than I did. (And please don’t crowd the restaurant table with your “deck.”)
If the iPad does most of what I think it will do for me, and assuming that (light?) versions of a couple of mission critical desktop apps are forthcoming, (this might bite me in the rear but I suspect the market will deliver) I won’t be replacing the MBP with a newer model anytime soon—opting instead for a big screen iMac sitting on my desk and the light weight, non-multitasking, non-Flash enabled iPad for my field work—along with the recreational uses. Yes, I’ll keep the MBP “just in case” I have cause to lug a full-fledged computer into the field with me—for example, on longer trips when I might “need” to do use Photoshop or do some heavy-duty Aperture work or for client visits where I’m likely to need my own Macintosh.
Smarter (or at least more articulate) minds than mine have weighed in on this. I would suggest that “doubters” read the essays from Steven Frank and Fraiser Spears that I’ve linked to below.
Steven Frank: http://stevenf.tumblr.com/post/359224392/i-need-to-talk-to-you-about-computers-ive-been
Fraser Speirs — Future Shock: http://speirs.org/blog/2010/1/29/future-shock.html
You don’t have to be convinced by their arguments, but you may find food for thought. Just because the device doesn’t do anything “new” (arguments along this line are largely semantic anyway) doesn’t mean that it can’t be revolutionary. It’s not about the technology, or the bullet list of features—present or missing. It’s about what we do with the device and the ways, big or small, that it changes (and hopefully improves) our lives and workflow.
WOW!!!
What a list of comments. How hilarious. I think it’s so funny that people can get so worked up about this. I think it looks awesome…and as I’m not a Apple freak, I think it would be totally cool to have one. Here’s how I see it, Apple has created a NEW product. They didn’t try to reinvent the Tablet PC, or a notebook, or a phone, or anything else. I think they’ve created a new product much like the iPod put mp3 players on the map. Here’s how I see me using mine if and when I get one.
Think of it on the Kitchen counter, or coffee table, almost like an amazing resource sitting right where you need it. You AND YOUR KIDS can control your Mac’s from it, and surf the net, and figure out what and where you want to go that night. I think it’s gorgeous. Seriously imagine having one in a studio as your clients come in, and they flip through your portfolio, or see samples of Leather Craftsman books. I don’t understand why Scott gets so much flack from his normal faithful readers. Don’t kill the messenger!
Nate
PS…I for one, really laugh and love your little comments at the end of people’s extremely negative posts. Such a simple answer, and so true. Great post Scott!
I’ve been doing a lot of research on the ipad over the past few days. I’ve fallen in and out of love with it a few times. All said and done, I think I for one will be buying it. I don’t personally have a Mac of any sort. No Mac Book, iMac, iPhone or iPod Touch. I have a phone for calling people, and a Nikon for shooting. I look forward to (albeit, basic at first) photo editing apps and programs for the iPad. Even if I take a step away from complainers and make it myself! This blog is the one that helped me make up my mind,
“any thing that kept it from being as great as you thought it should be, don’t buy it. It’s that simple.”
My thought exactly Scott. If you find the iPad leaving a “void” of unhappiness in your life, live with out it.
Wow, some people can get furious about apple products, my goodness…
I think the iPad will perform really well. It is exactly as it was described in the keynote, more than an iPhone, less than a Mac. And that’s really good. If it’s too large for you, get an iPhone, too small, get a Mac. Or a PC.
And I don’t see any of the problems above:
- There are already “wacom-like” input devices available, like e.g. the “pogo stylus”.
- With an Eye-Fi card, you wouldn’t even need that USB-Adapter, just send the pictures over the wireless.
- What’s that talk about not being able to sort your photos? Hello, we’re living in the 21st century, is anybody still actually thinking in hard-drive-based folders?? Lightroom anybody? Smart folders?
Someone will create an App, that’s it. I propose an App that allows for tagging and initial corrections and just pushing the pictures into your Dropbox then (if you don’t know what Dropbox is, well… just check it out). Your Lightroom at the office has the Dropbox set up as an auto-import-watch-folder and Bob’s your uncle.
Eventually, Adobe might calm down from being face-slapped with flash and develop an App by itself. Apple will sure as hell provide it’s own Aperture-App.
Apple had the chance to revolutionize the market and tap into the professional digital photographer market with this but no, they failed, and utterly at that. No CF/SD for one, and that’s major. It is totally unacceptable. How on earth would one develop Aperture Lite so you can view, lightly edit, keyword and tag and seamlessly sync with Aperture afterward. I for one am not interested in sacrificing battery battery to transfer images to this thing in the field.
Saying this though, it will take off like the iPhone. Not based upon its features or lack thereof but more upon its developer following and here we will see a huge increase in APP’s. If camera manufacturers take this on board it will become a useful tool.
At present, it doesn’t really offer anything. This should have been the ultimate Modbook.
Hey Scott I won’t make any comment about is the iPad will be a revolutionary as the iPhone, but I wonder if we could use the ipad as one of the EPSON photo viewer, What do you Think? If it work will be awesome when we have a shoot with a client, it should be great way to show a preview of images to the them… Hope the iPad help us as photo viewer…what do you think about?
If and when I can run Photoshop and use it like a Wacom tablet I’ll buy two. How ever I’m willing to take bets that as in Apples history there will be version 2 and 3 within a year. Add ons like touch, usb, camera and more…. Well one can only hope!